• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Treasury Committee endorses mandatory venture capital diversity policies from 2025

In a report published last month, the Treasury Committee recommended the government take swift action to further promote diversity in the UK’s venture capital (VC) industry, advising funds to target female and ethnic minority founders as well as businesses outside of London.

“An engine of economic modernisation and growth”

VC was described in the report as an “engine of economic modernisation and growth”, and is recognised as playing a crucial role in the UK’s economy by the Committee, who urged the government to renew successful state support measures – in particular, tax relief schemes specifically targeted at VC activity – beyond their expiry in 2025.

The benefits of tax relief schemes (specifically, the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS), the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme (SEIS) and Venture Capital Trusts (VCTs)) was a point of focus in the report, in particular due to the schemes’ ability to attract global investors to the UK over competitor markets. The Committee identified that a further benefit of the schemes’ popularity was their potential to “achieve better diversity and inclusion capital”, with proposed policies to implement from April 2025 including:

  • a mandatory requirement for VC firms to disclose the gender and ethnic breakdown of their employees and funding recipients in order to be eligible for EIS, SEIS or VCTs; and
  • a “comply or explain” condition of EIS, SEIS or VCT eligibility requiring VC firms to either comply with the Women in Finance Charter and Investing in Women Code or justify why not.

Venturing beyond London

The Committee further recommended using the popularity of EIS, SEIS and VCTs to attract VC investors towards opportunities in the regions and nations outside of London, which it noted only accounts for 19% of the UK’s small to mid-size enterprises.

The report identified potential obstacles in the form of EIS and VCTs’ time limits, known as “sunset clauses”. Although both schemes are available nation-wide, part of their criteria is that eligible firms be no older than seven years from their first commercial sale, or 10 years for “knowledge intensive companies”. 

The Committee advised this disproportionately affects regional firms, who on average take longer to become established in part due to more limited resources. Consequently, a further proposed amendment to the tax relief schemes is to remove the sunset clauses with effect from April 2025, with the objective of removing any disadvantage to regional firms.

A future-facing industry

With the Committee’s recommendations echoing policies pioneered by industry thought-leaders such as Cornerstone VC, a black-led angel investor group which has consistently endorsed collection and publication of diversity data, the report is an optimistic indication of progress.

Whether the government implements such policies, it is clear that there is an industry-wide appetite for positive action far sooner than April 2025.

Firms must be compelled to reveal their diversity data when applying to these tax reliefs in an effort to increase transparency and drive change.

Our thinking

  • Blazing a Trail in Real Estate: Inspiring Female Leaders of the Future

    Georgina Muskett

    Events

  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • Nuisance claims: A recent decision highlights the key role of expert evidence

    Matt Cordwent

    Insights

  • Clarity on Practice Direction No.1 of 2025 in employment law proceedings

    Nick Hurley

    Quick Reads

  • Luxembourg Business Registers Reform: Enhanced Compliance Controls and Progressive Sanctions Now in Effect

    Victor Regnard

    Quick Reads

  • Q&A: Signs and rights of way

    Oliver Park

    Insights

  • Conway v Conway: Proprietary Estoppel, Family Promises and the Limits of Informality

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Joe Edwards and Laura Bushaway write for Property Week on changes to possession actions

    Joe Edwards

    In the Press

  • New statutory guidance on the Modern Slavery Act 2015 for supply chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

  • The UK Supreme Court to consider whether adoption orders can be set-aside on the basis of welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Extension of Schedule A1 Inheritance Tax “look‑through” to UK agricultural property

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • Freezing Orders: how are they enforced around the world? England and Wales perspective

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Miranda Fisher on the rise in arbitration for divorces in England and Wales

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Saudi Arabia’s 2025 Expropriation Law: What Has Changed?

    Ahmad Anani

    Quick Reads

  • Erell Bauduin comments in VOGUE Business on how leading companies approach succession strategy

    Erell Bauduin

    In the Press

  • Through the looking glass - transparency in the family courts (reprised).

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Marcus Yorke-Long comments in Spears on the mediation of family wealth disputes

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    In the Press

  • The Results are in: AI on the Front Line of Alcohol Advertising Regulation

    Evie O'Connor

    Quick Reads

  • Technology Sector Lookahead 2026

    Mark Bailey

    Insights

  • Food & Beverage Lookahead 2026

    Rachel Bell

    Insights

Back to top