• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The Office of Tax Simplification will be shut down

min read

The Chancellor, Kwasi Kwarteng announced on Friday as part of the Government’s mini-budget that the Office of Tax Simplification (the OTS) will be shut down.

The Chancellor said “for the tax system to favour growth Mr Speaker, it needs to be much simpler. I am hugely grateful to the OTS for everything they have achieved since 2010 but instead of a single arm’s length body which is separate from the Treasury and HMRC we need to embed tax simplification into the heart of Government. That is why Mr Speaker I have decided to wind down the OTS…”

Instead, he plans to mandate every one of his tax officials to focus on simplifying the tax code. This is in a bid by the Government to make the tax system more dynamic and fairer to families.

The OTS was set up in 2010 to identify areas where complexities in the tax system for businesses and individual taxpayers can be reduced. The body is an independent office of HM Treasury.

Previously, the OTS urged the Government to overhaul capital gains tax and as a result the Government did accept some of the technical and administrative recommendations made by the OTS. The OTS has also previously outlined recommendations for simplifying the technical design of IHT, but the Government decided not to proceed with those changes.

This announcement was a surprise to most as only in November 2021 did HM Treasury publish its first five-yearly review of the OTS concluding that the need for the OTS remained undiminished.

It will be interesting to see if tax officials have the time and resources to focus on simplifying the tax code on top of their day jobs and whether we will see any simplification brought to the capital gains tax and inheritance tax frameworks in the future.

"According to its most recent annual report, the OTS had an average full-time-equivalent headcount of fewer than 10 during the last financial year. Its budget for the year was £1,057,000, of which staff costs accounted for £868,000."

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Child Maintenance: Reform, a Key Appeal, and the Elusive Christmas Order

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • High Court interprets repair covenant in Hotel lease and statutory fire safety obligations

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

    min read
  • PISCES Platforms Update: Wayve Marks a Milestone as a Fourth Operator Enters the Sandbox

    Greg Stonefield

    Insights

    min read
  • Building safety update: Progress on future changes, including the recategorisation of certain higher risk building works

    David Savage

    Insights

    min read
  • Giorgia Ligasacchi writes in We Wealth about collectors, Matthew Wong's artworks, and the contemporary art scene

    Giorgia Ligasacchi

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys Opens New York Office and Connecticut Practice

    Simon Ridpath

    News

    min read
  • US Citizens moving to the UK part 8: Key considerations in relation to child arrangements

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Why domicile still matters after the 2025 IHT changes

    Harriet Betteridge

    Insights

    min read
  • Retirement without a pension?

    Matt Foster

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 7: Will my US prenuptial agreement be binding in England and Wales?

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • China's New Outbound Investment Regulation: Key Changes and What They Mean for Investors

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

    min read
  • Nicola Saccardo speaks to TopLegal on the growth of Charles Russell Speechlys’ Italian practice

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Richard Davies and Katy Hudson write in City AM on sponsorship activations during the World Cup

    Richard Davies

    In the Press

    min read
  • Recalibrating England’s rental market: The Renters’ Rights Act

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

    min read
  • Estates Gazette Q&A: Redevelopment break clauses

    Matt Cordwent

    Insights

    min read
  • Mulalley v Sto: Germany cladding product supplier found 87.5% responsible in contribution claim

    Rebecca Morjaria

    Insights

    min read
  • Sarah Jane Boon answers a Financial Times reader's question on the legal implications of a destination wedding

    Sarah Jane Boon

    In the Press

    min read
  • Questions on rights of light

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

    min read
  • Solving renters’ rights conundrums

    Laura Bushaway

    Insights

    min read
Back to top