• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Brand owners now required to police influencers

Over the past few years, influencers have come under fire on consumer protection issues relating to the brands they endorse through social media channels.

However, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is now pointing the finger at brand owners to ensure they are actively ‘policing’ influencer endorsements and advertisements. A report by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) stated that 65% of the advertisements it had been monitoring over the period of a month, were not disclosed as ‘paid for’ content. To counter this, the CMA, ASA and The Office of Communications (Ofcom) have joined forces to challenge so-called “hidden advertising”, with the CMA issuing updated guidance for social media platforms, influencers and brands in November 2022.

Whilst the guidance outlines six core principles for social media platforms to implement in order to comply with consumer protection regulation (namely the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008), consumer brand businesses and owners now find themselves under an obligation to police the labelling of any paid-for promotional content as advertising.

The November guidance has sharpened the focus on the responsibility of brand owners to ensure that they are actively monitoring influencer posts relating to their brands, updating policies, and responding to customer concerns. If a business identifies content that is incorrectly labelled, this should not be ignored. Instead, brands are expected to work with influencers and any third parties (such as an intermediary marketing consultant) to ensure the content is correctly labelled using tags such as “#ad” or “ad”.

In practice, this means brands must now update their policies to comply with this regulatory framework. Brands will need to make sure their contracts with influencers are clear about the rules set out by the ASA in their CAP Code, which include proactively disclosing the fact that content posted for that brand is an advertisement. The CMA is looking at brand owners to take much more responsibility for a market that they have essentially created. Therefore, even in circumstances where a brand owner does not have editorial control of the posts relating to their brand or even a formal agreement in place, they will still have a responsibility to ensure consumers are adequately protected.

This is all part of the CMA’s drive to increase enforcement relating to consumer protection and whilst a failure to get this right could cause reputational damage for brands, extensive fines are on the horizon. There were hints in the most recent Autumn Budget that 2023 will bring reforms in the area of competition and consumer law regimes, granting the CMA new direct enforcement powers against consumer protection breaches. And with such powers comes sizeable fines. Consumer protection is clearly an absolute priority for both the CMA and the government for 2023 and brand owners will need to stay alert to the fact that they too need to remain accountable and responsible to avoid these impending penalties.

Any paid for endorsements or gifts that aren’t clearly labelled as an ‘Ad’ may be in breach of consumer protection law or break industry rules on advertising

Our thinking

  • Through the Looking-Glass: Is the Government's Vision for Farming Coming into Focus?

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • The Murdochs and the Buffetts – succession planning for billionaires

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • LCIA's 2024 Casework Report – Still Going Strong

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Serious failings by Trustee amount to a breach of trust: Charles Russell Speechlys advises the Hon. Mrs Dawson-Damer in appeal of long-running trust dispute

    Ziva Robertson

    News

  • Delay of the new food and drink ads regulation & impact on live sports broadcasts

    Sarah Johnson

    Insights

  • Understanding the Data (Use and Access) Act 2025: Implications for UK Businesses

    Janine Regan

    Insights

  • Maddie Dunn writes for Farmers Guardian on last month’s Spending Review and the Government’s attitude to farming

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

  • ICC Arbitration Statistics 2024 – UAE Breaks into Top 5 Seats

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Why Getty Images v Stability AI Judgment Will Not Answer Our Key Questions

    Nick White

    Insights

  • How does extradition work?

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Extradition in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Food Security is National Security: can regenerative agriculture help fortify the UK?

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • To share or not to share, that is the question. The Supreme Court hands down judgment in ‘big money’ divorce case Standish v Standish and clarifies the position regarding matrimonialisation and the sharing principle

    Miranda Fisher

    Insights

  • Joseph Evans, Ethan Khurwolah and Simon Heatley write for Thomson Reuters Practical Law on litigation funding and PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • CDR Magazine quotes Simon Le Wita on the Keystone XL pipeline ICSID arbitration

    Simon Le Wita

    In the Press

  • Courts are not couples’ therapists - and that’s a good thing

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • Hague Judgments Convention 2019: Easing cross-border recognition and enforcement of judgments between all UK nations, the EU & beyond from 1 July 2025

    Molly Tatchell

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes highly regarded regulatory and investigations litigator Richard Burger in London

    Richard Burger

    News

  • Liz Gifford, Janine Regan and Courtney Benard write for New Law Journal on an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill which will allow UK charities to send direct marketing emails to supporters without prior opt-in consent

    Liz Gifford

    In the Press

  • Tuition Tussle: Unveiling the VAT Verdict in the Private School Fees Showdown in the case of "ALR and others v Chancellor of the Exchequer Case"

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

Back to top