• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

A warning to all businesses: significant fine underscores the importance of maintaining workplace Health & Safety

A Pret a Manger employee was trapped in a walk-in freezer for two and a half hours on 29 July 2021. She was found in a state of distress, experiencing difficulty breathing and having lost sensation in her legs and feet. She was subsequently treated for hypothermia.

An investigation by Westminster City Council found that a suitable risk assessment had not been carried out. Pret a Manger was prosecuted, and last month, the company was fined £800,000 and ordered to pay an additional £23,667 in costs.

The fine, and the publicity it has attracted, stands as a salient reminder that all businesses must maintain a dynamic approach to health and safety in the workplace, including the continuous review of policies, procedures and facilities. Crucially, business must act promptly and proactively when they receive warnings or become aware of issues which may pose a potential health and safety risk. 

Under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, employers have a duty to minimise risks to health in the workplace so far as reasonably practicable. The particular risks relating to In temperature-controlled environments have been highlighted by the Health and Safety Executive which identifies the importance of being able to open doors to walk-in freezers from the inside and recommends installing trapped person alarms where appropriate. Further guidance in the British Standard BS 7915:1998 ‘Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Guide to design and evaluation of working practices for cold indoor working environments’ also underlines the necessity of conducting a risk assessment to identify appropriate precautions, such as personal protective equipment at lower temperatures.

This particular incident was preceded by several callouts in the 19 months beforehand due to ineffective internal push buttons, including a previous occasion at this same location in January 2020, where an employee was locked in a freezer after the internal door release mechanism malfunctioned.

Pret entered a guilty plea to an offence contrary to the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The District Judge initially considered a fine of £1.6m, taking into account the failure to act on previous warnings.  However, the fine was subsequently reduced after consideration of Pret a Manger’s early plea and its mitigation.  This included the full review which Pret a Manger had carried out following the incident. It had also worked with the manufacturer of the fridge to prevent recurrence, including revisiting all existing systems and, where appropriate, enhancing these processes.

Our thinking

  • 20 YEARS OF LGBTQ+ HISTORY MONTH: 20 INFLUENTIAL FIGURES YOU SHOULD KNOW

    Emma Smart

    Quick Reads

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to unfair prejudice petitions

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • New food and drink ads regulation & impact on live sports broadcasts

    Sarah Johnson

    Insights

  • AML in decentralized finance and traditional finance

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Puma Growth Partners on its lead investment as part of a $4.3 million funding round for finance-focused legal AI specialist, Semeris

    David Coates

    News

  • Has the UAE recognised the principle of Without Prejudice Privilege?

    Maher Al Nashar

    Quick Reads

  • Appointment of company directors – who can do it and how?

    Stephen Burns

    Insights

  • A Digital Pound: The Bank of England January 2025 Update

    Racheal Muldoon

    Insights

  • VAT Zero-rating: Dwellings or RRP – which is best for student accommodation?

    Elizabeth Hughes

    Insights

  • Government consultation on implementation of the DMCC Act’s subscription contracts regime

    Dillon Ravikumar

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys finds that over half of Gen Z say the Bank of Mum and Dad comes with strings attached

    Sally Ashford

    News

  • The Financial Times reports on our independent survey of Gen Z adults and quotes Sally Ashford on the influence of the Bank of Mum and Dad and potential strings attached

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Consultation on further changes to compulsory purchase process and compensation: making compulsory acquisition easier

    Claire Fallows

    Insights

  • Revised NPPF – the Green Belt, Grey Belt and the Golden Rules

    Titilope Hassan

    Quick Reads

  • Key Planning Decisions in 2024

    Sophie Willis

    Insights

  • Understanding Contempt of Court in Swiss Law: Key Provisions and Penalties

    Remo Wagner

    Insights

Back to top