• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Michael Gove's announcement on transitional period for two staircase requirement for new residential buildings

In July, in a surprise move, Michael Gove announced that the two staircase requirement for new residential buildings is to be implemented but at a threshold of 18 metres, not 30 metres, bringing England more in line with Scotland, Hong Kong, some cities within the US, Iran and Kenya; with many parts of Europe including Germany, Italy, France, Sweden and Denmark still applying a higher threshold. 

The amendments to Approved Document B are also expected to include a distance and fire resisting separation between entry points to independent staircases, with interlocking staircases being prohibited for this purpose. 

The NFCC welcomed the change saying:

 “This decision marks another significant step in improving the safety of residents and firefighters in high-rise residential buildings across England.”

The NFCC also urged the Government to “take existing buildings into account and make it a requirement to install sprinklers and install or replace evacuation lifts during major refurbishments.”

This followed the DLUHC’s 12 weeks’ consultation launched at the end of 2022, seeking views on a two staircase rule for residential buildings above 30 metres. A proposal which the Greater London Authority rapidly jumped on the back of, with a rule change imposed back in February, resulting in a host of projects being put on hold. The National Fire Chiefs Council, Royal Institute of British Architects and the Chartered Institute of Housing were among a number of organisations who advocated lowering the 30 metres threshold to 18 metres to improve safety both for residents and firefighters during an evacuation, a second staircase removing the risk of a single point of failure and buying critical time for firefighting activities alongside providing residents with multiple escape routes. 

The consultation indicated that the 10 year cost to business would be in the region of £2.5 billion in setting the threshold at 18 metres, up from £1.6 billion if they had gone with the 30 metres threshold. 

With the suggestion that there would be a short transition period for this change to be implemented, a number of existing schemes under 30 metres were expected to be forced into redesign, with figures suggesting over 20,000 new residential units would be caught by the rule change.  

In an update given by Michael Gove on 24 October 2023, the transitional period is now expected to be considerably longer than initially indicated. From the date when the Government publishes and confirms those changes to Approved Document B formally, Gove has announced that:

  • Developers are to have 30 months during which new building regulations applications can choose to conform to either the guidance as it exists today, or to the updated guidance requiring second staircases. 
  • When those 30 months have elapsed, all applications will need to conform to the new guidance. 
  • Any approved applications that do not follow the new guidance will have 18 months for construction to get underway in earnest, failing which, they will have to submit a new building control application, following the new guidance. 

This will mean that for some years to come, England will continue to see new 18metre + single staircase developments. 

 This raises some key questions: 

  • Will we see developers seeking to accelerate existing schemes to bring them within the 30 months’ transitional period?
  • How will developers accommodate the second staircase? Will it be to the detriment of some affordable housing? 
  • Will some schemes become unavailable due to increased costs and a reduction in saleable floor space?
  • For schemes which are in the offing already and are not required to accommodate the two staircase rule, will potential investors or insurers have less appetite for such schemes? 

We are tracking developments on our Building and Fire Safety Hub. If you have any queries about building safety, please do not hesitate to contact Melanie Hardingham or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact.

 

“This decision marks another significant step in improving the safety of residents and firefighters in high-rise residential buildings across England.”

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Unpacking the Horizon IT Scandal: Ethical Decision‑Making in Conversation with Dr Karen Nokes

    Megan Paul

    Events

  • Understanding Vacant Possession: A Key Element in Property Transactions

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • Year of the Horse Celebration

    Edith Lai

    Events

  • Martyn’s Law: What Historic Houses Need to Know

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Chandni Pandya contributes to an Estates Gazette Q&A on the modification of restrictive covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    In the Press

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Members of joint ventures cannot unilaterally bring adjudication proceedings on behalf of their joint venture

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • Understanding risk-based human rights due diligence

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • Residential PEEPs Breakfast Panel

    Richard Flenley

    Events

  • Commonhold: Best Supporting Tenure or Leading Role?

    Sarah Bradd

    Quick Reads

  • AI and Data Protection

    Victor Mound

    Insights

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Biodiversity Net Gain: VAT considerations for Land Managers

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Dewdney William Drew comments in Business Green on a recent UK Supreme Court ruling that has effectively prohibited Oatly from using the word 'milk' in its marketing

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

  • Construction News quotes Francis Ho on John Lewis shelving its build-to-rent property plans

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Navigating ESG Regulatory Change in Supply Chain Contracts

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Sally Ashford comments in Spear's, IFA Magazine, and eprivateclient on the UK Spring Statement

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

Back to top