• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

What Lloyd v Google means for Project Red Card

This week the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the case of Lloyd v Google. Richard Lloyd (the former director of Which? rather than the ex-Television guitarist) had brought a “representative” action against Google for breach of his rights under data protection law, essentially the placing of certain cookies without a lawful basis. A representative action is one in which the claimant makes claims not only on his or her own behalf but also that of others - in this case 5 million or more unidentified individuals alleged to have had their rights similarly infringed. My colleague Jonny McDonald neatly summarises the issues that were at stake here.  

In its earlier judgment, the Court of Appeal had decided that damages could in principle be awarded for mere loss of control of data – without proof of damage. The Supreme Court however was not impressed with Mr Lloyd’s claim and found that the representative action failed, the claimant having failed to produce any proof that wrongful use was made of personal data, or that the individual data subjects in the represented class actually suffered actual damage or distress.

Project Red Card is the campaign by up to 850 footballers and managers to hold to task certain gambling, gaming and data processing companies for the alleged processing of personal data in breach of those individuals’ rights. This Supreme Court judgment is certainly a blow for the campaign because it places an onus on them as claimants – if they want to secure damages – to prove actual damage or distress; it will not be enough merely to show that those individuals “lost control” of their data. So, the team will have to work harder to produce evidence of damage or distress and to persuade any court to accept such evidence. Furthermore, any settlement negotiations will become tougher, the possibility of a judgment in their favour for mere loss of control being off the table.  

While this blow is certainly significant, it is unlikely to be terminal to Project Red Card. It makes claiming damages harder, but certainly not impossible, and does not materially undermine the prospect of injunctive relief. We can expect the Project Red Card team to continue their battle, albeit with somewhat diminished artillery.

techUK, the UK's trade association for technology firms, said that if the judgment had gone the other way, it would "have opened the door for speculative and vexatious claims to be made against data controllers".

Our thinking

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • New FIBA Rule on Payment to Agents

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Quick Reads

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Corporate deal round-up H2 2024

    David Coates

    Insights

  • Navigating the Future: Key trends for Creative and Digital Agencies in 2025

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • Combatting Lookalikes Revisited - clouds lift for brand owners as Thatchers wins its appeal over Aldi copycat cider

    Mary Bagnall

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Mary Bagnall on Aldi’s infringement of Thatchers’ trademark

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • Why Man City took ‘Super “Dry”’ off its Training Kit

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • They think it’s all over … it is now! Are the changes to non-dom status an own goal against our footballers?

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

  • Sports media rights and recent changes to the UK “Listed Events” regime

    Richard Davies

    Insights

  • Keir Gordon and Molly Moseley write for City AM on the Miami Dolphins and Buffalo Bills becoming the first NFL teams to sign private equity deals

    Keir Gordon

    In the Press

  • Cheltenham Cyber Roundtable Insights

    Rebecca Steer

    Quick Reads

  • City AM quotes Mary Bagnall on the Thatchers v Aldi trademark appeal

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • Driving Growth & Innovation with Pan-African Sports Industry Leaders

    Adrian Mayer

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys ‘Client Conversations’ welcomes one of England’s most celebrated male cricketers of the past thirty years, Mark Ramprakash

    Simon Ridpath

    News

  • Client Conversations Podcast: Mark Ramprakash

    Simon Ridpath

    Podcasts

  • An Overview of the Court of Arbitration for Sport

    Benoît Pasquier

    Insights

  • The Use of Arbitration in Resolving Sports Disputes

    Daniel McDonagh

    Insights

  • Charlotte Duly writes for The Law Society Gazette on the Skykick Supreme Court decision and takeaways for trade mark owners

    Charlotte Duly

    In the Press

  • English Rugby En Francais: Does farewell to England mean au revoir to English Law?

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

Back to top