• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Saudi Arabian Ministry of Justice and Leading Arbitration Center Confirm Party Autonomy in Arbitral Representation

min read

The Saudi Center for Commercial Arbitration (the “SCCA”) has confirmed that Saudi law protects the freedom of parties to choose any representative they wish to represent them before arbitral tribunals in the Kingdom, and that using a foreign lawyer was not a ground for annulling an arbitral award.

A comprehensive review of Saudi legislation was carried out by the SCCA with the Ministry of Justice (“MoJ”), with particular attention paid to the Saudi arbitration and enforcement laws.

The SCCA said the legislative and judicial authorities’ shared the same stance of protecting parties’ freedom to choose their legal representative in arbitration, which was aligned with international best practice in the industry and supported the country’s efforts to develop a culture of arbitration, not least as part of the Vision 2030 national economic development strategy.

What does this mean for parties in dispute in Saudi Arabia?

The SCCA/MoJ announcement provides clarity and certainty to foreign parties in particular, who may wish to use their own counsel from outside the Kingdom but had concerns that this could leave the award vulnerable to challenge.

As the SCCA notes, this freedom to instruct counsel is in line with international best practice. This includes the grounds for annulment in the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Award (better known as the New York Convention), neither of which allow for annulment due to use of non-local representatives.

On a broader level, it further underscores the strides that Saudi has taken in recent years to modernise its arbitration framework and business environment generally to appeal to the international community and ensure that investors can have confidence when doing business in Saudi.

It also demonstrates an active approach by SCCA/MoJ to recognise and address the concerns of arbitration users, which bodes well for the future.

If you have any questions about dispute resolution in Saudi Arabia, please contact Patrick Gearon, Peter Smith or another member of the Commercial Dispute Resolution team.

SCCA’s study stated that party representation by non-Saudis and non-lawyers in arbitration proceedings is not one of the grounds for annulment specified in Article 50 of the Arbitration Law; thereby putting to rest the hesitation of allowing foreign legal counsel to represent parties in Saudi-seated arbitrations.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • The UAE's New Civil Code: Implications for Construction Contracts

    Maher Al Nashar

    Events

    min read
  • Claudine Morgan, Hannah Gornall and Ellen Roberts write in New Law Journal about the implications of a landmark anti-SLAPP judgment

    Claudine Morgan

    In the Press

    min read
  • India-UAE BIT 2024: What to Expect When You’re Investing

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Affidavits in International Litigation - Lessons for Trust Companies from a Recent Geneva Judgment

    Bruno Ledrappier

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Increased Expedited Procedure Threshold under the 2026 ICC Rules: What Does It Mean for Mid-Value Construction Disputes in the UAE?

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • Case No. 9. Can an arbitration clause be extended to a non-signatory party, and what are the relevant factors?

    Annapaola Negri-Clementi

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, as Liquidator of Awal Bank BSC(c) (In Liquidation), welcomes Bahraini Court judgment upholding liquidator’s rejection of US$2.8 billion of claims and confirming debts owing to Awal Bank of US$2.56 billion

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • New Corporate Liability for criminal offences committed by Senior Managers: Section 250 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026

    Rachel Warren

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Forum Wars or Forum Steering? Global licence determinations, cross border complexities, ADR and the next stage of FRAND Disputes

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • New 2026 ICC Rules of Arbitration: what’s changed and what it means

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • The Dubai Conflicts of Jurisdiction Tribunal Continues to Define the Boundaries of DIFC and Onshore Dubai Court Jurisdiction in Arbitral Award Recognition and Enforcement

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Disputes Over Donuts: Spotlight on the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026

    Thomas R. Snider

    Podcasts

  • The New UAE Civil Code: A Series Overview

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys moves offices in Milan following consistent growth of Italian practice

    Michael Lingens

    News

    min read
  • A New Chapter for UAE Competition Law: Inside Cabinet Decision No. 59 of 2026

    Mo Nawash

    Insights

    min read
Back to top