• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Amendments to the Swiss Civil Procedure Code: Enhancing International Litigation and Streamlining Processes

Switzerland is set to strengthen its position as a global hub for dispute resolution with the upcoming amendments to the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), effective 1st January 2025. The amendments reflect a strategic enhancement of Switzerland’s legal infrastructure to cater to the complexities of international commerce and to make judicial processes more efficient and accessible. Here is what you need to know about the upcoming changes:

Creation of International Commercial Courts

The federal government is paving the way for cantons to establish international commercial courts. These specialised courts will have jurisdiction if (i) at least one party is engaged in commercial activity, (ii) the dispute value is at least CHF 100,000, (iii) the parties consent to the jurisdiction of the commercial court, and (iv) at least one party is domiciled or has a usual place of residence or headquarters abroad at the time of consent. This development is expected to significantly bolster Switzerland’s appeal as a forum for international business disputes, with Zurich and Geneva being prime candidates for hosting such courts.

English as a Procedural Language

The cantons will have the possibility to designate English as the procedural language for international commercial litigation. The Swiss Federal Supreme Court will continue to conduct its proceedings in one of the national languages; however, parties will be permitted to submit legal documents in English.

Reduction of Cost Barriers

To improve access to the courts, a new rule mandates that an advance on court costs cannot exceed half of the estimated total costs, with exceptions for international commercial disputes and other specified cases. Moreover, legal aid will be extended to precautionary evidence proceedings.

State Assumes Risk for Costs

Courts will refund advance payments to the prevailing party, shifting the risk of non-payment by the losing party from the individual to the State. This is a significant change from the current system where the winning party had to recover court costs from the losing party, bearing the risk of default.

Strengthening of Conciliation Procedure

The competence of the conciliation authorities will be broadened, allowing them to generally propose a decision in monetary disputes up to a value of CHF 10,000. This enhancement aims to provide parties with a swift and cost-effective alternative to litigation for lower-value disputes. Moreover, for certain disputes before sole cantonal instances (including commercial courts) voluntary conciliation proceedings will be introduced.

Remote Court Proceedings

Courts will have the discretion to conduct oral proceedings, such as hearings, via electronic means, particularly video conferencing, provided all parties agree and no contrary statutory provisions exist.

Privilege for Internal Legal Services and Corporate Lawyers

A new civil procedural privilege is introduced for activities of a company’s internal legal services. To invoke this privilege, the company must be registered in the Swiss Commercial Register or a comparable foreign register, the legal service must be led by a person qualified to practice law, and the activity must be considered professional for an attorney.

These amendments to the Swiss CPC are a clear indication of Switzerland’s commitment to maintaining its leading role in international dispute resolution and to modernising its judicial system to meet the demands of today’s globalised business environment.

*see link below (but amendments available in German only).

https://www.fedlex.admin.ch/eli/cc/2010/262/en 

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    Events

  • Understanding the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025: Implications for UK Businesses

    Janine Regan

    Insights

  • Maddie Dunn writes for Farmers Guardian on last month’s Spending Review and the Government’s attitude to farming

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

  • ICC Arbitration Statistics 2024 – UAE Breaks into Top 5 Seats

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Why Getty Images v Stability AI Judgment Will Not Answer Our Key Questions

    Nick White

    Insights

  • How does extradition work?

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Extradition in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Food Security is National Security: can regenerative agriculture help fortify the UK?

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Keeping compliant: Navigating SFO regulations globally

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

  • Relocation: Important factors to consider before moving

    Graeme Kleiner

    Insights

  • To share or not to share, that is the question. The Supreme Court hands down judgment in ‘big money’ divorce case Standish v Standish and clarifies the position regarding matrimonialisation and the sharing principle

    Miranda Fisher

    Insights

  • Joseph Evans, Ethan Khurwolah and Simon Heatley write for Thomson Reuters Practical Law on litigation funding and PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • CDR Magazine quotes Simon Le Wita on the Keystone XL pipeline ICSID arbitration

    Simon Le Wita

    In the Press

  • Courts are not couples’ therapists - and that’s a good thing

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • Hague Judgments Convention 2019: Easing cross-border recognition and enforcement of judgments between all UK nations, the EU & beyond from 1 July 2025

    Molly Tatchell

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes highly regarded regulatory and investigations litigator Richard Burger in London

    Richard Burger

    News

  • Liz Gifford, Janine Regan and Courtney Benard write for New Law Journal on an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill which will allow UK charities to send direct marketing emails to supporters without prior opt-in consent

    Liz Gifford

    In the Press

  • Tuition Tussle: Unveiling the VAT Verdict in the Private School Fees Showdown in the case of "ALR and others v Chancellor of the Exchequer Case"

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

  • Litigation funding and PACCAR: reverse, regulate and reform

    Joseph Evans

    Insights

  • Asset Tracing in England and Wales: Legal Tools and Public Resources

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

Back to top