• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

So, you (don't) think you're special?

min read

The English arm of VTB Bank - VTB Capital - is the latest in a line of Russian-linked financial institutions which have been forced into insolvency proceedings by the recent round of sanctions, its directors having applied to Court for an administration order.

Interestingly, though, VTB Capital has not gone down the route of seeking a special administration (as Sova Capital and Sberbank have recently done).  These special administrations are, broadly, used where systemically important banks or other financial institutions are insolvent and, particularly, where client money / investments need to be handled or returned.  

The reason that the directors sought a 'normal' administration order is somewhat unusual - VTB Capital was itself already in wind-down.  As a result of sanctions imposed in 2014, resulting from the annexation of Crimea, VTB Capital was in the process of shutting up shop.  As such, there was no ongoing trade or customers that needed to be protected by the special administration procedure.  VTB Capital was balance sheet solvent but the latest sanctions had caused its bank accounts to be frozen which had rendered it cash flow insolvent. 

Mr Justice Fancourt, when considering the application, was satisfied that an ordinary administration (as opposed to a special administration) was appropriate.  Particularly because the relevant regulators had been consulted and had not raised concerns.  Fancourt J was also satisfied that an administration order should be made in the circumstances but did not make such an order then and there; VTB Capital already had a licence from the UK sanctions authority - the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation - but did not yet have one from its US equivalent, the Office of Foreign Assets Control ("OFAC").  Without an OFAC licence, the administrators would not be able to take the relevant steps needed to manage the estate and, therefore, Fancourt J said that he was minded to appoint the administrators but would leave the order unsealed until the OFAC licence had been obtained.  This is an interesting approach by the Court, and one which clearly seeks to achieve the best outcome possible in the circumstances and to provide certainty. 

It remains to be seen, as the economic effect of sanctions trickles down, whether further Russian-linked entities will find themselves at the doors of the Rolls Building seeking similar orders.

...unlike London-headquartered Sova Capital and Sberbank CIB (UK), which both entered special administration, VTB Capital has sought to be placed into an ordinary administration.

Bayfield told the court that it had discussed the application with UK regulators – the Bank of England, the Prudential Regulation Authority, the Financial Conduct Authority and the Financial Services Compensation Scheme – and none had raised objections.

He said the regulators did not ask for VTB to be put in special administration, partly as a result of its existing winding down process.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Arbitration of Trust Disputes Webinar

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Fowl Play: Lessons from Lux Films Ltd v Fowler & Anor [2026] EWHC 963 (KB)

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Genuine Belief Is Not Enough: Supreme Court Confirms Section 172 Demands Good Faith in Conduct, Not Just Thought

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge, and Lyla Gilbert write in Packaging Europe about landmark reforms on packaging sustainability regulations in the UK and Europe

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath discusses Charles Russell Speechlys' strategic US expansion with Legal Business

    In the Press

    min read
  • Maddie Dunn writes in The Grocer on the UK government’s recently published Farming Roadmap

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

    min read
  • Criminal Lawyers Switzerland 2026: Corporate Criminal Liability, AML Risks & Enforcement

    Bruno Ledrappier

    Insights

    min read
  • Switzerland's New Stalking Offence (article 181b SCC): What Businesses, In‑house Counsel and Executives Must Know

    Bruno Ledrappier

    Insights

    min read
  • A Roadmap at last – but does it go far enough?

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • How to Respond to a Dawn Raid in Switzerland: Immediate Steps, Sealing (CPC), Privilege & Electronic Data

    Bruno Ledrappier

    Insights

    min read
  • Data Manipulation, Millions in Fines, and a New Corporate Offence: What Southern Water Tells Us

    Rachel Warren

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Tamasin Perkins writes in IFA Magazine about the limits of “challenge-proof” wills

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

    min read
  • Caroline Greenwell comments in Global Investigations Review on Jonathan Fisher KC's report, Fraud in the Digital Age, and its recommendations for tackling fraud in the UK

    Caroline Greenwell

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jersey Trade Mark Reform: What the New Regime Means for You

    Dewdney William Drew

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Fraudsters in the Inbox: The Limits of Contractual Causation in Logix Aero v Siam Aero

    Natalya Stone

    Insights

    min read
Back to top