• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Community Infrastructure Levy – a reminder on commencement notices

How to serve a commencement notice

Last year we wrote here about Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) liability notices and associated financial penalties, following a decision by the Planning Inspectorate that a liability notice had been correctly served by the charging authority by sending it to the applicant’s agent via email. 

Last month, the Inspectorate had to consider whether an applicant had correctly served a commencement notice by sending a letter (see here; appeal with reference: APP/K0235/L/24/3347269).

Regulation 67 of the CIL Regulations 2010 (the CIL Regs) details that a commencement notice must be submitted in writing on a form published by the Secretary of State (or on a form to substantially the same effect) prior to commencing development. The Secretary of State has published a template “Form 6” which can be found here, for such a purpose. 

In this case, whilst the Inspector expressed sympathy for the appellant, noting that he had sent a letter to the charging authority informing them of his intention to commence works, it was not in the correct form – therefore it did not comply with the requirements of Regulation 67 and a surcharge was upheld. 

This decision serves as a reminder for applicants to ensure careful compliance with the CIL Regs given that breaches, even if they are genuine mistakes, can lead to financial penalties being imposed. 

When to serve your commencement notice

Regulation 67 states that a commencement notice must be submitted “no later than the day before the day on which the chargeable development is to be commenced”. It is therefore important to establish when development is due to commence.  

Earlier this year we wrote here about the meaning of “commencement” for CIL purposes and the issue has again come before the Planning Inspectorate (see here; appeal with reference: APP/T5150/L/24/3345047).

Regulation 6 of the CIL Regs details that development is to be treated as commencing on the earliest date when a material operation begins, with “material operation” having the same meaning as section 56 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (the TCPA).

In this appeal, the charging authority considered that demolition of internal walls amounted to commencement. However, the Inspector determined that the works undertaken were minor such that they did not amount to a “material operation”.  The effect was that a commencement notice did not have to be served and CIL had not been triggered.  

Those undertaking preliminary works should consider the risk that the Council will argue that the permission has been implemented and CIL has become payable. 

"Where planning permission is granted for a chargeable development, a commencement notice must be submitted to the collecting authority no later than the day before the day on which the chargeable development is to be commenced" (Regulation 67(1))

Our thinking

  • Michael O'Connor and Lauren Fraser write for Property Week on the impact of the Building Safety Act on residential property management

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Martyn’s Law receives Royal Assent – what do property owners and occupiers need to do now?

    Ben Butterworth

    Quick Reads

  • Can Labour deliver 1.5m new homes?

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Setting Standards: The Ciarb Guideline on AI Use in Arbitration

    Dalal Alhouti

    Insights

  • Risky Business: Lessons in clearing up Contractual Confusion in John Sisk and Son Ltd v Capital & Centric (Rose) Ltd

    Murron McKeiver

    Insights

  • TCC decision on validity of payment and payless notices served simultaneously

    Johnathon Grasso

    Insights

  • Property Patter: “It’s the economy, stupid”

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Developers Granted (Temporary) Reprieve: Building Safety Levy Postponed To Autumn 2026

    Ashley Williams

    Insights

  • Property Wire quotes Ben Butterworth on Martyn's Law receiving Royal Assent

    Ben Butterworth

    In the Press

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Energising Infrastructure: Key Infrastructure Reforms in the Latest Planning & Infrastructure Bill

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

  • Nick Hurley and Erin Hughes write for Personnel Today on two recent constructive dismissal tribunal cases

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • Michael O'Connor writes for Construction News on the potential impact of Building Liability Orders (BLOs) on the construction sector

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Joanne Searle writes for CMM Magazine on the potential for Government support of the social care sector

    Joanne Searle

    In the Press

  • Building BioHubs miniseries: Carter Jonas

    Lynsey Inglis

    Podcasts

  • Adjudicators can hear legacy building safety defect claims: BDW Trading Limited v Ardmore Construction Limited [2024] EWHC 3235

    Melanie Tomlin

    Insights

  • The first case on Information Orders in connection with Building Liability Orders: BDW Trading Limited v. Ardmore Construction Limited & Ors

    Ogooluwa Esther Michael-John

    Insights

  • Goodbye HS2 …..Hello HS2-lite?

    Richard Flenley

    Quick Reads

  • Michael O'Connor participates in Construction News podcast on building safety beyond Grenfell

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Carris Peacey and Sylwia Jatczak write for R3 RECOVERY Magazine on the Building Safety Act 2022 and the obligations on IPs

    Carris Peacey

    In the Press

Back to top