• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

New and enhanced EPR framework: more stringent responsibilities on producers – what does this mean for your business?

min read

In 2019 the UK government committed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by at least 100% of 1990 levels by 2050 under the Climate Change Act 1990 – the UK ‘net zero target’. Then in 2021 the UK government published its Net Zero Strategy ‘Build Back Greener’, which set out a plan to decarbonise all sectors of the UK economy to meet the 2050 net zero target.

A significant part of achieving this goal is approaching and reforming the way we deal with plastic, including production and waste. Globally, we produce 400 million tons of plastic per year, a figure set to quadruple by 2050. Producing and disposing of plastic results in huge greenhouse gas emissions and adversely impacts ecosystems, with a particular effect on marine animals that ingest it in the form of microplastics. Combatting plastic waste is crucial to achieve the UK's net zero target and is certainly the driving factor behind the reform of the existing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) regime.

The Environment Act 2021 contains a framework for new and enhanced EPR, to be introduced in 2024. This follows a 12-month delay from the initial proposed introduction date of 1 January 2023. EPR places more stringent responsibilities on producers, including:

  • mandatory labelling and annual packaging waste recycling targets for 2030,
  • producer responsibility for costs of household waste, and
  • incentives for use of recyclable packaging.

In addition, all empty packaging and packaged items that are handled and supplied through the UK market must now be recorded. The new framework will apply to all UK organisations with an annual turnover of £1 million or more, who handle and supply packaging in excess of 25 tonnes per calendar year to consumers and to businesses. Exclusions and exemptions will apply, including for charities.

Specific responsibilities under the framework will be introduced over the next two years. These may include:

  • registering with the UK Government,
  • paying a fee to the Environmental Regulator,
  • buying a PRN (Packaging Waste Recycling Note) or PERN (Packaging Waste Export Recycling Note) to confirm that waste has been recycled appropriately, and
  • reporting empty packaging and packaged goods data.

The new framework is undoubtedly a positive step towards achieving a more sustainable, circular economy. Producers will need to be aware of the changes to their obligations, and any deadlines they will now be required to meet.

Going forward, the new EPR rules will act in conjunction with further regulatory developments affecting manufacturers regarding plastic use and regulation, such as:

  • A recently announced ban on a range of polluting single-use plastics in England, set to take effect from October 2023.
  • A binding global treaty by the UN to end plastic pollution by 2040, labelled as ‘the important international multilateral environmental deal since the Paris climate accord’.

Our thinking

  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • Court Determined Global Licence Determinations (Interim and Final): Cross Border Complexities

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • After You Leave: Navigating Non-Competes and Non-Solicitation Under Swiss Law

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Emoji on trial: Can a thumbs-up waive a rent increase?

    Harriet Durn

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Benoît Pasquier comments in Law UK on Switzerland as a leading centre for sports disputes

    Benoît Pasquier

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write for FT Adviser on how the Serious Fraud Office's latest business plan measures up against its five-year strategy

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
  • Access to privileged company documents: shareholder rule abolished

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Limitation and unfair prejudice petitions: the legend of Zedra

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Data Centre Arbitration in the Middle East: Navigating Disputes Amid Security Challenges

    Gareth Mills

    Insights

    min read
  • Tamasin Perkins comments in Today's Family Lawyer on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

    min read
  • Liquidated Damages and Pre-Agreed Compensation under the New UAE Civil Code: Article 340

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • Hardship and Lump-Sum Price Adjustments under the New UAE Civil Code: Articles 224 and 829

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • Disputes Over Donuts: Dawn Raids – Preparation, Response and What to Expect

    Jonathan Huth

    Podcasts

  • Dewdney William Drew writes for Solicitor's Journal on similarity, reverse confusion, and trade mark risk

    Dewdney William Drew

    In the Press

    min read
  • Shona Alexander and Maddie Dunn contribute to Family Law Journal, examining how disputes and relationship breakdowns can impact family farms

    Shona Alexander

    In the Press

    min read
  • The Sky’s the Limit: Arbitrating Aviation Disputes

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

    min read
  • eprivateclient features an article by Matt Foster and Sarah Moore on untangling crypto assets in divorce

    Matt Foster

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top