• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Machinery Regulations respond to the rise of AI

In 2006, the European Machinery Directive (Directive 2006/42/EC) was introduced to ensure safe machinery in the EU market while allowing for the free movement of such machinery. The directive promoted the inherently safe design and construction of machinery, as well as proper installation and maintenance. However, the ever-increasing impact of the internet on our lives and the rise of digital technologies such as artificial intelligence and robotics have presented new safety challenges that were not addressed in the original directive.

To tackle these challenges, on 21 April 2021, the European Commission proposed a new regulation on machinery products as part of its wider artificial intelligence package. The proposed revision aims to enhance safety for traditional technologies, ensure a more coherent interpretation of scope and definitions, reassess high-risk machines and conformity assessment procedures, reduce paper-based requirements for documentation, ensure coherence with other product safety legislation, and avoid divergences in interpretation stemming from transposition.

Though the EU Withdrawal Act preserved the implementation of the 2006 Directive through the Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 2008, it is worth noting that the new regulation will apply to EU member states only and will not apply to the UK without the introduction of new UK legislation to that effect.

On 15 December 2022, the European Parliament and European Council reached a provisional agreement on the new regulation. Following this, the European Permanent Representatives Committee approved the agreement on 25 January 2023, and the European Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO) approved the agreement on 2 March 2023 by 36 votes in favour and one abstention.

The next step will be a vote in plenary on the European Parliament's first reading position, which is expected to take place shortly. Once adopted, the new regulation will be a significant step in ensuring the safety of machinery products in the EU market, with a particular focus on Artificial Intelligence.

Post-Brexit, the UK Government has the freedom to decide whether to align itself with the EU or pursue its own path. A recent Government white paper on AI regulation suggests that the UK may diverge from the EU’s standpoint. Rather than taking a broad approach encompassing all sectors, the UK Government is prioritising the empowerment of existing regulators to develop tailored approaches that suit the applications of AI in their sectors. The Government has outlined five guiding principles for AI usage: safety, transparency, fairness, accountability, and contestability.

This approach is intended to allow the UK's rules to adapt as the technology develops, ensuring public protections without hindering businesses from using AI technology to deliver “stronger economic growth, better jobs, and bold new discoveries that radically improve people's lives”. UK regulators will provide practical guidance and resources to organisations in the next 12 months, and when parliamentary time allows, legislation could be introduced to ensure regulators consistently consider the five principles.

This approach will mean the UK’s rules can adapt as this fast-moving technology develops, ensuring protections for the public without holding businesses back from using AI technology to deliver stronger economic growth, better jobs, and bold new discoveries that radically improve people’s lives.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2024

    Charlotte Ford

    Events

  • Collateral Warranty and Third Party Rights: Everything You Need to Know

    Chris Marks

    Insights

  • Supreme Court overturns Court of Appeal decision: Statutory adjudication will not apply to a typical collateral warranty

    Kevin Forsyth

    Insights

  • IET’s new revision 7 of the Model Form of Contract (MF/1): What has changed?

    Melanie Tomlin

    Insights

  • Game On for Hong Kong’s Sports Arbitration

    Patrick Chan

    Insights

  • Darren Bailey and Frédéric Jeannin write for City AM on geopolitical risk and challenges posed to Paris by staging the Olympic Games

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

  • CoStar quotes Claire Fallows and Ben Butterworth on some of the key real estate issues addressed in the King's Speech

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • Company Representation in Swiss Conciliation Hearings: Who Holds the Reins?

    Remo Wagner

    Insights

  • “We want prenup! We want prenup!” (Yeah!)

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • Insolvency Insights: Maximising Recovery – DIFC Courts actions in aid of foreign liquidations

    Nicola Jackson

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys reports domestic and international growth across all practice areas

    Simon Ridpath

    News

  • The EU AI Act: A Beginner’s Guide for UK and International Businesses using AI

    Janine Regan

    Insights

  • ADGM Court holds that NMC can bring fraudulent and wrongful trading claims retroactively

    Nicola Jackson

    Quick Reads

  • When does new safety regime apply to commercial units?

    Emma Humphreys

    Insights

  • What is the purpose? A landmark ruling in Hong Kong on Quistclose trusts and insolvency

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Personnel Today quotes Nick Hurley on what Labour's election win means for employment law

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • So Keir we are - how will a Labour government affect (property) investment in healthcare

    Mark White

    Quick Reads

  • First QFC Court Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitral Awards

    Alim Khamis FCIArb

    Insights

  • Will 2024 be a record year for the number of insolvencies in France?

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Election Countdown: What might a Labour government mean for UK business?

    Caroline Carter

    Insights

Back to top