• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

UAE Ministry of Justice Supports Reciprocal Enforcement of English Judgments

On 13 September 2022 the UAE Ministry of Justice issued a letter informing the Dubai Courts that the English Courts had recognised a UAE judgment, and as such the requirement for reciprocity when considering whether or not to enforce an English judgment had been met. This is a significant development which is expected to make enforcement of English judgments more straightforward in the UAE, although it remains the case that enforcement is not automatic.

Previously, when seeking to enforce an English judgment a judgment creditor had, to satisfy the UAE Courts, amongst other things, that the English Courts would enforce a UAE judgment, which led to a high risk of inconsistency case to case. Whilst not strictly binding on the UAE Courts, the Ministry of Justice’s letter seems to have resolved this issue, at least in part, as it notes that the UAE Courts should recognise that reciprocity does now exist between the two jurisdictions' courts, when it comes to enforcing each other’s judgments. 

The English judgment referred to in the Ministry of Justice's letter is Lenkor Energy Trading DMCC v Puri [2021] EWCA Civ 770, which concerned the enforcement of a UAE judgment (arising out of a claim related to a dishonoured cheque) in England. The English Court of Appeal found that the Dubai Court of Cassation judgment was to be recognised and enforced in England because the UAE Court had jurisdiction over the dispute, the judgment was final, and it did not offend English public policy. 

Whilst it is anticipated that the Ministry of Justice’s confirmation of reciprocity will streamline the process of enforcement of English judgments in the UAE overall, other criteria for recognition and enforcement still need to be satisfied under the general rules for enforcement of foreign judgments. These criteria are contained in the UAE Civil Procedures Law (Federal Law No.11/1992) and Cabinet Decision No. 57/2018, and are that:

  1. The UAE Courts do not have exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute.
  2. The foreign court had jurisdiction in accordance with its own rules and properly issued judgment under those rules. 
  3. The defendant was summoned and represented before the foreign court.
  4. The judgment is final (i.e. it has res judicata effect). 
  5. The judgment does not conflict with a UAE judgment or order, nor is it contrary to UAE public morals. 

The Ministry of Justice’s letter is nonetheless a welcome development. It is anticipated that it will give greater confidence to those seeking to enforce English judgments in the UAE, and demonstrates the commitment of the UAE Courts to maintaining a good judicial relationship with the English Courts, to the mutual benefit of both countries.

If you have any questions please contact Sara Sheffield (Partner) sara.sheffield@crsblaw.com. 

The International Cooperation Department of the Ministry of Justice requests courts in the country to take all the legal steps required to acknowledge and enforce orders by English courts.

Our thinking

  • Habits to Prevent Burnout in Law

    Rebecca Piper

    Events

  • Agricultural law review 2025/2026: Key cases and legislation in 2025 and what’s ahead in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Key Developments in International Arbitration for 2026

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Agricultural policy review 2025: Key changes and what to expect in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Compliance Week quotes Abigail Rushton on the UK’s anti-corruption strategy and compliance lessons for companies and advisors

    Abigail Rushton

    In the Press

  • When Saying “No” to Mediation Is Reasonable: Guidance from Grijns v Grijns

    Bella Preece

    Quick Reads

  • A farm legal resilience checklist: 10-Minute audit to protect your business in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Internet Retailing quotes Jamie Cartwright on the HFSS advertising ban

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • Law 360 quotes Caroline Greenwell and Bella Henry on the Santander APP fraud case

    Caroline Greenwell

    In the Press

  • Non-EU Courts on the Enforcement of Spain’s Intra-EU Arbitration Awards: Sovereign Immunity and EU Law Objections

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • New Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF) implemented - how might it affect you?

    Vadim Romanoff

    Quick Reads

  • Cobden v Cobden: the Court of Appeal revisits exceptional circumstances and “proprietary estoppel-ish” equity on dissolution of a farming partnership

    Cora Hardy

    Insights

  • Defamation Defences in Practice: Key Takeaways from the case of Noel Clarke v The Guardian

    Ellen Roberts

    Insights

  • Are Dasher, Dancer and Prancer and friends livestock? Can Father Christmas and his reindeer clear UK animal movement rules in a single night?

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • From tweet to trial: Blake v Fox

    Hannah Gornall

    Insights

  • Merry Christmas to farmers and business owners - a surprise (and very welcome) increase to the 100% APR/BPR allowance

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Thomas R. Snider, Ahmad Anani and Etidal Alwazani write for Daily Jus on the architecture of interim measures under the Qatari Civil and Commercial Arbitration Law

    Thomas R. Snider

    In the Press

  • The Farming Profitability Review and the new Farming and Food Partnership Board: what’s new and what do you need to know?

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • The Lawyer quotes Joseph Evans on the UK government’s plans to introduce legislation to reverse PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • The Architecture of Interim Measures under the Qatari Civil and Commercial Arbitration Law

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

Back to top