• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

A warning to all businesses: significant fine underscores the importance of maintaining workplace Health & Safety

min read

A Pret a Manger employee was trapped in a walk-in freezer for two and a half hours on 29 July 2021. She was found in a state of distress, experiencing difficulty breathing and having lost sensation in her legs and feet. She was subsequently treated for hypothermia.

An investigation by Westminster City Council found that a suitable risk assessment had not been carried out. Pret a Manger was prosecuted, and last month, the company was fined £800,000 and ordered to pay an additional £23,667 in costs.

The fine, and the publicity it has attracted, stands as a salient reminder that all businesses must maintain a dynamic approach to health and safety in the workplace, including the continuous review of policies, procedures and facilities. Crucially, business must act promptly and proactively when they receive warnings or become aware of issues which may pose a potential health and safety risk. 

Under the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, employers have a duty to minimise risks to health in the workplace so far as reasonably practicable. The particular risks relating to In temperature-controlled environments have been highlighted by the Health and Safety Executive which identifies the importance of being able to open doors to walk-in freezers from the inside and recommends installing trapped person alarms where appropriate. Further guidance in the British Standard BS 7915:1998 ‘Ergonomics of the thermal environment - Guide to design and evaluation of working practices for cold indoor working environments’ also underlines the necessity of conducting a risk assessment to identify appropriate precautions, such as personal protective equipment at lower temperatures.

This particular incident was preceded by several callouts in the 19 months beforehand due to ineffective internal push buttons, including a previous occasion at this same location in January 2020, where an employee was locked in a freezer after the internal door release mechanism malfunctioned.

Pret entered a guilty plea to an offence contrary to the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974. The District Judge initially considered a fine of £1.6m, taking into account the failure to act on previous warnings.  However, the fine was subsequently reduced after consideration of Pret a Manger’s early plea and its mitigation.  This included the full review which Pret a Manger had carried out following the incident. It had also worked with the manufacturer of the fridge to prevent recurrence, including revisiting all existing systems and, where appropriate, enhancing these processes.

Our thinking

  • TCC allows Building Liability Order based on an Adjudicator’s Decision and an ‘Anticipatory’ Building Liability Order

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

    min read
  • Corporate human rights due diligence – episode 2: practical insights from the experts

    Kerry Stares

    Podcasts

  • The Sky’s the Limit: Arbitrating Aviation Disputes

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

    min read
  • eprivateclient features an article by Matt Foster and Sarah Moore on untangling crypto assets in divorce

    Matt Foster

    In the Press

    min read
  • 10 ways the new APR/BPR rules affect estate administration

    Mary Perham

    Insights

    min read
  • Clarification given by the Court of Appeal on rights of first refusal under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987

    Natalie Deuchar

    Insights

    min read
  • Choosing the Right PISCES Platform for Private Company Liquidity

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • How to construe contentious trusts - lessons from recent cases

    Sarah Moore

    Insights

    min read
  • Q&A: Modifying Restrictive Covenants

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

    min read
  • Grid Connections, Environmental Assessment and the DCO Process – What is the effect of the Raeshaw Farms judgement?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Construction News and Facilities Management Now quote William Turner, Elizabeth Hughes, and Alexander Hemmings on new Construction Industry Scheme rules for supply chain fraud

    Elizabeth Hughes

    In the Press

    min read
  • Q&A: Boundary Issues

    Emma Preece

    Insights

    min read
  • Remedy and Leverage: Addressing Human Rights Risks in Corporate Supply Chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • How is the UK Construction Industry Impacted by Modern Slavery?

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

    min read
  • Martyn’s Law: What Historic Houses Need to Know

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

    min read
  • Application for modification of restrictive covenant fails on “worst case” scenario

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

    min read
  • Social risks in the supply chain – from due diligence to resilience: Corporate human rights due diligence – a snapshot of the law in EU/UK

    Kerry Stares

    Podcasts

  • The 1975 Act 50 Years On: Looking Back and Looking Forward

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

    min read
  • Growing investor focus on human rights and social sustainability

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Engaging Suppliers on Carbon Emissions Reduction: 5 Tips to Set You Up For Success

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
Back to top