• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Election results: what does a Labour government mean for the planning system?

min read

After weeks of campaigning, the Labour Party has won a landslide victory in the UK general election. We set out below what a Labour government could mean for the planning system. 

First steps: NPPF changes

The Labour manifesto commits to “immediately” updating the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), to reverse some of the changes introduced by the Conservative Party, including re-instating mandatory housing targets. 

The current version of the NPPF refers to the standard method for assessing housing need as “an advisory starting-point”. It will be hoped by developers that a firmer policy basis for assessing housing need will incentivise local authorities to more readily grant planning permission for residential developments.

The Labour Party has also committed to revising national planning policy to allow for easier delivery of laboratories, digital infrastructure and gigafactories. At this stage we do not have details as to what these will look like, but these types of changes have been welcomed by the life sciences sector. 

Compared to legislative change, amendments to the NPPF can be introduced relatively quickly – so we would expect announcements from Labour on more details for such policy changes within the coming weeks.

Housing and infrastructure: a long term strategy?

Labour has committed to planning reform that would allow for 1.5 million homes to be built over the parliament. This equates to the delivery of 300,000 homes per year – a delivery rate successive governments have promised, but failed to achieve. 

To reach the 1.5 million home target, the Labour Party has committed to: 

  • taking a “brownfield first approach” and fast-tracking developments on urban brownfield sites;
  • preserving high quality greenbelt land while releasing lower quality “grey belt” land for development;
  • building a new generation of new towns in addition to urban extensions and regeneration projects; 
  • strengthening planning obligations and amending the Affordable Homes Programme to allow for delivery of “the biggest increase in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation”; and 
  • unlocking development affected by nutrient neutrality (see our article here for why this is causing delays). 

The Labour Party manifesto has also committed to introducing mechanisms for “cross-boundary strategic planning”. It is hoped that regional planning will allow for coordinated housing delivery at scale.

In terms of infrastructure delivery, Labour has committed to making “major projects faster and cheaper by slashing red tape”. We do not have the details as to how this will be achieved as yet – but again, this is an area to watch.

Thoughts for the future

It is one thing to make commitments in a manifesto and a very different matter to put those policies into practice. Developers have largely welcomed Labour’s proposals for changes to the planning system to date. However, Keir Starmer’s government will now face an uphill battle trying to increase housing delivery and improve delivery rates of infrastructure projects in the context of underfunded local authorities, environmental concerns and anti-development public sentiment (be that NIMBY-ism or otherwise).

The Labour manifesto commitments are not the only planning points the new Government will have to consider. The Government will need to determine whether any of the unimplemented changes proposed by the last government will be taken forward, such as whether the Community Infrastructure Levy will be replaced by a new form of Infrastructure Levy (see our article here).

Can Labour’s proposals be the change so many in the country voted for? We will have to wait and see how many of the promises from the manifesto ultimately make it into the King’s Speech let alone into reality. In our view, if there is any chance of the country delivering 1.5 million homes in the next parliament, a long-term, strategic approach will be required.

The current planning regime acts as a major brake on economic growth

Our thinking

  • Judgement Under Pressure: The General Counsel and In-House Counsel Role in the Built Environment

    Events

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes in Building about the proposed ban on construction retentions

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises longstanding client Hearthstone Investments on its acquisition by Sentinel Real Estate

    Edward Robinson

    News

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Meeyahta Development Limited on the proposed restructuring of Yoma Central Project

    Tun Zaw Mra

    News

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes about the Building Safety Levy in Estates Gazette

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • What Do Landlords Need to Know About the New ‘Register Your Rental Property’ Service?

    Lauren Fraser

    Insights

    min read
  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • The two staircase requirement in England

    Melanie Hardingham

    Insights

    min read
  • Balancing repair against quiet enjoyment

    Sylwia Barchus

    Insights

    min read
  • The Building Safety Levy comes into force – what developers need to know

    Kate Knox

    Insights

    min read
  • Georgina Muskett and Sylwia Barchus examine the strategic use of settlement offers in property disputes, writing in Solicitors Journal

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

    min read
  • Laura Bushaway and Helena Cullwick write in Solicitors Journal about preparing for the private rented sector database

    Laura Bushaway

    In the Press

    min read
  • Francis Ho writes in Building magazine about the process of remediation for residential buildings with unsafe cladding

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top