• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Jennison v Jennison – a win for foreign executors dealing with English assets

min read

In the recent case of Jennison v Jennison [2022] EWCA Civ 1682, the English Court of Appeal (EWCA) ruled on the standing of an executor appointed under a foreign will to issue proceedings in the English courts before obtaining an English grant of probate or an English reseal of a foreign grant. 

The facts 

The claimant (Mrs Jennison) issued proceedings in the English courts for breaches of trust relating to English land comprised in her husband’s (the Deceased) estate, 10 years after a grant of probate (the Grant) had been issued in her favour in New South Wales, Australia (NSW). The Grant was resealed in England after the proceedings were issued, but before trial. The defendants contested that foreign probate conferred no jurisdiction over the Deceased’s English assets and that the claim was therefore null and void. 

Issues for the EWCA

The EWCA considered:

  1. Whether resealing a foreign grant of probate had retrospective effect; and
  2. Whether Mrs Jennison’s title to the claim derived from her appointment as executor under the foreign will.

The EWCA also considered whether CPR Part 3.10 could be used to validate a nullity, but this is not discussed further.

Commentary

On the first issue the EWCA concluded that a reseal of a foreign grant of probate did not have retrospective effect, and therefore only operates from the date of the resealing. In this case, a retrospective reseal would mean that the claim could not be null and void as resealing the Grant would have applied retrospectively back to the date proceedings were issued.

On the second issue, the EWCA applied the longstanding rule in Chetty v Chetty [1916] that, under English law, an executor’s title derives from the testator’s appointment by will, and not from the grant of probate, the latter only being a necessary mechanism to prove title. The EWCA explored whether this applied to all foreign executors or only in circumstances where, as is the case under English law, the law of the testator’s domicile provides that the executor’s title derives from the will. NSW law differs to English law and an executor’s title derives from probate, not the will. However, the EWCA confirmed that English law could diverge from NSW law and found in favour of Mrs Jennison ruling that, in spite of the Grant, her title to the Deceased’s English assets was governed by English law, and therefore her title derived from the Deceased’s will.

This case demonstrates that foreign executors of a foreign will dealing with English assets are entitled to bring claims in the English courts irrespective of whether an English grant has been issued, or a foreign grant resealed, albeit that such a grant will be necessary in order to prove title.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Giorgia Ligasacchi writes in We Wealth about collectors, Matthew Wong's artworks, and the contemporary art scene

    Giorgia Ligasacchi

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys Opens New York Office and Connecticut Practice

    Simon Ridpath

    News

    min read
  • US Citizens moving to the UK part 8: Key considerations in relation to child arrangements

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Why domicile still matters after the 2025 IHT changes

    Harriet Betteridge

    Insights

    min read
  • Retirement without a pension?

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 7: Will my US prenuptial agreement be binding in England and Wales?

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • China's New Outbound Investment Regulation: Key Changes and What They Mean for Investors

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

    min read
  • Nicola Saccardo speaks to TopLegal on the growth of Charles Russell Speechlys’ Italian practice

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Recalibrating England’s rental market: The Renters’ Rights Act

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

    min read
  • Sarah Jane Boon answers a Financial Times reader's question on the legal implications of a destination wedding

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

    min read
  • Yacine Diallo discusses Luxembourg holding structures on Le Family Office podcast

    Yacine Diallo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Cristiana Felisi comments on preventing conflict in entrepreneurial families and large estates for We Wealth

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

    min read
  • Wealth Structuring Developments In Switzerland

    Alexia Egger Castillo

    Insights

    min read
  • Why families use Family Investment Companies (FICs)?

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Nicola Saccardo speaks to Spear's on cross-border divorce and succession in Italy

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Planning roadmap for expats in Switzerland (2026) Part Three

    Sophie Hart

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 5: Healthcare, banking and housing

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • ‘Sharenting’ and consent – UAE ruling on posting photos of children online

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • ‘Don’t Lose Ur Head’…But It Might Lose You Money: Conduct in the No-Fault Divorce Era

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

    min read
Back to top