• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Saudi Arabian Ministry of Justice and Leading Arbitration Center Confirm Party Autonomy in Arbitral Representation

The Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration (the “SCCA”) has confirmed that Saudi law protects the freedom of parties to choose any representative they wish to represent them before arbitral tribunals in the Kingdom, and that using a foreign lawyer was not a ground for annulling an arbitral award.

A comprehensive review of Saudi legislation was carried out by the SCCA with the Ministry of Justice (“MoJ”), with particular attention paid to the Saudi arbitration and enforcement laws.

The SCCA said the legislative and judicial authorities’ shared the same stance of protecting parties’ freedom to choose their legal representative in arbitration, which was aligned with international best practice in the industry and supported the country’s efforts to develop a culture of arbitration, not least as part of the Vision 2030 national economic development strategy.

What does this mean for parties in dispute in Saudi Arabia?

The SCCA/MoJ announcement provides clarity and certainty to foreign parties in particular, who may wish to use their own counsel from outside the Kingdom but had concerns that this could leave the award vulnerable to challenge.

As the SCCA notes, this freedom to instruct counsel is in line with international best practice. This includes the grounds for annulment in the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (better known as the New York Convention), neither of which allow for annulment due to use of non-local representatives.

On a broader level, it further underscores the strides that Saudi has taken in recent years to modernise its arbitration framework and business environment generally to appeal to the international community and ensure that investors can have confidence when doing business in Saudi.

It also demonstrates an active approach by SCCA/MoJ to recognise and address the concerns of arbitration users, which bodes well for the future.

If you have any questions about dispute resolution in Saudi Arabia, please contact Patrick Gearon, Peter Smith or another member of the Commercial Dispute Resolution team.

SCCA’s study stated that party representation by non-Saudis and non-lawyers in arbitration proceedings is not one of the grounds for annulment specified in Article 50 of the Arbitration Law; thereby putting to rest the hesitation of allowing foreign legal counsel to represent parties in Saudi-seated arbitrations.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2025

    Simon Ridpath

    Events

  • Scoring Big: The dynamics of Investment in Sport

    Molly Moseley

    Quick Reads

  • Within or out of scope: third party communications and without prejudice privilege

    Simon Heatley

    Insights

  • Through the Looking-Glass: Is the Government's Vision for Farming Coming into Focus?

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • The Murdochs and the Buffetts – succession planning for billionaires

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • LCIA's 2024 Casework Report – Still Going Strong

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Serious failings by Trustee amount to a breach of trust: Charles Russell Speechlys advises the Hon. Mrs Dawson-Damer in appeal of long-running trust dispute

    Ziva Robertson

    News

  • Maddie Dunn writes for Farmers Guardian on last month’s Spending Review and the Government’s attitude to farming

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

  • ICC Arbitration Statistics 2024 – UAE Breaks into Top 5 Seats

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Why Getty Images v Stability AI Judgment Will Not Answer Our Key Questions

    Nick White

    Insights

  • How does extradition work?

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Extradition in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Food Security is National Security: can regenerative agriculture help fortify the UK?

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Keeping compliant: Navigating SFO regulations globally

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

  • Navigating Conditions Precedent: a comparative analysis of Contractual Practices in the Middle East and England & Wales

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

  • To share or not to share, that is the question. The Supreme Court hands down judgment in ‘big money’ divorce case Standish v Standish and clarifies the position regarding matrimonialisation and the sharing principle

    Miranda Fisher

    Insights

  • Joseph Evans, Ethan Khurwolah and Simon Heatley write for Thomson Reuters Practical Law on litigation funding and PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • CDR Magazine quotes Simon Le Wita on the Keystone XL pipeline ICSID arbitration

    Simon Le Wita

    In the Press

  • Courts are not couples’ therapists - and that’s a good thing

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • Hague Judgments Convention 2019: Easing cross-border recognition and enforcement of judgments between all UK nations, the EU & beyond from 1 July 2025

    Molly Tatchell

    Quick Reads

Back to top