• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Tax treatment on pensions following the Budget and the impact on divorce settlements

The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, yesterday announced Labour’s first post-election budget. It brings a variety of tax changes, including in relation to the tax treatment of pensions.  

The key change from the Budget, in relation to the tax treatment of pensions, is that “from 6 April 2027 most unused pension funds and death benefits will be included within the value of a person’s estate for Inheritance Tax purposes”. A technical consultation has been launched to consider the process required to implement this change for UK-registered pension schemes. 

It is important to remember that the majority of domestic state pensions i.e. UK-registered pension schemes (excluding the basic state pension and new state pension) are capable of being shared between ex-spouses upon divorce. This includes pensions that are in payment. 

There are three ways in which pensions can be divided between ex-spouses when they divorce in England and Wales:

1.They can be offset – so that one party receives non-pension assets in exchange for giving up any rights they may have to the pension assets. This is not without risks, and a Pensions on Divorce Expert (sometimes referred to as a “PODE”) can be instructed to provide an expert view on what an appropriate offsetting amount could be. 

2.They can be shared (known as a Pension Sharing Order) - a transfer from one party’s pension pot (or pots) to the other party. The other party will then hold the pension provision that has been transferred to them in their own pension pot and, depending on the rules of the pension being shared, this can be an existing pension or a new pension set up for that purpose. 

Pension Sharing Orders are the most common way to split a pension on divorce. 

It is important to know that Pension Sharing Orders are always expressed as a percentage, rather than a defined sum, and can be implemented by the pension trustees at any point within a four month window following receipt of (1) the sealed final financial remedy order; (2) the sealed pension sharing annex; (3) the final order of divorce of dissolution; and (4) payment of all outstanding charges requested by the pension scheme. If someone is continuing to pay into a pension that is to be shared then they may wish to cease making payments, provided there is no agreement that they will continue to do so, until the pension sharing order has been implemented.

3.They can be attached to (known as a Pension Attachment Order) – the court can order that one party receives the following provision from the other’s pension pot (or pots):

a. All or a proportion of the income when the pension comes into payment;

b. All or a proportion of the available lump sum when the pension comes into payment; and

c. All or a proportion of the lump sum payable in the event of the death of the party who holds the pension.

The benefit to the receiving party of this provision will need to be considered in light of the new tax changes and potential Inheritance Tax charges on any remaining pension funds in the event of the death of the paying party.

Pension sharing can often form a core part of an ex-spouse’s financial settlement on divorce, and should not be overlooked. Family lawyers will need to take careful note of the Inheritance Tax changes for pensions announced in the Budget when advising on pension sharing on divorce going forward.

 

"from 6 April 2027 most unused pension funds and death benefits will be included within the value of a person’s estate for Inheritance Tax purposes"

Our thinking

  • Alumni Drinks Reception

    Events

  • Women in Leadership: Prima Facie

    Events

  • Private wealth shuffle: Uncovering the latest relocation trends of fortunes

    Yacine Diallo

    Insights

  • Can Labour deliver 1.5m new homes?

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Setting Standards: The Ciarb Guideline on AI Use in Arbitration

    Dalal Alhouti

    Insights

  • Risky Business: Lessons in clearing up Contractual Confusion in John Sisk and Son Ltd v Capital & Centric (Rose) Ltd

    Murron McKeiver

    Insights

  • TCC decision on validity of payment and payless notices served simultaneously

    Johnathon Grasso

    Insights

  • Investors' Chronicle quotes Natalie Butler on how to pass on your digital assets

    Natalie Butler

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client Puma Growth Partners on its investment in LOVE CORN

    Ashwin Pillay

    News

  • Startups Magazine quotes Daniel Rosenberg on the use of AI and technology in M&A

    Daniel Rosenberg

    In the Press

  • Relocation to Portugal: The Portuguese Tax Incentive Regime for Scientific Research and Innovation (NHR 2.0)

    Julia Mauricio

    Quick Reads

  • Estates Gazette quotes Lynsey Inglis on trends in life sciences real estate investment

    Lynsey Inglis

    In the Press

  • Global Insight quotes Shirley Fu, Tom Wong and Victoria Younghusband on trends in corporate activity in China

    Shirley Fu

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: “It’s the economy, stupid”

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • Hugh Gunson and Cora Hardy write for Tax Journal on the recent changes to the loans to participators regime under FA 2025

    Hugh Gunson

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys successfully defends Super Fast Trading Limited against Bank of Ireland's summary judgment application

    Caroline Greenwell

    News

  • Katie Bewick and Mike Barrington write for Solicitors Journal on how the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 is reshaping UK business practices with new transparency rules

    Katie Bewick

    In the Press

  • The Evolution of Family Office Structures in Hong Kong: A Strategic Guide to Regulatory and Structuring Considerations. Part 2: Structuring Considerations

    Gaven Cheong

    Insights

  • Retail Collection - Episode 3: BDO - Driving Value in an Evolving Market

    James Broadhurst

    Podcasts

  • Bloomberg quotes Piers Master on the suitability of the three-year facility policy designed to attract former UK non-doms

    Piers Master

    In the Press

Back to top