• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Guidance on registered BNG sites

In a joint letter published on 21 July 2024, the Secretary of State for the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Steve Reed MP) and Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Angela Rayner MP), expressed the importance of sustainability and environmental conservation alongside house building. 

At present, biodiversity net gain (BNG) continues to be a key component of the planning and development process, although there have been questions as to whether it would be better replaced by some form of levy. 

It is now over 7 months since the 10% BNG mandatory requirement for major development came into effect and the body of guidance around BNG is ever evolving. For example, on 21 August 2024, updates to the “Biodiversity net gain: exempt developments” guidance were published, clarifying the criteria a development must meet to qualify for exemption as a self-build or custom build. 

More recently, on 5 September 2024, Natural England published guidance on making amends to and removals of registrations of biodiversity gain sites and amending allocation of off-site biodiversity gains to a development. The guidance confirms there are limited circumstances in which amends may be made to the BNG register. For instance, any change to the register may only be made by the freeholder or leaseholder (or any person who has obtained their written consent). In respect of amending entries on the BNG register the following reasons may permit an application:

  1. Changes to section 106 agreements or conservation covenants which secure the land for BNG purposes for a period of at least 30 years; or 
  2. The site information on the BNG register is incomplete, or inaccurate, for any other reason. 

Furthermore, there are limited circumstances where an application can be made to amend allocations of Offsite Gains i.e. where a developer cannot meet their full BNG requirement on site. The application to amend must be either seek to reduce the size, area or length of an allocated habitat or remove a recorded allocation entirely. Guidance confirms that an application cannot be made to amend an allocation that relates to an extant planning permission. Clear evidence must be provided that the planning permission conditions related to this allocation are no longer in place (e.g. where a permission has lapsed or been revoked) such as a letter from the LPA (although the guidance does not provide examples of what this would look like).

Natural England’s guidance also touches on applications to remove a site from the BNG register. Again, there are limited conditions where these may be made, firstly, the site must not have any partial or full allocations against it. The application must relate to only one gain site, and it must be for the removal of the gain site in its entirety - partial removal of a site is not permitted. 

To conclude, BNG presents an opportunity for landowners and promoters to utilise their land for ecological enhancement as well as creating potential revenue streams. However, the recent government guidance demonstrates that there are limited circumstances where a registration or allocation on the biodiversity gain sites register can be amended.  

Our thinking

  • Advocacy: Lessons from The Mandela Brief for International Arbitration Today

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

  • LIIARC Tax Investigations Uncovered: Legal Tactics, Courtroom Trends & Strategic Remedies

    Caroline Greenwell

    Events

  • Sarah Jane Boon and Jemimah Fleet write for Today’s Family Lawyer on the repeal of the presumption of parental involvement

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Updates from the Building Safety Regulator - Unblocking the Gateways for Higher Risk Buildings

    Tegan Johnson

    Quick Reads

  • Insights from the latest ABA Technology in M&A Subcommittee meeting – where are recent innovations taking us?

    Daniel Rosenberg

    Quick Reads

  • World Intellectual Property Review quotes Dewdney William Drew on the Getty Images vs Stability AI decision

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • The 1975 Act Turns Fifty: Why Reform was Needed and What Changed

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • ECCTA for Charities: Maintaining Registers

    Giverny McAndry

    Insights

  • ECCTA 2023 - Failure to prevent fraud offence- what charities need to know and do

    Penelope Byatt

    Insights

  • What do agricultural landlords and workers need to know about the Renters’ Rights Act?

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • An introduction to Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 for charities: key changes from 18 November 2025

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Succession Stumbling Blocks: Lessons from Thomas v Countryside Solutions Ltd

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Morning Star UK quotes Julia Cox on the impact of potential inheritance tax rises in the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • What legal developments can the Living Sector expect as we approach the end of 2025 and look ahead to 2026?

    Mark White

    Insights

  • CDR Magazine quotes Jue Jun Lu on China’s newly revised arbitration law

    Jue Jun Lu

    In the Press

  • Andrew Ross and Laura Bushaway write for Property Week on a Supreme Court judgment relating to nuisance

    Andrew Ross

    In the Press

  • Good Divorce Week 2025: Believe it or not, there is a better way

    Emily Borrowdale

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters its Corporate team with the appointment of Ed Morgan

    David Collins

    News

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Sifting the Rumours on Tax Rises and Reforms

    Charlotte Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Adjudication under the Construction Act – a case on the residential occupier exception and contesting the validity of a payless notice

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

Back to top