• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Has the UAE recognised the principle of Without Prejudice Privilege?

min read

In a recent judgment issued on 22 October 2024, the Dubai Court of Cassation in case No.486/2024 appears to have recognised the principle of without prejudice privilege, a cornerstone of common law dispute resolution. The judgment articulates that admissions made during settlement discussions are not admissible in court proceedings.

 The Cassation judgment states [unofficial translation]: 

“Evidence or admission shall not be taken against the party who presented it, since he presented it without prejudice to rights, and it shall enjoy immunity preventing it from being considered as evidence against him when the case is heard before the court”

 The Cassation judgment (and the Appeal Court judgment that it upheld) appears to mark a shift in the legal landscape of the UAE, indicating a potential alignment with common law legal standards that protect the confidentiality of settlement negotiations. The judgments suggest that the onshore UAE courts may be willing to recognise a principle to allow parties to negotiate freely, without the fear that the admissions will be used against them if the dispute proceeds to litigation.

That said, the Cassation judgment, while influential, does not establish a binding precedent in the UAE legal system.  Judges in Dubai and other courts in the UAE are not legally bound to adhere to this decision, and the extent to which the 'without prejudice' rule will be applied in practice remains uncertain. Both the Court of Appeal and the Court of Cassation do not explain the reasons for their respective decisions, and it remains the case that the UAE Civil Code, Civil Procedure Code, and Law of Evidence do not recognise the principle of without prejudice privilege. 

Therefore, until there is a consistent line of judgments affirming this principle, intervention by the Authority for Unification of Local and Federal Judicial Principles or UAE Law is amended to explicitly recognise ‘without prejudice’ as a privilege, it remains the case that parties engaged in settlement discussions in the UAE should proceed with caution.

Our thinking

  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Notice Obligations and Contractual Time Bars under the New UAE Civil Code: Article 816(3)

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • The Sky’s the Limit: Arbitrating Aviation Disputes

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

    min read
  • eprivateclient features an article by Matt Foster and Sarah Moore on untangling crypto assets in divorce

    Matt Foster

    In the Press

    min read
  • Corporate restructuring: Preparing for Future Challenges

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

    min read
  • How to construe contentious trusts - lessons from recent cases

    Sarah Moore

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys Partner Promotions 2026

    Bart Peerless

    News

    min read
  • Time to Pay Up: The Government Responds to the Late Payments Consultation

    Willemijn Paul

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The 1975 Act 50 Years On: Looking Back and Looking Forward

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

    min read
  • LCIA Announces Consultation on Revising Arbitration Rules

    Gareth Mills

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens its position in the latest Legal 500 EMEA directory, with 22 firm rankings

    News

    min read
  • Farm Business Tenancies: Guidance for long-term FBTs published

    Emma Preece

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Robert Lundie Smith as Head of Intellectual Property

    Robert Lundie Smith

    News

    min read
  • Applicability of the Doctrine of Force Majeure During Unprecedented Times in Bahrain

    Mazin Al Mardhi

    Insights

    min read
  • Miranda Fisher comments in the Financial Times on child custody arrangements and the impact of geopolitics

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

    min read
  • The BBC's Motion to Dismiss President Trump's $10 Billion Defamation Claim: Jurisdiction, Free Speech, and the "Chilling Effect"

    Claudine Morgan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Smaller appetites, bigger shifts: GLP‑1 is reshaping UK retail and M&A

    Iwan Thomas

    Insights

    min read
  • Informal family agreements, constructive trusts and joint property ownership – lessons from the recent High Court decision in Uddin v Uddin [2026] EWHC 150 (Ch)

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

    min read
  • How Stakeholder Engagement and Grievance Mechanisms Strengthen Human Rights Due Diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

Back to top