• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Guidance on registered BNG sites

In a joint letter published on 21 July 2024, the Secretary of State for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Steve Reed MP) and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Angela Rayner MP), expressed the importance of sustainability and environmental conservation alongside house building. 

At present, biodiversity net gain (BNG) continues to be a key component of the planning and development process, although there have been questions as to whether it would be better replaced by some form of levy. 

It is now over 7 months since the 10% BNG mandatory requirement for major development came into effect and the body of guidance around BNG is ever evolving. For example, on 21 August 2024, updates to the “Biodiversity net gain: exempt developments” guidance were published, clarifying the criteria a development must meet to qualify for exemption as a self-build or custom build. 

More recently, on 5 September 2024, Natural England published guidance on making amends to and removals of registrations of biodiversity gain sites and amending allocation of off-site biodiversity gains to a development. The guidance confirms there are limited circumstances in which amends may be made to the BNG register. For instance, any change to the register may only be made by the freeholder or leaseholder (or any person who has obtained their written consent). In respect of amending entries on the BNG register the following reasons may permit an application:

  1. Changes to section 106 agreements or conservation covenants which secure the land for BNG purposes for a period of at least 30 years; or 
  2. The site information on the BNG register is incomplete, or inaccurate, for any other reason. 

Furthermore, there are limited circumstances where an application can be made to amend allocations of Offsite Gains i.e. where a developer cannot meet their full BNG requirement on site. The application to amend must be either seek to reduce the size, area or length of an allocated habitat or remove a recorded allocation entirely. Guidance confirms that an application cannot be made to amend an allocation that relates to an extant planning permission. Clear evidence must be provided that the planning permission conditions related to this allocation are no longer in place (e.g. where a permission has lapsed or been revoked) such as a letter from the LPA (although the guidance does not provide examples of what this would look like).

Natural England’s guidance also touches on applications to remove a site from the BNG register. Again, there are limited conditions where these may be made, firstly, the site must not have any partial or full allocations against it. The application must relate to only one gain site, and it must be for the removal of the gain site in its entirety - partial removal of a site is not permitted. 

To conclude, BNG presents an opportunity for landowners and promoters to utilise their land for ecological enhancement as well as creating potential revenue streams. However, the recent government guidance demonstrates that there are limited circumstances where a registration or allocation on the biodiversity gain sites register can be amended.  

Our thinking

  • Modernising Business Tenancies: Where and how should disputes be heard?

    Andrew Ross

    Insights

  • Broker duties, lender liability and secret commission: broking bad

    Rebecca Hollinshead

    Insights

  • The Telegraph quotes Henry Fea on the changes to inheritance tax breaks and the likely impact on family farms in the fictional BBC radio drama 'The Archers'

    Henry Fea

    In the Press

  • Hydrogen Hurdles: navigating the path to net zero in the UK

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Joe Cohen and Aileen Johnson in a feature on ‘GenAI two years on’

    Joe Cohen

    In the Press

  • Navigating UK Financial Services Regulation: A Guide for Insolvency Practitioners

    Daniel Moore

    Insights

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for the Financial Times’ Your Questions column on succession planning

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • An Overview of the Court of Arbitration for Sport

    Benoît Pasquier

    Insights

  • A company can claim privilege against its own shareholder

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • Radiotelevisione svizzera (RSI) interviews Sophie Dworetzsky on the UK non-dom tax changes and the appeal of Switzerland

    Sophie Dworetzsky

    In the Press

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for Wealth Briefing on the assisted dying bill and lessons from financial abuse claims

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • A range of titles including the Financial Times, Daily Telegraph and The Times quote Claire Fallows on M&S receiving approval to demolish its flagship Oxford Street store

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • Neurodiversity and the Law: Creating a Supportive Work Environment

    Briony Richards

    Insights

  • The EU Deforestation Regulation: an update and what it means for companies

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Computer says no [update] - border chaos delayed until April 2025

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • The New UK Net Zero Carbon Buildings Standard 2024 – an ESG milestone?

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

  • The United Arab Emirates – Seeking Remedies for Financial Crime

    James Colautti

    Insights

  • Navigating Cross-Border Bankruptcy: The UK Supreme Court’s Judgment in Kireeva v Bedzhamov [2024] UKSC 39

    Bianca Venkata

    Insights

  • Adverse Possession of Land: Key Points for Landowners, Developers and those working in Strategic Land

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Tamasin Perkins on the assisted dying bill

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

Back to top