• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

AI in Advertising: Balancing Innovation and Integrity

In the realm of advertising, artificial intelligence (AI) is no longer just a futuristic concept—it's a current reality. Brands across industries are putting out entirely AI-generated advertisements and campaigns. Mango has led the charge within the fashion industry and has launched an entire campaign using AI-generated models for its teen line, signalling a new era where AI leads the charge in creative campaign development. As Mango's own press release highlights, this move "marks a before and after in the history of advertising," setting a precedent that could potentially reshape the modelling industry as we know it. Critics have raised concerns about the potential for false advertising and the ethical implications of replacing real models with AI. The allure of AI in advertising is clear. It offers new options for efficiency, the ability to personalize content to customers on a massive scale, and the potential to unlock new creative horizons. Brands can now design models to suit any number of scenarios, styles, or backgrounds, opening up a world of creative possibilities that can be adapted instantaneously to market trends and feedback. This technology empowers advertisers to create highly targeted and dynamic visual campaigns that effectively engage consumers.

Adherence to advertising regulations

However, this brave new world of AI-driven advertising is not without its legal and ethical minefields. One of the most pressing concerns is the impact of AI-generated models on body image. Current advertising codes by the Committees of Advertising Practice (CAP) and Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice (BCAP) set standards to prevent harmful body image representations. AI, with its capacity to create hyper-realistic and potentially idealized images, could inadvertently contravene these standards, perpetuating unrealistic beauty ideals and exacerbating body image issues among consumers. Although CAP and BCAP recently concluded that no new advertising regulations relating to body image are necessary at this time (as discussed in further detail in an article by my colleague Imogen Brown, here), any companies using AI-generated models should still be mindful of current regulations.

Moreover, there's a risk that AI could create content that strays into the territory of being "too good to be true". The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) mandates that advertisements must not mislead by inaccuracy, ambiguity, exaggeration, omission, or otherwise. AI-generated content that misrepresents products could fall foul of these regulations, leading to legal repercussions and a loss of consumer trust.

Data Protection Considerations

The generation of AI models also presents data protection concerns. If the imagery used to create these models is derived from Mango's historic database of real models, these images could be considered personal data (as highlighted in an article by my colleague Janine Regan (Head of Data Protection), here). Consequently, there must be a lawful basis for processing this personal data under data protection law. Relying on 'legitimate interests' would require Mango to provide clear privacy information, demonstrate that their processing is absolutely necessary and does not infringe on the rights and freedoms of the individuals concerned, and allow for a right to object. It remains to be seen whether Mango has issued an appropriate privacy notice or if these stringent requirements have been fulfilled.

Potential intellectual property implications

The intellectual property implications of AI are equally significant. AI models are often trained on vast amounts of data, some of which may include copyrighted material. This raises complex questions about the ownership of the resulting content, whether the original creators are due compensation and the possibility of AI-generated content inadvertently infringing upon the IP rights of original creators. Moreover, if someone's image and likeness are being used without their consent to train AI, this could mirror the issues at the heart of the recent SAG-AFTRA strikes in the US acting and gaming industries. These strikes highlighted the importance of consent and compensation for the use of one's image and likeness, which is a consideration that could similarly impact the use of AI in advertising. In the absence of a definitive legal framework, the deployment of generative AI in advertising campaigns is venturing into uncharted copyright territory.

Looking forward

In conclusion, the integration of AI into advertising campaigns offers a glimpse into the future of marketing. Yet, it also presents a host of legal and ethical challenges that must be carefully managed. The advertising world must work in concert with legal professionals to establish responsible AI practices that respect both consumer rights and the rule of law. Only then can we ensure that AI serves to enhance, rather than undermine, the art of advertising. 

AI has allowed us to be more creative and innovative, and to optimize the customer experience

Our thinking

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Rivals: Filming Locations and Considerations for Landed Estates

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to unfair prejudice petitions

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • Beyond Dry January: The Rise of the Low and Non-Alcoholic Beverage Sector

    Iwan Thomas

    Insights

  • New food and drink ads regulation & impact on live sports broadcasts

    Sarah Johnson

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys hosts Hard Conversations and Smart Conflict®, a Women in Leadership event

    Sarah Wigington

    News

  • AML in decentralized finance and traditional finance

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Sangna Chauhan on the impact of the abolition of UK non-dom status on her workload

    Sangna Chauhan

    In the Press

  • Up in the AI: Gen AI & looking forwards, and backwards

    Joe Cohen

    Podcasts

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Growth Partners on its lead investment as part of a $4.3 million funding round for finance-focused legal AI specialist, Semeris

    David Coates

    News

  • Building Safety: What’s in store for 2025?

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

  • Has the UAE recognised the principle of Without Prejudice Privilege?

    Maher Al Nashar

    Quick Reads

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Claire Fallows on planning law reform

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • Budget 2024 and its impact on IHT and estates

    Harriet Betteridge

    Podcasts

  • Joe Cohen features in The Lawyer’s ‘Hot 100’ list for 2024-25

    Joe Cohen

    News

  • Appointment of company directors – who can do it and how?

    Stephen Burns

    Insights

  • A Digital Pound: The Bank of England January 2025 Update

    Racheal Muldoon

    Insights

Back to top