• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Body Image and Advertising: CAP and BCAP Determine that Current Advertising Codes are Sufficient to Address Potential Harms

min read

After reviewing concerns about how advertising affects people's views on body image, the Committees of Advertising Practice (CAP) and the Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice (BCAP) have concluded their review on body image in advertising. Their final statement, which was published on 10 October 2024, has determined that no new advertising regulations are necessary at this time.

The review by CAP and BCAP was initiated to assess whether the current CAP and BCAP Codes (Advertising Codes) and guidelines sufficiently tackled the potential damage caused in three areas identified for review:

  • The Alteration of Digital Images and Labelling:

The inquiry considered whether advertisements should label where they have been digitally altered to prevent unrealistic body image expectations. However, CAP and BCAP found insufficient evidence to suggest digitally altered images in advertising have a specific harmful impact. They expressed concerns that labelling these images as being digitally altered could inadvertently encourage influencers and individuals to seek cosmetic procedures instead of simply altering an image. The CAP and BCAP determined that the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) can enforce the existing Advertising Codes on misleading advertisements against digitally altered images that are either irresponsible or misleading to consumers.

  • Muscularity in Advertising:

The depiction of muscularity and its potential pressure to conform to a particular body ideal was analysed. The review focused on data captured by large brands from the fashion, fitness and technology sectors but did not find any content that was overtly irresponsible or harmful within the scope of the existing Advertising Codes.

  • Depiction of Women from Ethnic Minorities:

Concerns regarding the portrayal of women from minority ethnic backgrounds and the creation of unattainable body ideals were also reviewed.

Application of Existing Guidance and Codes:

The CAP and BCAP's final statement confirmed that existing measures are adequate to mitigate harm related to body image in advertising. Other factors, including cultural and social influences, are also at play in driving these issues, but were considered to fall beyond the remit of the Advertising Codes. 

The current Advertising Codes and guidance applied by the ASA can be used address issues when advertisements are misleading, socially irresponsible, or include harmful gender stereotypes (CAP Code 1.3 and 3, BCAP Code 1.2 and 3). There are several instances where influencers have already been called out by the ASA for misleading advertisements by using filters to enhance product performance, highlighting the existing codes in action.

Looking ahead: 

Although there was no persuasive case to justify new regulation in this area, businesses, intermediaries, and individuals are reminded to continue adhering to the Advertising Codes, ensuring that advertisements are compliant and are not deemed misleading to consumers or irresponsible. This is not always easy in an area which will continues to be in the spotlight and which is subject to the blurring of advertising, editorial content and social media.

Where advertising potentially causes body image related harms, the ASA can readily and will continue to take action under a number of existing protections offered in the Codes and guidance to ensure such harms are mitigated.

Our thinking

  • Alumni drinks reception

    Events

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Court Determined Global Licence Determinations (Interim and Final): Cross Border Complexities

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • The Playbook to Superscale: Hacks 1-3

    Events

  • Key factors to understand when investing in a regulated business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Arise Capital Partners on its acquisition of Sheffield Wednesday Football Club

    Keir Gordon

    News

    min read
  • Supply Chain Resilience: From "Just in Time" to "Just in Case"

    Mark Dewar

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write for FT Adviser on how the Serious Fraud Office's latest business plan measures up against its five-year strategy

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises BioMed Realty on two new lettings at the Babraham B960 Research Campus

    Lynsey Inglis

    News

    min read
  • Upward only rent review ban becomes law

    Sarah Keens

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Under Oath – Not Under Attack: A practical guide on how to give evidence in the Family Court

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Renters’ Rights Act 2025: Ready, set, go!

    Lauren Fraser

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Access to privileged company documents: shareholder rule abolished

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Limitation and unfair prejudice petitions: the legend of Zedra

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • From Prime Time to Match Day: Engaging the Female Audience

    Events

  • Five Fast Facts: Top 5 things to consider when preparing to sell a Financial Services business

    Charlie Ring

    Insights

    min read
  • Data Centre Arbitration in the Middle East: Navigating Disputes Amid Security Challenges

    Gareth Mills

    Insights

    min read
Back to top