• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Top Gun: Maverick studio Paramount sued over alleged copyright breach

Paramount Pictures has been drawn into a potentially huge legal battle over the rights to Top Gun. The family of the Israeli writer whose article inspired the 1986 Tom Cruise movie Top Gun is suing film studio Paramount Pictures for copyright infringement over its sequel, Top Gun: Maverick. According to a lawsuit filed on Monday in the California federal court, they claim Paramount did not have the rights to Ehud Yonay's 1983 story when it released the sequel Top Gun: Maverick last month, relying on a provision in US copyright law that allows authors to reclaim the rights to their works after waiting a period of time, normally 35 years. In other words, they are claiming that the rights to the story reverted back to them in January 2020 after sending Paramount a notice of termination. They are seeking an injunction to block the studio from further exploiting the Top Gun sequel.

So what on earth is this all about?

  • The case arises out of a claim that Paramount did not re-acquire (and of course pay for) the requisite film and ancillary rights to the Yonay copyrighted story prior to the completion and release of the sequel. A key part of the case will turn on whether the movie is actually a derivative based on the original copyright work. The original copyright work is a story written by Yonay in 1983 about a naval training base focused on the pilots and their experiences, referring to hotshot pilot “Yogi” and his radio officer “Possum.”
  • There will then be an assessment of what rights exactly Jerry Bruckheimer bought in 1983 when he produced the original movie. There may well be arguments that the purchase may not have been necessary to produce the first Top Gun movie.
  • Then whether Paramount actually would have needed to secure a new licence to the Yonay story, assuming that rights did in fact revert to the Yonays in 2020.
  • Paramount will no doubt deny that the new movie is a derivative of the original copyrighted 1983 story. In essence, Paramount may argue that the sequel’s story does not rely on the Yonay 1983 story for the original elements included in Top Gun: Maverick.
  • We also have to remember that this is on a particular provision of US copyright law so we have a way to go before we start drawing out conclusions for the international copyright and film community.

We are going to see a lot of different arguments for sure. Who will win through? Watch this space.

Our thinking

  • From Manchester to the Metaverse: How United’s Roblox Rollout Could Help Drive Fan Engagement

    Shennind Awat-Ranai

    Insights

  • Design Rights and Bright Lights: M&S wins appeal over Aldi's bottle design

    Mary Bagnall

    Insights

  • Is a Big Mac meat or chicken? Thoughts on the recent General Court decision

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Tortious liability: Supreme Court brings relief for directors

    Olivia Gray

    Insights

  • Using Generative AI and staying on the right side of the law

    Rebecca Steer

    Insights

  • World Trademark Review quotes Charlotte Duly on a recent Supreme Court director liability ruling

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Copyright in the Age of AI

    Mark Hill

    Quick Reads

  • CDR Magazine quotes Charlotte Duly on the inter partes process for trade mark opposition

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Qatar joins the Madrid Protocol

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Digital Deception: The Rise of Deepfakes

    Mark Hill

    Quick Reads

  • Nvidia faces class-action lawsuit for training AI model on ‘shadow library’

    Mark Hill

    Quick Reads

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on the importance of business branding

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • City AM quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s Clubcard rebrand after losing battle with Lidl

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • Combatting lookalikes in the light of Thatchers v Aldi

    Mary Bagnall

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys grows its rankings in The Legal 500 EMEA directory

    Frédéric Jeannin

    News

  • World Intellectual Property Review quotes Charlotte Duly on Tesco’s trademark row with Lidl over its Clubcard logo

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • A Modern Marriage: How AI Powered By Blockchain Could Protect IP Rights

    Shennind Awat-Ranai

    Insights

  • Property Patter – Filming Agreements Part 2

    Naomi Nettleton

    Podcasts

  • Rebranding: What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell just as sweet.

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • The ongoing fight against fakes

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

Back to top