• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The Family Fund: Bank of Mum & Dad 2.0

min read

With it becoming increasingly difficult for young people to get on the property ladder due to high interest rates, lack of affordable housing, and the need to find a significant deposit, it is unsurprising that parents are being asked to help their children buy their first home. This has been a long-standing practice in Hong Kong and in the UK.  

It can also be difficult to obtain a mortgage when moving to a different country where there is no credit rating, residency or employment history. This may be the case with couples who have lived abroad for many years and seek to go back to their home country later in life.

Recently published figures in the UK have shown that over 318,000 homes were purchased with financial support from family members this year alone, with the average financial support coming in at £25,600.

However, it is not just stopping with the bank of mum and dad. Grandparents and more affluent older siblings are also now being 'recruited to the cause' and to help provide deposits. 

Making such gifts can place significant financial stress on older family members, particularly if they have to withdraw equity from their own homes to pass on to their children, or rely on savings which were intended for their retirement. As home ownership has declined through the generations, fewer parents are in a financial position to assist, hence the call for help from siblings.

What can easily be forgotten however is what happens to those funds in the event the family member to whom the gift was made subsequently divorces from their husband or wife. If the funds went into a property which subsequently became a family home, and the marriage lasted many years, at least half of those funds may be lost in the divorce. 

Where significant funds have been provided, it is sensible to consider a prenuptial or post-nuptial agreement to ensure that in the unfortunate event of a divorce, the family funds provided to buy the home are not divided with the other spouse. 

Alternatively, other structures should be considered, such as the parents or sibling taking a legal and/or beneficial interest in the property equivalent to the funds advanced, or the money simply being loaned, rather than gifted, with a clear loan agreement in place. 

It is important to have proper documentary evidence, and a clear paper trail to show the source of funding, to avoid any allegations that the loan was a 'soft loan' which would not be enforced.

"Family wealth is increasingly becoming a prerequisite for home ownership, effectively locking some groups out of the housing market for years while they save for deposits, or even altogether'

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Surveyors' Refresher Seminar

    Hope Barton

    Events

    min read
  • Right to Work Reforms Webinar

    Kelvin Tanner

    Events

    min read
  • Arbitration of Trust Disputes Webinar

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

    min read
  • Building Safety Update Seminar

    David Savage

    Events

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi writes in We Wealth about the treatment of joint bank accounts on inheritance

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • What could the Law Commission’s proposals on the rights of first refusal mean for office occupiers?

    David Haines

    Insights

    min read
  • Birthright citizenship changes and US surrogacy: what UK and Swiss intended parents need to know

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client BioMed Realty on Jagex's move to Granta Park

    Amy Shuttleworth

    News

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • World Trademark Review quotes Robert Lundie Smith on the High Court’s $11.6 million damages award to Swatch

    Robert Lundie Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys appoints Justine Howard as General Counsel

    Justine Howard

    News

    min read
  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys celebrates US team recognition in Best Lawyers in America® 2027

    Karen Yates

    News

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Easy Escape: The Court confirms test to restrain a call on an on-demand performance bond

    Sara Cunningham

    Insights

    min read
  • Diversification, safe havens and the pivot to Asia for US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top