• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

A Question of Quashing: judicial review reform update

On 17 November we provided an update on the Judicial Review and Courts Bill which was at Committee Stage, focusing on how the proposed modifications to certain remedies (including suspended and prospective-only quashing orders) might work in a planning JR context.

The modified remedies have attracted a lot of comment including from the Equality and Human Rights Commission which, as we previously observed, recommended the Government “reconsider proposals extending the use of suspended quashing orders and introducing prospective only quashing orders. Alternatively, it should remove the presumption in favour of making a suspended or prospective only order”.

The Bill had its third reading in the Commons on 25 January 2022 where a significant number of amendments sought to the remedies provision of the Bill were considered. The Opposition tabled amendments intended to mitigate what was described as “the worst effects” of clause 1 of the Bill (which introduces suspended or prospective-only quashing orders together with a presumption in their favour). Such amendments sought:

  • To retain the status quo in terms of remedies with the outright removal of suspended and prospective-only quashing orders;
  • To clarify matters to be taken into account by the Court (eg the ECHR right to an effective remedy and right to provision of a timely remedy) when considering what remedy to award;
  • The removal of the presumption in favour of issuing suspended, prospective-only quashing orders, or in the alternative, amended drafting to bolster the Court’s discretion in determining an appropriate remedy;
  • To protect collateral challenges by ensuring that if a prospective-only or suspended quashing order is made, the legality of the delegated legislation can be relied on as a defence in criminal proceedings.

The above proposed amendments did not pass in the Commons and the Bill has now had its first reading in the Lords on 26 January 2022.

A date for the Lords second reading of the Bill is to be announced but we will watch this space with interest, particularly to see if some of the safeguards sought in the Commons will be reinstated by the Lords.

If you would like to know more about the Bill or our wider planning and Real Estate expertise, please contact Rachael.

Our thinking

  • Retrospectively changing Indefinite Leave to Remain rules for those currently on the 5 year route to a 10 year route is unlawful and unfair

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • UK Immigration Reform – deeper restrictions on the horizon

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • UK Home Office made £329 million profit from Skilled Worker visas in a year but will not replace the Sponsor Management System until late 2028

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Service Providers from Switzerland – 21 reasons why it is probably the most pointless visa in the world.

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • The Swiss Criminal Code on Corruption: Evolution & Developments

    Daniela Iselin

    Insights

  • CDR Magazine quotes Stephen Chan on an agreement to expand mutual recognition of Hong Kong and Mainland Chinese court judgments

    Stephen Chan

    In the Press

  • Environmental Outcome Reporting: Overhauling EIA?

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • Will Brexit lead to the next Windrush scandal? An emerging hostile environment for EU citizens in the UK

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Enforcement of Judgments

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments - DIFC

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • Enforcement of Foreign Judgments - Abu Dhabi

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

  • And the debate rages on: Court of Appeal overturns decision that Govt was guilty of apparent bias in award of contract in breach of procurement rules

    Max Davis

    Quick Reads

  • Can't do right for doing wrong: Government acted unlawfully but outcome would not have been "substantially different" in JR PPE decision

    Max Davis

    Quick Reads

  • Judicial Review Reform

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • Playing fast and loose with justice: estoppel by conduct

    Ben Moore

    Insights

  • Proposed judicial review reform: "Chilling" or "Not terribly dangerous"?

    Max Davis

    Quick Reads

  • Appealing Subsidies: Competition Appeal Tribunal to hear judicial review challenges to the award of industry subsidies under new rules post Brexit.

    Max Davis

    Quick Reads

  • Judicial Review to determine whether England's quarantine hotel policy is an "unlawful deprivation of liberty"

    Quick Reads

Back to top