• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

UK Government announces consultation on calculating holiday entitlement for part-year and irregular hours workers

min read

Following the recent Supreme Court judgment in Harpur Trust v Brazelthe Government has initiated a consultation on the calculation of holiday entitlement for part-year and irregular hours workers.

In Harpur Trust v Brazel, the Supreme Court held that the correct interpretation of the Working Time Regulations 1998 (WTR) is that holiday entitlement for part-year workers should not be pro-rated so that it is proportionate to the amount of work actually performed each year. Instead, the Court held that part-year workers on permanent contracts should receive 5.6 weeks of annual leave and that their holiday entitlement should be calculated using a 52-week holiday entitlement reference period. The judgment noted that in calculating entitlement, the WTR adopts a “time-apportionment basis, not an apportionment on the basis of work actually done”, as reflected in the arrangements for apportioning entitlement for workers joining part way through a leave year.

As a consequence, part-year workers may receive a windfall - they are entitled to a larger annual paid holiday entitlement than part-time workers who work the same total number of hours across the year but work fewer hours each week consistently across the year. An illustration of how this disparity may occur in practice can be found here.

In an attempt to address this disparity, the consultation proposes introducing a 52-week holiday entitlement reference period for part-year workers and workers with irregular hours, based on the proportion of time spent working over the previous 52-week period. This would bring the holiday pay and entitlement of part-year workers in line with the entitlements received by full-time workers and part-time workers who work the same number of hours across the year.

The consultation opened on 12 January and will close on 9 March 2023. Further details on the consultation, and details of how to respond, are available here.

We are consulting on the calculation of holiday entitlement received by part-year and irregular hours workers, following the recent Supreme Court judgment in Harpur Trust v Brazel.

Our thinking

  • After You Leave: Navigating Non-Competes and Non-Solicitation Under Swiss Law

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • ITV News interviews Ben Smith about a parliamentary debate around statutory menstrual leave

    Ben Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Chiara Muston comments in People Management on 'empty time' and the gig economy

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens its position in the latest Legal 500 EMEA directory, with 22 firm rankings

    News

    min read
  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • UAE Guidance to Employers

    Michael Powner

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Clarity on Practice Direction No.1 of 2025 in employment law proceedings

    Nick Hurley

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Food & Beverage Lookahead 2026

    Olivia Gray

    Insights

    min read
  • The Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act 2023 – practical impact since implementation

    Chiara Muston

    Insights

    min read
  • Retail and Consumer Lookahead 2026

    Rachel Bell

    Insights

    min read
  • Day-one sick pay: costs, opportunities and practical steps for Retail and Food & Beverage businesses

    Chiara Muston

    Insights

    min read
  • What to Expect in Employment Law in 2026

    Nick Hurley

    Insights

    min read
  • The Daily Telegraph quotes Nick Hurley on Labour’s plans to ban ‘non-compete’ agreements in the UK

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

    min read
  • The Daily Telegraph quotes Nick Hurley on the impact of incoming reforms to the Employment Rights Act on businesses of all sizes

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

    min read
  • Why the new Border Act puts every workplace and beyond on the menu

    Emily McPartland

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Times, City AM and the Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on government plans to remove the cap on unfair dismissal claims

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

    min read
  • The Guardian and The i quote Emily Chalkley on the UK government's U-turn on day one employment rights

    Emily Chalkley

    In the Press

    min read
  • AI and Employment Law: Fairness, Transparency and Workplace Risk

    Emily Chalkley

    Insights

    min read
  • Swiss Employment Law: Your Essential Guide to Contracts, Rights, and Regulations

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • City AM quotes Dan Pollard on a number of amendments to the Employment Rights Bill being rejected by the House of Lords

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top