• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

SIAC's New Insolvency Arbitration Protocol

On 13 December 2024, the SIAC opened a public consultation into its new SIAC Insolvency Arbitration Protocol (the “Protocol”). The Protocol is designed to provide a set of truncated procedural rules for the resolution of disputes “arising out of or in connection with, or in anticipation of, any insolvency proceedings”. Insolvency proceedings are defined widely in the Protocol and include judicial, administrative and debt restructuring proceedings where the affairs of a person or entity are subject to, or will be subject to, control or supervision by a court. The Protocol states that awards generally have to be rendered within 6 months from the date of constitution of the tribunal and sets the default seat of the arbitration as Singapore and Singapore Law as the default governing law although this can be changed by the parties. The Protocol also anticipates the creation of a specialist panel of arbitrators with expertise in insolvency related disputes, the SIAC Specialist Insolvency Disputes Panel. Given that insolvency practitioners are generally officers of the Court and have reporting duties to creditors and their supervising Court, the Protocol also allows the parties to request the tribunal to amend the default confidentiality provisions surrounding an arbitration to allow parties to inter alia disclose part or all of any award.

This Protocol is a positive development given the increasing globalisation of business and consequently of cross-border insolvencies; it provides an alternative forum for the determination of insolvency disputes which will be particularly attractive in cases which involve foreign debtors. That said parties still need to be aware that not all jurisdictions accept the arbitrability of insolvency disputes and some jurisdictions draw a distinction between private remedial claims which they recognise as arbitrable, and avoidance claims pursued in insolvency proceedings which are non-arbitrable[1]. The public consultation closes on 17 January 2025.


 

[1] Article V(2)(a) of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 (New York Convention) provides that the recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award may be refused if “the subject matter of the difference is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the law of that country”.

Our thinking

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to unfair prejudice petitions

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • New food and drink ads regulation & impact on live sports broadcasts

    Sarah Johnson

    Insights

  • AML in decentralized finance and traditional finance

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Has the UAE recognised the principle of Without Prejudice Privilege?

    Maher Al Nashar

    Quick Reads

  • Appointment of company directors – who can do it and how?

    Stephen Burns

    Insights

  • Tribunal Tactics: Securing Favourable Outcomes and Enforcing Awards

    Alim Khamis FCIArb

    Events

  • Understanding Contempt of Court in Swiss Law: Key Provisions and Penalties

    Remo Wagner

    Insights

  • Howells v Newport City Council: beware not to lose the private key to your cryptocurrency wallet

    Sonia Kenawy

    Insights

  • Combatting Lookalikes Revisited - clouds lift for brand owners as Thatchers wins its appeal over Aldi copycat cider

    Mary Bagnall

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Mary Bagnall on Aldi’s infringement of Thatchers’ trademark

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • Justice for the Victims of Britain's Largest Ponzi Scheme?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Understanding Civil and Criminal Remedies in France for Financial Crimes

    Frédéric Jeannin

    Insights

  • The Property (Digital Assets etc) Bill: A Wider Category of Assets for the Insolvent Estate?

    Cassidy Fan

    Insights

  • Why Man City took ‘Super “Dry”’ off its Training Kit

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Abu Dhabi Global Market introduces new employment regulations in the financial free zone

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

  • Promoting certainty in international trade and investment: The 2005 Hague Convention and the enforcement of foreign judgments in the UK and Switzerland

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

Back to top