• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

To Trick or to Treat? - the not-so-spooky guide to navigating Halloween as co-parents

For children, Halloween is a time of costumes, sweets, and spooky fun with friends, ushering in the start of the festive period. For co-parents, however, the holiday period can sometimes be a scary time of uncertainty and may bring underlying tensions to the surface when differing parenting values come into conflict.

Parents who have parental responsibility for a child essentially share this and have equal rights and responsibilities in respect of making decisions for their child(ren). The position with co-parents can inevitably be more complex, and one co-parent may ultimately find themselves in a position where they are ‘tricked’ (for example, where the other parent is trying to impose a unilateral decision in respect of the child(ren)), rather than ‘treating’ them with the respect they are entitled to as a parent.

Trick: Ignoring or changing the parenting plan or breaching an order

One common trick in co-parenting conflicts is where one parent ignores the existing plan, causing confusion and conflict, for example, by keeping the child for an extended period during Halloween without prior agreement.

Treat: Incorporate Halloween into Parenting Plans

Ensure all holiday plans are well-documented within a written plan. While informal agreements can work, a well-drafted parenting plan provides clarity and serves as a reference point should misunderstandings arise. 

Consider adding Halloween into your existing plan if it isn’t already. A well-drafted parenting plan will detail the specific arrangements for the holiday, such as which parent is responsible for which activity, and will specify whether the parents will alternate hosting Halloween each year or whether the day is to be shared to ensure equal time with both parents. 

Whilst effective child-focused communication can alleviate conflict, a dispute may still occur throughout the duration of a co-parenting relationship and a well-drafted plan will include sufficient provision for how disputes are to be resolved, such as through mediation or consultation with a family lawyer.

The best parenting plan is one which continues to evolve and adapt to shape the needs and wants of a child as they grow older. The agreement for Halloween one year may not be appropriate a year later, and so it is important to keep plans updated. Amending a parenting plan typically requires mutual consent from both parents and, in some cases, legal approval from the court. 

Trick: Trick-or-treating without supervision?

It can be a source of contention when one parent decides to allow the child to go trick-or-treating without parental supervision. One parent might feel that the child is old enough to go out unsupervised, whilst the other might have concerns as to the child’s safety.

Treat: From Costumes to Compromise

The ‘treat’ here is to find a compromise that addresses both parents’ concerns and focuses on the best wishes of the child. Co-parents should try to work together to agree, well in advance, on appropriate safety measures, such as setting a curfew, providing a mobile phone or whether one parent might accompany the child while maintaining a respectful distance to allow independence. 

Trick: Disagreements over medical decisions

The autumn season (where Halloween falls) brings with it the additional decision of whether to agree to the annual flu vaccination for children (these are generally offered at schools). Parents may have different views on whether a child should receive the vaccination. This can cause a conflict if a decision is made unilaterally.

Treat: Discuss the decision together and consider whether to make a court application if an agreement cannot be reached

Decisions about a child’s medical treatment should not be made unilaterally. Whilst non-court dispute resolution methods should be considered first (for example, mediation), given the importance of medical decisions (and sometimes urgency), if an agreement cannot be reached, one parent may need to make an application to the court for a specific issue order under Section 8 of the Children Act 1989 (to apply for an order for permission of the court for the child to be vaccinated), or for a prohibited steps order (to apply for an order preventing a child being vaccinated). 

Trick: Unilateral decision-making around school holidays

Conflict can occur when one co-parent makes unilateral decisions over Halloween or indeed half term (where it falls this year) without consulting the other. This might include taking a child out of school early (or missing term time), disregarding the other parent’s wishes by letting the child stay up late, or letting them eat too many sweets before bed. Such decisions can lead to significant tension in the co-parenting relationship and may potentially cause distress for the child. 

Treat: Effective child-focused communication

The treat to counter this trick is to prioritise open and child-focused communication, early planning, and flexibility. Discussions between co-parents need not be the scariest part of Halloween and co-parents should strive to set aside personal differences and work collaboratively to focus on the priority for Halloween – creating fun and lasting memories for a child who feels supported and loved by both parents. 

Given the importance of decisions concerning children, the moral of this tale is that early communication, clear planning, and openness as parents can lead to a very Happy Halloween rather than being on the receiving end of any frights when it comes to arrangements for the children. 

 

Frankenstein on a door for Halloween in Kensington, London

Our thinking

  • Sharing the Season – the child-focused approach to Christmas

    Rebecca Arnold

    Quick Reads

  • Was it Panglossian or Painful? A year after the US and UK elections

    Jeffrey Lee

    Events

  • Jamie Cartwright writes for Independent Schools Magazine on how VAT on private school fees is shaping the future of the independent education sector

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • Magnum spins out of Unilever: a clearer investment story but a cool valuation

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Licence to Till: what happens when a ‘Grazing Licence’ is really a tenancy? Accidental tenancies, shams and documents that just don’t do what they say on the tin…

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Georgina Muskett writes for Property Week on the conundrum of green leasing

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

  • Paramount launches hostile bid for the entirety of Warner Bros

    Grace Hudson

    Quick Reads

  • Property Patter: Top 5 Changes under the new Renters’ Rights Act 2025

    Lauren Fraser

    Podcasts

  • DMCCA: What the UK’s new consumer rules now mean for consumer facing businesses

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Transactions at an undervalue: trusts of land

    Roger Elford

    Insights

  • Ministry of Sound Limited v. The British Foreign Wharf Company Limited (and ors): Balancing terms of a renewal lease with redevelopment potential

    Grace O'Leary

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises FIRST and its shareholders on sale to Encore

    Mark Howard

    News

  • International Tax Compliance (Amendment) Regulations 2025: What UK trustees need to know

    Elinor Boote

    Quick Reads

  • Helliwell v Entwistle – the (actual) conclusion!

    Sarah Jane Boon

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Puma Growth Partners on its investment in HubBox

    Ashwin Pillay

    News

  • Candy Kittens takes a bite as Unilever slims down

    Iwan Thomas

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025 – Inheritance Tax (IHT) and charitable gifts

    Richard Honey

    Insights

  • Advocacy: Lessons from The Mandela Brief for International Arbitration Today

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

  • The Times, City AM and the Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on government plans to remove the cap on unfair dismissal claims

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

  • Promises and probate: when is “detriment” worth the family farm and what happens when a promise is only relied on for a defined period?

    Matthew Clark

    Insights

Back to top