• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

A brief look at HMRC v A Taxpayer [2023] UKUT 00182 (TCC)

The Upper Tribunal judgment in HMRC v A Taxpayer [2023] UKUT 00182 (TCC) has recently been published. This is a new episode in what seems likely to become a long-running soap opera, featuring private jets, alcohol abuse and headlice.

The case concerns when an individual is considered to be resident in the UK in a tax year. This issue is determined by the statutory residence test (SRT).

Day-counting is central to the SRT. Under the SRT, the general rule is that an individual is treated as being in the UK on a particular day if he/she is in the UK on that day at midnight. However, there are several reliefs under which presence in the UK at midnight can be disregarded.

One such relief applies to presence in the UK due to exceptional circumstances beyond the individual’s control, which prevented the individual from leaving the UK. Up to 60 days in the relevant tax year can be left out of account by virtue of this relief, where the applicable conditions are met.

This relief has been the subject of recent litigation between HMRC and a taxpayer whose identity has not been disclosed in the judgments. The taxpayer won her case against HMRC at first instance. However, the Upper Tribunal has overturned the first instance decision, holding that on the facts, the conditions of the relief were not satisfied.

The taxpayer exceeded her normal allowance of days in the UK because her sister was suffering from alcoholism and depression, and was neglecting her young children. The taxpayer’s case was that she was under a moral duty to fly into the UK to look after her sister, and to take care of the children, who were living in squalor. However, there seems to have been a degree of flakiness in the taxpayer’s evidence as to what she was doing in the UK on the relevant days, which has undoubtedly coloured the Upper Tribunal’s decision. The tribunal may also have been unsympathetic because the taxpayer was formerly UK resident and had received shares from her still UK resident husband, presumably to secure a tax saving on dividends which were paid on those shares.

Other individuals who may wish to rely on the exceptional circumstances relief will be concerned by three features of the Upper Tribunal's decision:

(1) Its narrow interpretation of what circumstances count as exceptional;

(2) The view that circumstances which would otherwise not be exceptional cannot become exceptional due to the addition of a moral obligation; and

(3) Its narrow interpretation of ‘prevent’. In the Upper Tribunal’s view, an individual is only prevented from leaving the UK, for the purposes of the relief, if he/she is completely unable to leave. A mere impediment to the individual leaving, or pressure on him/her not to leave, do not count.

Taken individually, none of these points is obviously wrong. However, their cumulative effect is to give the exceptional circumstances relief a very narrow ambit.

The First-tier Tribunal had said in its judgment that the relief should not be construed more narrowly than the statutory wording requires, and should be interpreted in a manner which gives effect to Parliament’s intention when the relief was built into the SRT. However, determining Parliament’s intention is a notoriously difficult exercise, into which subjectivity inevitably intrudes. The Upper Tribunal’s reading is based on an assumption that Parliament would have wanted to take a tough line on individuals who ‘overstay’, except where such individuals have a cast iron excuse that they were compelled to do so, by circumstances which were exceptional and outside their control.

This is a potentially very important case for individuals who may find themselves in predicaments of this kind. For a more detailed discussion, please see here.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2024

    Charlotte Ford


  • Record number of leading individuals for Charles Russell Speechlys in Chambers High-Net-Worth 2024

    Piers Master


  • Hubbis interviews Jeffrey Lee on the growth of our Singapore office

    Jeffrey Lee

    In the Press

  • Bloomberg quotes Sarah Jane Boon on plans announced in the King’s speech to press ahead with the tax hike on UK private school fees

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • “We want prenup! We want prenup!” (Yeah!)

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • RTHK Money Talk interviews Lisa Wong and Vanessa Duff on wealth preservation and managing overseas financial liabilities

    Lisa Wong

    In the Press

  • Citywealth quotes Robert Blower and Oliver Little on the intersection between trust structures and Sharia law

    Robert Blower

    In the Press

  • IFA Magazine quotes Sarah Jane Boon on Labour’s pledge to add VAT to private school fees within their first year in government

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • I now pronounce you husband and wife (hopefully…..)

    Jemimah Fleet

    Quick Reads

  • That’s not my name – Brangelina’s daughter Shiloh files to drop Pitt from her surname

    Zandra Beaumont

    Quick Reads

  • Spear's quotes Julia Cox on the Autumn Statement providing greater clarity for HNWIs post-election result

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • So Keir we are - how will a Labour government affect (property) investment in healthcare

    Mark White

    Quick Reads

  • The Telegraph quotes Tristram van Lawick on the strength of the country estate market

    Tristram van Lawick

    In the Press

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Switzerland strengthens its Family Law practice with the promotion of Sirin Yüce to Partner

    Michael Wells-Greco


  • Relocating to Switzerland: key points

    Grégoire Uldry


  • “My father was a toolmaker”; “My father was a GP” – The election politics of families

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • London Property Market Prediction: Where and why are Chinese buyers buying residential properties in London in the next 12 months?

    Simon Green


  • Sarah Jane Boon quoted on the front page of The Times in relation to ONS marriage figures for England and Wales

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

  • Property Patter: Hotels

    Naomi Nettleton


  • "Has anyone seen my cat?" - Pet-Nups and Pet Disputes between Unmarried Couples

    Jessie Davies

    Quick Reads

Back to top