• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Has the UAE recognised the principle of Without Prejudice Privilege?

In a recent judgment issued on 22 October 2024, the Dubai Court of Cassation in case No.486/2024 appears to have recognised the principle of without prejudice privilege, a cornerstone of common law dispute resolution. The judgment articulates that admissions made during settlement discussions are not admissible in court proceedings.

 The Cassation judgment states [unofficial translation]: 

“Evidence or admission shall not be taken against the party who presented it, since he presented it without prejudice to rights, and it shall enjoy immunity preventing it from being considered as evidence against him when the case is heard before the court”

 The Cassation judgment (and the Appeal Court judgment that it upheld) appears to mark a shift in the legal landscape of the UAE, indicating a potential alignment with common law legal standards that protect the confidentiality of settlement negotiations. The judgments suggest that the onshore UAE courts may be willing to recognise a principle to allow parties to negotiate freely, without the fear that the admissions will be used against them if the dispute proceeds to litigation.

That said, the Cassation judgment, while influential, does not establish a binding precedent in the UAE legal system.  Judges in Dubai and other courts in the UAE are not legally bound to adhere to this decision, and the extent to which the 'without prejudice' rule will be applied in practice remains uncertain. Both the Court of Appeal and the Court of Cassation do not explain the reasons for their respective decisions, and it remains the case that the UAE Civil Code, Civil Procedure Code, and Law of Evidence do not recognise the principle of without prejudice privilege. 

Therefore, until there is a consistent line of judgments affirming this principle, intervention by the Authority for Unification of Local and Federal Judicial Principles or UAE Law is amended to explicitly recognise ‘without prejudice’ as a privilege, it remains the case that parties engaged in settlement discussions in the UAE should proceed with caution.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    Events

  • Through the Looking-Glass: Is the Government's Vision for Farming Coming into Focus?

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • The Murdochs and the Buffetts – succession planning for billionaires

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • LCIA's 2024 Casework Report – Still Going Strong

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Jurisdictions: choosing the right base for your family office

    Insights

  • Serious failings by Trustee amount to a breach of trust: Charles Russell Speechlys advises the Hon. Mrs Dawson-Damer in appeal of long-running trust dispute

    Ziva Robertson

    News

  • Delay of the new food and drink ads regulation & impact on live sports broadcasts

    Sarah Johnson

    Insights

  • Understanding the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025: Implications for UK Businesses

    Janine Regan

    Insights

  • Maddie Dunn writes for Farmers Guardian on last month’s Spending Review and the Government’s attitude to farming

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

  • ICC Arbitration Statistics 2024 – UAE Breaks into Top 5 Seats

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Why Getty Images v Stability AI Judgment Will Not Answer Our Key Questions

    Nick White

    Insights

  • How does extradition work?

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Extradition in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Food Security is National Security: can regenerative agriculture help fortify the UK?

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Keeping compliant: Navigating SFO regulations globally

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

  • Navigating Conditions Precedent: a comparative analysis of Contractual Practices in the Middle East and England & Wales

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

  • Relocation: Important factors to consider before moving

    Insights

  • To share or not to share, that is the question. The Supreme Court hands down judgment in ‘big money’ divorce case Standish v Standish and clarifies the position regarding matrimonialisation and the sharing principle

    Miranda Fisher

    Insights

  • Joseph Evans, Ethan Khurwolah and Simon Heatley write for Thomson Reuters Practical Law on litigation funding and PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • CDR Magazine quotes Simon Le Wita on the Keystone XL pipeline ICSID arbitration

    Simon Le Wita

    In the Press

Back to top