• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Colston Statue Appeal Dismissed

The Planning Inspectorate has rejected an appeal against Bristol City Council's refusal to erect a Marc Quinn's sculpture in place of a statue of slave trader Edward Colston.

Background

When the Grade II listed statue of Edward Colston was pulled down and tossed into the harbour last year, the city was left with a conundrum. What was it to do with the empty plinth? The statue had been recovered, but by then it was clear that it was likely to attract further controversy if restored. It was also clear that leaving the plinth empty was an equally unsatisfactory result. 

Enter Marc Quinn, an artist well known for his public sculpture (readers will recall his contribution to the fourth plinth - a 15 ton marble representation of fellow artist Alison Lapper). Roughly a month after the Colston statue's removal, he secretly erected a black resin and steel statue of Bristolian Black Lives Matter activist, Jen Reid, in its place. 

Despite some tentative initial popularity, Bristol City Council had it removed within 24 hours. 

Shortly afterwards, a planning application was formally lodged to erect the same statue on the Colston plinth for a prolonged 2 year period. It was refused, and the decision appealed to the Planning Inspectorate.

The Appeal

The Inspector presiding over the appeal found that the statue and its base were both part of the Grade II listed building and a part of the city's Conservation Area. They had been removed without planning consent and therefore should be treated as still belonging in situ - no further consent would be needed to return them.

The proposal to replace them for two years with the statue of Jen Reid would, in the Inspector's view, cause less than substantial harm to the monument and Conservation area but. However, even this relatively low level of harm was not justified by the public benefits of the work. As a result, the appeal was rejected.

In a minor win for the appellant, they were paid their costs for the appeal as the Council had refused to engage with the proposal even though it was perfectly valid.

What does this mean for colonial statues and contemporary art?

The Inspector's decision highlights a couple of important points for authorities and iconoclasts alike. Due process needs to be observed when proposing alternatives to listed monuments. An act of physically tearing one down is likely to only be a temporary fix (assuming the monument is not destroyed entirely). However, this requirement rubs both ways. The Inspectorate's approach in this appeal strongly suggests that Councils will not get away with simply ignoring proposals such as Quinn's.

[I]n the absence of any consent to authorise its removal, the fact that the Edward Colston Statue has now been absent for some 14 months does not mean it is no longer a lawful part of this designated heritage asset under the Act. Indeed, when an element of a listed building has been unlawfully removed the expectation is it could be put back without needing listed building consent.

Our thinking

  • Further protection may mean further complications for development in Protected Landscapes

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys continues to develop its Financial Services and Funds practice with the appointment of Racheal Muldoon

    David Collins

    News

  • "AI Battlefields" Conference - Some Highlights

    Nick White

    Quick Reads

  • Housebuilder Highlights of Labour’s first budget

    Nick Burt

    Quick Reads

  • The Budget: further details on reforms to agricultural and business property emerge

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • The Budget: implications for agricultural property relief

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • What can the Housebuilding industry take from Labour’s first 100 days in office?

    James Bateman

    Quick Reads

  • Carrots and sticks - the key to combating climate change

    Phil Webb

    Quick Reads

  • Meghan's American Riviera Orchard trade mark - not quite the setback that the media suggests

    Charlotte Duly

    Quick Reads

  • Election countdown: the Conservatives and Labour's position on housing

    Nick Burt

    Insights

  • A Glimpse into Saudi Arabia's Tourism and Leisure Vision 2030 and Beyond

    Reem Al Mahroos

    Quick Reads

  • Copyright in the Age of AI

    Mark Hill

    Quick Reads

  • What does the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023 mean for nutrient neutrality?

    Sophie Willis

    Insights

  • The countdown to mandatory biodiversity net gain

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • The Levelling-Up and Regeneration Act 2023 & compulsory purchase

    Claire Fallows

    Insights

  • A new option for varying planning permissions

    Titilope Hassan

    Insights

  • The Infrastructure Levy – a new tax on development

    Sophie Willis

    Insights

  • Environmental Outcome Reporting: Overhauling EIA?

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • The Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023: streamlining and simplifying plan making?

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • Autumn Statement provides little comfort for farmers and landowners

    Quick Reads

Back to top