• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Building Safety Fund has re-opened for applications

min read

The Building Safety Fund (“the BSF”) was first announced in March 2020 by the then Chancellor, Rishi Sunak, to assist with funding the cost of removing and replacing unsafe non-ACM cladding on high-rise residential buildings. At that time, monies had already been made available to cover the cost of remediating high-rise buildings installed with ACM cladding, deemed to pose the greatest risk.

The Government has now reopened the BSF for new applications together with issuing guidance for those applications. This contains detailed eligibility criteria for making an application. Broadly, private and social sector buildings containing a least one qualifying residential leaseholder which are 18 metres or above and have cladding where fire risks have been identified fall within scope. There are particular technical criteria that a building must have a Fire Risk Appraisal of External Wall construction following the British Standards Institute methodology in PAS 9980:2022.

Landlords and leaseholders will no doubt be considering making new applications where a building is eligible and no application has previously been made. Landlords will in the future have specific duties under the Building Safety Act (“the BSA”) to consider whether any grants are payable in respect of remediation works so will want to consider the application guidance, in appropriate situations.

The BSA will make changes to landlord and tenant legislation to require landlords carrying out certain remediation works (to be defined in Regulations) to do the following:

  1. Take reasonable steps to ascertain whether any grant is payable in respect of the remediation works and if so, to obtain the grant;
  2. Take reasonable steps to consider whether any contribution to remediation works is due from a third party and if so, obtain the monies from the third party; and
  3. Take prescribed steps relating to any other prescribed kind of funding. Further details of what falls within scope will be contained in secondary legislation (not yet available).

Those steps can be taken before or after remediation works are carried out. However, if they are not taken, a leaseholder can make an application for an order that all or part of remediation costs incurred by a landlord are not reasonable and not payable by a leaseholder through a service charge.

These requirements are not yet in force but landlords will, no doubt, be considering their duties and responsibilities under the BSA and seeking professional advice. It will therefore be important for landlords of certain buildings to take note of the reopening of the BSF and familiarise themselves with the application guidance. The closure date for new applications has not been announced but the Government has stated that the date will be published with “reasonable notice”. We are monitoring developments on our Building and Fire Safety Hub.

Please do not hesitate to contact Richard Flenley, Laura Bushaway or your usual Charles Russell Speechlys contact if you have any queries.

Our thinking

  • Lauren Fraser comments in New Law Journal on a Supreme Court decision regarding Right to Manage claims

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • Property Patter: Service Charges – What is the current state of play?

    Georgina Muskett

    Podcasts

  • Niamh Tenison contributes to an Estates Gazette legal Q&A on limitation periods and incorrect court fees

    Niamh Tenison

    In the Press

    min read
  • Qatar’s New Preliminary Registration Framework: A Transformative Step for the Off-Plan Market

    Ahmad Anani

    Insights

    min read
  • Summer 2026 Update: Where are we are on the Government’s roadmap to Commonhold?

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024: New consultations on valuation and legal costs of enfranchisement and lease extension claims

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Leasehold Reform; Government responds to consultation on service charge regulation

    Laura Bushaway

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • No Trivial Matter: What Todd v Marsh Tells Us About Informal Boundary Agreements

    Bella Preece

    Insights

    min read
  • Upper Tribunal finds that a Wholesale Infrastructure Provider did not hold Code rights

    Joshua Hardy

    Insights

    min read
  • Competing Land Uses and the Relationship Between Nuisance and Negligence: Key Lessons from Thomas v Nicholas [2026] EWCA Civ 847

    Laura Bushaway

    Insights

    min read
  • Application for modification of a restrictive covenant where the land had been gifted in a will for a specific use

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

    min read
  • Andrew Ross contributes to a legal Q&A in Estates Gazette on nuisance claims

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs, Conduct & Counter-Offers – Key Takeaways from the Bankside rights of light costs decision

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

    min read
  • High Court interprets repair covenant in Hotel lease and statutory fire safety obligations

    Chandni Pandya

    Insights

    min read
  • Building safety update: Progress on future changes, including the recategorisation of certain higher risk building works

    David Savage

    Insights

    min read
  • Georgina Muskett contributes to PropLaw on the Landlord and Tenant Act and opposing lease renewal on the ground of redevelopment

    Georgina Muskett

    In the Press

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in PropLaw on reforms to property ownership in the UK through commonhold tenure

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • Estates Gazette Q&A: Redevelopment break clauses

    Matt Cordwent

    Insights

    min read
  • Questions on rights of light

    Georgina Muskett

    Insights

    min read
  • Solving renters’ rights conundrums

    Laura Bushaway

    Insights

    min read
Back to top