• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Do I really need listed building consent?

min read

If your property is listed by Historic England as a listed property (generally referred to as Grade I, Grade II or Grade III listed), you will need to obtain listed building consent before starting any internal or external works to your property. Failure to obtain listed building consent is not simply a headache when you come to sell your property, it is a criminal offence.

While not all building works will require listed building consent, ‘demolition or works of alteration or extension that affect the character of the building as a building of special architectural or historic interest’ (1) will require listed building consent from your local authority. Both those who carried out the works and those who arranged the works will be found liable and could receive a penalty of up to two years’ imprisonment or an unlimited fine. 

It is not sufficient to state that it was not known if listed building consent was needed. The offence will still be deemed to have occurred (but an exception can be made if the works were needed in the interests of health and safety or to preserve the building).

To rectify such illegal works, a local authority may issue a listed building enforcement notice. This notice will force a property owner to either remove the unauthorised works or to restore the property to its initial state.

Should you carry out works to your property (without obtaining the correct consents) and then move to sell your property, the new owner will be liable for any listed building enforcement notices that are served on the property. As the owner of the property is responsible for responding to the notice, should they fail to do so they will be deemed to have committed the offence (even if they were in no way related to the works to the property).

This year, a London landowner was fined £20,000 for failing to comply with a listed building consent at 103 Bow Road, Tower Hamlets. The property was a Grade II listed building and was part of a row of townhouses which were listed in 1973.  The landowner had begun renovations to the property which included a large extension and the installation of an uPVC window. The landowner not only failed to obtain listed building consent, but the local council looked unfavourably on the works as they were done to provide poor-quality housing. The council served the notice demanding the removal of the extension and the uPVC window (to be replaced with a traditional sash window). The landowner failed to comply with both these requests, plead guilty at the local magistrates’ Court and was subsequently fined.

Obtaining the correct planning permissions and listed building consents are vital should you own a listed building and wish to renovate it. Without the correct consents you are not only committing a criminal offence but you are also ‘letting the door’ open for any future owner to be liable for criminal offences. This can in turn frustrate sales and affect the marketability of your property.

(1) Historic England: Criminal Offences: Listed Buildings and Other Heritage Assets

The law contains a number of criminal offences aimed at protecting historic buildings and sites and at ensuring the appropriate consents are sought when necessary.

Our thinking

  • What Wadworth Tells Us About the Next Phase of PISCES

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Supply chain: social audits

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
  • Building Safety Levy: What Do the Proposed 2026 Amendments Mean?

    Mark Barley

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Shaping the Future of AIM: What the New AIM Rules Mean for Growth Companies, Founders and Advisers

    Paul Arathoon

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys has advised long-standing client Derwent London on its building contract with Multiplex for the development of 50 Baker Street

    Fiona Edmond

    News

    min read
  • Default interest in loan agreements: The Court of Appeal provides further guidance

    James Walton

    Insights

    min read
  • Maddie Dunn writes in The Grocer on the UK government’s recently published Farming Roadmap

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

    min read
  • No Trivial Matter: What Todd v Marsh Tells Us About Informal Boundary Agreements

    Bella Preece

    Insights

    min read
  • Ofgem proposes to increase costs and tighten grid connection procedures for larger data centre projects

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long-standing client Puma Growth Partners as it led an £11 million funding round into MOTH, a UK based drinks brand

    David Coates

    News

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys reports strong firmwide revenue growth, with 10% increase to £266.5m

    Simon Ridpath

    News

    min read
  • Extra Time: The Changing Face Of Sport And Law

    Darren Bailey

    Podcasts

  • Is there a presumption of equal shared care for children?

    Jamie Kennaugh

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charging Ahead: What Landlords Need to Know About EVCP Leases

    Nicholas Wyatt

    Insights

    min read
  • Home and Dry: How Elborne Kept the Taxman at the Door

    Ethan Khurwolah

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • A Roadmap at last – but does it go far enough?

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Close Company Reporting

    Tanwen Evans-Balch

    Insights

    min read
  • Implications of the Amended EU Deforestation Regulation for businesses and supply chains

    Kerry Stares

    Insights

    min read
Back to top