• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Potential parental disputes about school fees should a Labour government add VAT to fees

Parents of children at independent schools will be used to regularly assessing the affordability of school fees against their finances – school fees have increased ahead of inflation for the past 25 years. However, with the next general election approaching, and Labour’s pledge to add VAT to private school fees within their first year of government, families could be hit with significantly increased fees as soon as the next academic year. This change could make private schooling unaffordable for some families and bring about concerns about how easily (and when) a good state alternative could be found. 

This possibility may be especially worrying for separated or divorced parents, who are committed to a court-imposed obligation to discharge school fees until their children reach the end of their secondary education. If Labour do form the next government, there may be increasing numbers of parents who seek to vary their court obligations on the grounds of affordability. 

Separated couples often struggle with funding two households on divorce. The higher earning party may struggle to continue paying school fees if, for example, they are also obliged to pay spousal and child maintenance (as well as solely fund a mortgage on their home). Issues of affordability can also arise years after separation, as children grow older, and one parent wants to send their child to a more expensive school than the other is willing to agree. The decision as to where children are educated falls to both parents to be agreed under their parental responsibility, so disagreements over such issues can lead to litigation – with the court making the ultimate decision. 

However, even in those cases where the court has already made a decision, the addition of VAT onto school fees, especially if schools choose to pass the entire 20% rise in costs onto parents, could arguably be a change of circumstances leading to a parent seeing to vary the court’s previous decision. If, for example, a parent was paying annual school fees of £31,000 (the average cost to send a child to boarding school in 2023), and had three children, they would already be paying £93,000 per annum. A 20% increase on those fees, would push the annual figure closer to £112,000, requiring them to be earning circa £200,000 gross per annum just to cover the cost of the school fees. 

However, there are always risks of returning a matter to court, and a parent seeking to absolve themselves of a school fees liability could find themselves facing a cross-application for increased spousal maintenance (with the other party arguing that their ex-spouse could afford to pay them more maintenance if they were no longer paying school fees).

There may also be issues over timing. Family courts are already overwhelmed with current cases, and an application about the cost of private schooling could take a year to resolve through a court-based process. Meanwhile, some options for the child’s schooling may be “off the table” if applications cannot be made or accepted in time because parents are waiting for the issue to be resolved in court. Over a time-sensitive matter like their child’s education, families might be better served by considering mediation and arbitration, for quicker and arguably less expensive outcomes. 

Our thinking

  • Beyond the Feed: Protecting Children’s Mental Health in Family Proceedings

    Jessica Dawkins

    Quick Reads

  • When the Jellicle Ball Ends: Navigating Pet Ownership on Divorce

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • Agricultural tenancies: back to basics

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • eprivateclient quotes Oliver Little on how tax clarity can help the UK regain confidence among global wealth holders

    Oliver Little

    In the Press

  • Mary Perham and Tristan Tydings write for IFA Magazine on business property relief changes

    Mary Perham

    In the Press

  • Lump sum tax regime: higher annual flat tax and grandfathering provision

    Nicola Saccardo

    Quick Reads

  • 2025: Year in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Quick Reads

  • Family Investment Companies Explained: How Control Shapes Succession Planning

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Maria Cristiana Felisi writes for WeWealth on international couples and Italian matrimonial property regimes

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

  • Hubbis features Jeffrey Lee on the rise of the multi‑hub family office landscape

    Jeffrey Lee

    In the Press

  • QICCA Conciliation Rules 2026 - scope, confidentiality and process at a glance

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • The UK Supreme Court to consider whether adoption orders can be set-aside on the basis of welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Extension of Schedule A1 Inheritance Tax “look‑through” to UK agricultural property

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Miranda Fisher on the rise in arbitration for divorces in England and Wales

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Erell Bauduin comments in VOGUE Business on how leading companies approach succession strategy

    Erell Bauduin

    In the Press

  • Succession Planning in Family Investment Companies: What Should Families Consider?

    Mary Perham

    Quick Reads

  • Family Investment Companies: family values, succession and wealth stewardship

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Through the looking glass - transparency in the family courts (reprised).

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Marcus Yorke-Long comments in Spears on the mediation of family wealth disputes

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    In the Press

  • CGT and Excluded Settlors: Reimbursement Risks for Trustees Post April 2025

    Alice Martin

    Insights

Back to top