• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Will new powers at Companies House stop or slow down fraudsters?

The Companies House register has long been open to exploitation by criminals seeking to commit fraud, money laundering and other forms of financial crime as a result of some baked-in lack of controls. New measures which came into force earlier this week will help mitigate the risks of UK companies being used for nefarious purposes but they are only a start. 

These measures, the first under the wide-ranging Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023, will enable Companies House to start to tackle fraud and the misuse of the register. It is being hailed as the most significant change to Companies House in its 180-year history.

In summary, the powers (which, crucially, will be complemented by new criminal offences and civil penalties) include: 

  • new rules for registered office addresses (it is no longer possible to use a PO Box as a registered office address); 
  • a requirement for all companies to supply a registered email address; 
  • stronger checks on company names and powers to tackle and remove factually inaccurate information; 
  • greater powers to query information and request supporting evidence; 
  • a requirement for subscribers to confirm that they are forming a company for a lawful purpose when they incorporate, and for a company to confirm its intended future activities will be lawful on its confirmation statement; and 
  • the ability to share data with other government departments and law enforcement agencies. 

Importantly, this is a phased roll out of new powers under the Act and there is still a long way to go. For example, full identity checks on company directors is unlikely to come into force for some time. Further, it will require global cooperation to create a level playing field and to stop criminals shopping around for the easiest jurisdiction to exploit. Criminals are more than happy to forum shop and the exponential growth in fraud across the globe can only be stopped – or at least slowed – if more is done, worldwide, to inhibit criminals’ use of corporate structures.   

These new and enhanced powers are the most significant change for Companies House in our 180-year history

Our thinking

  • Advocacy: Lessons from The Mandela Brief for International Arbitration Today

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

  • LIIARC Tax Investigations Uncovered: Legal Tactics, Courtroom Trends & Strategic Remedies

    Caroline Greenwell

    Events

  • Sarah Jane Boon and Jemimah Fleet write for Today’s Family Lawyer on the repeal of the presumption of parental involvement

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Updates from the Building Safety Regulator - Unblocking the Gateways for Higher Risk Buildings

    Tegan Johnson

    Quick Reads

  • Insights from the latest ABA Technology in M&A Subcommittee meeting – where are recent innovations taking us?

    Daniel Rosenberg

    Quick Reads

  • World Intellectual Property Review quotes Dewdney William Drew on the Getty Images vs Stability AI decision

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • The 1975 Act Turns Fifty: Why Reform was Needed and What Changed

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • ECCTA for Charities: Maintaining Registers

    Giverny McAndry

    Insights

  • ECCTA 2023 - Failure to prevent fraud offence- what charities need to know and do

    Penelope Byatt

    Insights

  • What do agricultural landlords and workers need to know about the Renters’ Rights Act?

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • An introduction to Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 for charities: key changes from 18 November 2025

    Liz Gifford

    Insights

  • Succession Stumbling Blocks: Lessons from Thomas v Countryside Solutions Ltd

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Morning Star UK quotes Julia Cox on the impact of potential inheritance tax rises in the UK Autumn Budget

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • What legal developments can the Living Sector expect as we approach the end of 2025 and look ahead to 2026?

    Mark White

    Insights

  • CDR Magazine quotes Jue Jun Lu on China’s newly revised arbitration law

    Jue Jun Lu

    In the Press

  • Andrew Ross and Laura Bushaway write for Property Week on a Supreme Court judgment relating to nuisance

    Andrew Ross

    In the Press

  • Good Divorce Week 2025: Believe it or not, there is a better way

    Emily Borrowdale

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys further bolsters its Corporate team with the appointment of Ed Morgan

    David Collins

    News

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Sifting the Rumours on Tax Rises and Reforms

    Charlotte Inglis

    Quick Reads

  • Adjudication under the Construction Act – a case on the residential occupier exception and contesting the validity of a payless notice

    Tegan Johnson

    Insights

Back to top