• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

LPAs – a welcome change for the better

In a statement which will be welcomed by anyone who acts for private clients, be it solicitors or their financial advisors, the Law Society has reported that the Office of the Public Guardian has confirmed that there is now no longer a requirement for the express provision in Lasting Powers of Attorney (LPAs) to be included in relation to the discretionary management of investments.  This is the long-awaited confirmation and clarity that attorneys and their advisors have been waiting for and is a welcome step in removing further expenses and bureaucracy during an already challenging time.

The revised guidance continues to shine a light on the importance of reviewing any wills, letters of wishes and LPAs (for Property and Financial Affairs, and Health and Welfare) as there may be recent legislative or personal changes that need to be considered in order to accurately reflect an individual’s wishes.

LPAs have been in the spotlight over the last couple of years. The heart-breaking ITV documentary ‘Finding Derek’ that saw presenter Kate Garraway reflect on the practical difficulties in obtaining the necessary financial access due to not having an LPA in place for her husband, Derek Draper. The Coronavirus pandemic has generated greater awareness of the importance of having LPAs in the event of unforeseen personal changes.

An LPA for Property and Financial Affairs is a valuable legal document which allows an individual, the donor, to appoint one or more attorneys to act on their behalf in relation to their financial affairs in the event of a lack of capacity (or before this with the consent of the donor). Such decisions include, but are by no means limited to, paying bills, selling property or investments and operating bank accounts. 

Following guidance issued by the Office of the Public Guardian in 2015, it was advised that provision expressly authorising the use of discretionary investment management be included in the LPA. Without this, the donor's investment manager was not permitted to continue to run a portfolio on a “discretionary” basis, often resulting in the attorney being responsible for investment decisions which they did not have the necessary expertise to make. Attorneys were therefore potentially faced with having to make an application to the Court of Protection for this permission which could be lengthy, time consuming and expensive. 

The prior guidance left LPAs drafted prior to 2015, along with any created since then by donors unaware of this requirement, without this provision.  This week's announcement is therefore a welcome change for the better, providing certainty for the donor and their attorney, as well as for the investment managers who manage funds on their behalf. It is also a timely reminder of the importance of a regular review of wills and LPAs to ensure they still meet the needs of the individual.

Law Society president I. Stephanie Boyce said: “I am delighted the OPG has decided to amend its guidance on how attorneys can invest on behalf of those for whom they’re appointed.”

“It’s in everyone’s interests to avoid the cost of an unnecessary court application.”

Our thinking

  • When the Jellicle Ball Ends: Navigating Pet Ownership on Divorce

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • Agricultural tenancies: back to basics

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • eprivateclient quotes Oliver Little on how tax clarity can help the UK regain confidence among global wealth holders

    Oliver Little

    In the Press

  • Mary Perham and Tristan Tydings write for IFA Magazine on business property relief changes

    Mary Perham

    In the Press

  • Charlie Ring comments in Wealth Briefing on a major financial services transaction between NatWest and Evelyn Partners

    Charlie Ring

    In the Press

  • Lump sum tax regime: higher annual flat tax and grandfathering provision

    Nicola Saccardo

    Quick Reads

  • Family Investment Companies Explained: How Control Shapes Succession Planning

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Hubbis features Jeffrey Lee on the rise of the multi‑hub family office landscape

    Jeffrey Lee

    In the Press

  • Autumn Budget 2025: Extension of Schedule A1 Inheritance Tax “look‑through” to UK agricultural property

    Sarah Wray

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Miranda Fisher on the rise in arbitration for divorces in England and Wales

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Erell Bauduin comments in VOGUE Business on how leading companies approach succession strategy

    Erell Bauduin

    In the Press

  • Succession Planning in Family Investment Companies: What Should Families Consider?

    Mary Perham

    Quick Reads

  • Family Investment Companies: family values, succession and wealth stewardship

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

  • Through the looking glass - transparency in the family courts (reprised).

    Charlotte Posnansky

    Quick Reads

  • Marcus Yorke-Long comments in Spears on the mediation of family wealth disputes

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    In the Press

  • CGT and Excluded Settlors: Reimbursement Risks for Trustees Post April 2025

    Alice Martin

    Insights

  • H2 2025 – Corporate Deal Highlights

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

  • Ahmad Anani and Jihane Rizk write for The Legal Industry Reviews: Qatar Edition on private wealth structures under the QFC regime.

    Ahmad Anani

    In the Press

  • Peter Smith writes for TL4 Middle East Magazine on the rise of arbitration in private wealth disputes

    Peter Smith

    In the Press

  • Cora Hardy comments on partnership dissolution in Farmers Weekly

    Cora Hardy

    In the Press

Back to top