• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Saudi Arabian Ministry of Justice and Leading Arbitration Center Confirm Party Autonomy in Arbitral Representation

The Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration (the “SCCA”) has confirmed that Saudi law protects the freedom of parties to choose any representative they wish to represent them before arbitral tribunals in the Kingdom, and that using a foreign lawyer was not a ground for annulling an arbitral award.

A comprehensive review of Saudi legislation was carried out by the SCCA with the Ministry of Justice (“MoJ”), with particular attention paid to the Saudi arbitration and enforcement laws.

The SCCA said the legislative and judicial authorities’ shared the same stance of protecting parties’ freedom to choose their legal representative in arbitration, which was aligned with international best practice in the industry and supported the country’s efforts to develop a culture of arbitration, not least as part of the Vision 2030 national economic development strategy.

What does this mean for parties in dispute in Saudi Arabia?

The SCCA/MoJ announcement provides clarity and certainty to foreign parties in particular, who may wish to use their own counsel from outside the Kingdom but had concerns that this could leave the award vulnerable to challenge.

As the SCCA notes, this freedom to instruct counsel is in line with international best practice. This includes the grounds for annulment in the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (better known as the New York Convention), neither of which allow for annulment due to use of non-local representatives.

On a broader level, it further underscores the strides that Saudi has taken in recent years to modernise its arbitration framework and business environment generally to appeal to the international community and ensure that investors can have confidence when doing business in Saudi.

It also demonstrates an active approach by SCCA/MoJ to recognise and address the concerns of arbitration users, which bodes well for the future.

If you have any questions about dispute resolution in Saudi Arabia, please contact Patrick Gearon, Peter Smith or another member of the Commercial Dispute Resolution team.

SCCA’s study stated that party representation by non-Saudis and non-lawyers in arbitration proceedings is not one of the grounds for annulment specified in Article 50 of the Arbitration Law; thereby putting to rest the hesitation of allowing foreign legal counsel to represent parties in Saudi-seated arbitrations.

Our thinking

  • QFC Structures for Family Business Succession and Governance

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

  • Compliance Week quotes Abigail Rushton on the UK’s anti-corruption strategy and compliance lessons for companies and advisors

    Abigail Rushton

    In the Press

  • When Saying “No” to Mediation Is Reasonable: Guidance from Grijns v Grijns

    Bella Preece

    Quick Reads

  • A farm legal resilience checklist: 10-Minute audit to protect your business in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Internet Retailing quotes Jamie Cartwright on the HFSS advertising ban

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Harriet Betteridge, Hannah Catt, Gregoire Uldry and Alex Reid on 2026 predictions in the private wealth space

    Harriet Betteridge

    In the Press

  • Law 360 quotes Caroline Greenwell and Bella Henry on the Santander APP fraud case

    Caroline Greenwell

    In the Press

  • Non-EU Courts on the Enforcement of Spain’s Intra-EU Arbitration Awards: Sovereign Immunity and EU Law Objections

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • New Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF) implemented - how might it affect you?

    Vadim Romanoff

    Quick Reads

  • Cobden v Cobden: the Court of Appeal revisits exceptional circumstances and “proprietary estoppel-ish” equity on dissolution of a farming partnership

    Cora Hardy

    Insights

  • Defamation Defences in Practice: Key Takeaways from the case of Noel Clarke v The Guardian

    Ellen Roberts

    Insights

  • Are Dasher, Dancer and Prancer and friends livestock? Can Father Christmas and his reindeer clear UK animal movement rules in a single night?

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • From tweet to trial: Blake v Fox

    Hannah Gornall

    Insights

  • Merry Christmas to farmers and business owners - a surprise (and very welcome) increase to the 100% APR/BPR allowance

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Thomas R. Snider, Ahmad Anani and Etidal Alwazani write for Daily Jus on the architecture of interim measures under the Qatari Civil and Commercial Arbitration Law

    Thomas R. Snider

    In the Press

  • The Farming Profitability Review and the new Farming and Food Partnership Board: what’s new and what do you need to know?

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • The Lawyer quotes Joseph Evans on the UK government’s plans to introduce legislation to reverse PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • The Architecture of Interim Measures under the Qatari Civil and Commercial Arbitration Law

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

  • Peace on Earth (or at least the Estate): Managing Family Farming Business Disputes Effectively

    Karin Mouhon

    Insights

  • What Changes in Switzerland on 1 Jan 2026: Debt Registers, Defects, Credit, and Remote Testimony

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

Back to top