• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Body Image and Advertising: CAP and BCAP Determine that Current Advertising Codes are Sufficient to Address Potential Harms

min read

After reviewing concerns about how advertising affects people's views on body image, the Committees of Advertising Practice (CAP) and the Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice (BCAP) have concluded their review on body image in advertising. Their final statement, which was published on 10 October 2024, has determined that no new advertising regulations are necessary at this time.

The review by CAP and BCAP was initiated to assess whether the current CAP and BCAP Codes (Advertising Codes) and guidelines sufficiently tackled the potential damage caused in three areas identified for review:

  • The Alteration of Digital Images and Labelling:

The inquiry considered whether advertisements should label where they have been digitally altered to prevent unrealistic body image expectations. However, CAP and BCAP found insufficient evidence to suggest digitally altered images in advertising have a specific harmful impact. They expressed concerns that labelling these images as being digitally altered could inadvertently encourage influencers and individuals to seek cosmetic procedures instead of simply altering an image. The CAP and BCAP determined that the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) can enforce the existing Advertising Codes on misleading advertisements against digitally altered images that are either irresponsible or misleading to consumers.

  • Muscularity in Advertising:

The depiction of muscularity and its potential pressure to conform to a particular body ideal was analysed. The review focused on data captured by large brands from the fashion, fitness and technology sectors but did not find any content that was overtly irresponsible or harmful within the scope of the existing Advertising Codes.

  • Depiction of Women from Ethnic Minorities:

Concerns regarding the portrayal of women from minority ethnic backgrounds and the creation of unattainable body ideals were also reviewed.

Application of Existing Guidance and Codes:

The CAP and BCAP's final statement confirmed that existing measures are adequate to mitigate harm related to body image in advertising. Other factors, including cultural and social influences, are also at play in driving these issues, but were considered to fall beyond the remit of the Advertising Codes. 

The current Advertising Codes and guidance applied by the ASA can be used address issues when advertisements are misleading, socially irresponsible, or include harmful gender stereotypes (CAP Code 1.3 and 3, BCAP Code 1.2 and 3). There are several instances where influencers have already been called out by the ASA for misleading advertisements by using filters to enhance product performance, highlighting the existing codes in action.

Looking ahead: 

Although there was no persuasive case to justify new regulation in this area, businesses, intermediaries, and individuals are reminded to continue adhering to the Advertising Codes, ensuring that advertisements are compliant and are not deemed misleading to consumers or irresponsible. This is not always easy in an area which will continues to be in the spotlight and which is subject to the blurring of advertising, editorial content and social media.

Where advertising potentially causes body image related harms, the ASA can readily and will continue to take action under a number of existing protections offered in the Codes and guidance to ensure such harms are mitigated.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • CasinoBeats quotes Darren Bailey on player betting bans and sports gambling partnerships

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • William Longrigg writes in the Law Society Gazette on the potential return of Calderbank offers in family proceedings

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Pay Up or We'll Tell All: The High Court's Firm Stance on Blackmail in Privacy Cases

    Hannah Gornall

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top