• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Community Infrastructure Levy – a reminder on commencement notices

How to serve a commencement notice

Last year we wrote here about Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) liability notices and associated financial penalties, following a decision by the Planning Inspectorate that a liability notice had been correctly served by the charging authority by sending it to the applicant’s agent via email. 

Last month, the Inspectorate had to consider whether an applicant had correctly served a commencement notice by sending a letter (see here; appeal with reference: APP/K0235/L/24/3347269).

Regulation 67 of the CIL Regulations 2010 (the CIL Regs) details that a commencement notice must be submitted in writing on a form published by the Secretary of State (or on a form to substantially the same effect) prior to commencing development. The Secretary of State has published a template “Form 6” which can be found here, for such a purpose. 

In this case, whilst the Inspector expressed sympathy for the appellant, noting that he had sent a letter to the charging authority informing them of his intention to commence works, it was not in the correct form – therefore it did not comply with the requirements of Regulation 67 and a surcharge was upheld. 

This decision serves as a reminder for applicants to ensure careful compliance with the CIL Regs given that breaches, even if they are genuine mistakes, can lead to financial penalties being imposed. 

When to serve your commencement notice

Regulation 67 states that a commencement notice must be submitted “no later than the day before the day on which the chargeable development is to be commenced”. It is therefore important to establish when development is due to commence.  

Earlier this year we wrote here about the meaning of “commencement” for CIL purposes and the issue has again come before the Planning Inspectorate (see here; appeal with reference: APP/T5150/L/24/3345047).

Regulation 6 of the CIL Regs details that development is to be treated as commencing on the earliest date when a material operation begins, with “material operation” having the same meaning as section 56 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (the TCPA).

In this appeal, the charging authority considered that demolition of internal walls amounted to commencement. However, the Inspector determined that the works undertaken were minor such that they did not amount to a “material operation”.  The effect was that a commencement notice did not have to be served and CIL had not been triggered.  

Those undertaking preliminary works should consider the risk that the Council will argue that the permission has been implemented and CIL has become payable. 

"Where planning permission is granted for a chargeable development, a commencement notice must be submitted to the collecting authority no later than the day before the day on which the chargeable development is to be commenced" (Regulation 67(1))

Our thinking

  • Hannah Catt writes for Tax Adviser on the implications of the newly introduced high value council tax surcharge in the UK

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

  • UK Living Sector 2026: Regulatory pressures, new trading platforms and more accessible public markets

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

  • The Standard quotes William Marriott on the impact of the newly introduced 'mansion tax' in the UK

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • Amenity Space in UK Office Buildings: Why It Matters and What Tenants Need to Consider

    Lynsey Inglis

    Insights

  • UK Hotels Sector 2026: Renovations, AI and Experience‑Led Stays

    James Broadhurst

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows Real Estate team with the appointment of UK and Italian market expert Chiara Del Frate

    Robin Grove MIoL

    News

  • Property Wire quotes Josh Risso-Gill on the 'deep resourcing challenges' faced by many local planning authorities amidst significant delays

    Josh Risso-Gill

    In the Press

  • Can a late Payment Notice be treated as a Pay Less Notice: Vision Construct v Gypcraft?

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • David Lloyd Leisure Completes Sale and Leaseback of New Herne Bay Club with Support from Charles Russell Speechlys

    Mark White

    News

  • What Changes in Switzerland on 1 Jan 2026: Debt Registers, Defects, Credit, and Remote Testimony

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

  • Saudi Arabia’s 2025 Law on Expropriation of Real Estate for Public Interest and Temporary Taking of Property: Key Takeaways on the New Legal Framework

    Etidal Alwazani

    Insights

  • Bella Preece awarded first prize in the Property Litigation Association's Alan Langleben Memorial Blog Competition 2025

    Bella Preece

    News

  • Georgina Muskett writes for Property Week on the conundrum of green leasing

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: Top 5 Changes under the new Renters’ Rights Act 2025

    Lauren Fraser

    Podcasts

  • Ministry of Sound Limited v. The British Foreign Wharf Company Limited (and ors): Balancing terms of a renewal lease with redevelopment potential

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • UAE CCL Reforms: Introducing Multi-Class Shares, Drag / Tag Rights, Deadlock Solutions and Governance Continuity

    Mo Nawash

    Quick Reads

  • Property Week quotes Andrew Ross on the case of Romal Capital v Peel Holdings

    Andrew Ross

    In the Press

  • Building Safety Lookahead: 2026 will see the reform of the BSR, introduction of the Building Safety Levy and more

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

  • Collateral warranties: Liability and equivalent rights and defences clauses

    Jane Burrows

    Insights

  • UK Autumn Budget: Five minute guide for residential property owners

    Simon Green

    Quick Reads

Back to top