• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Numbers on the boards - another burden for the hospitality industry

Amid staff shortages, volatile supply chains, allergen law changes, VAT rises and rent disputes, new government guidance confirms the scope of another consideration for the out of home sector.

From 6 April 2022, the Calorie Labelling Regulations will come into force and certain businesses in England will be required to provide consumers with kilocalorie information at the point of choice. Simply having this information available upon request is unlikely to be sufficient. Businesses will instead need to update all physical and digital point of sale material, including websites, apps, third party food-delivery platforms, print menus and boards. Failure to do so before the deadline may lead to repercussions: investigation and a fixed penalty notice requiring payment of £2,500, halved on prompt payment and doubled on late payment. Non-payment or non-compliance thereafter may then prompt criminal proceedings. 

This change forms part of the Government's wider plan to tackle obesity and reduce the burden placed on the NHS through obesity-related illnesses by empowering consumers with the information required to make "healthy" decisions. Only time will tell whether that has the intended effect, but the more immediate result may be a poorly-timed increase of red-tape for businesses already reeling from the pandemic, with UKHospitality's call for a six month delay so far falling on deaf ears. Others have criticised the Regulations for doing nothing to address the harm calorie information may have for people with eating disorders by exacerbating feelings of anxiety and guilt (Beat have since published guidance which may assist).

The Regulations should be considered closely alongside the guidance to ensure that the finer detail and exemptions are taken account of. For example temporary items may be exempt altogether, allowing businesses to make seasonal offerings or take advantage of unexpected stock availability such as diverted food waste. Likewise, a customer can "have it their way" without passing a further burden to update calorie information contemporaneously, as the Regulations contain a carve out for additional condiments or customised items. Both are common-sense exceptions, though there is an open question of whether the Regulations do enough to ease the burden on business and allow for creativity and innovation in an already over-encumbered market.

Our thinking

  • Drip Pricing and Enforcement: How the DMCC Act is Changing the Rules

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • The Standard quotes William Marriott on the impact of the newly introduced 'mansion tax' in the UK

    William Marriott

    In the Press

  • UK Hotels Sector 2026: Renovations, AI and Experience‑Led Stays

    James Broadhurst

    Insights

  • Compliance Week quotes Abigail Rushton on the UK’s anti-corruption strategy and compliance lessons for companies and advisors

    Abigail Rushton

    In the Press

  • When Saying “No” to Mediation Is Reasonable: Guidance from Grijns v Grijns

    Bella Preece

    Quick Reads

  • A farm legal resilience checklist: 10-Minute audit to protect your business in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Internet Retailing quotes Jamie Cartwright on the HFSS advertising ban

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Harriet Betteridge, Hannah Catt, Gregoire Uldry and Alex Reid on 2026 predictions in the private wealth space

    Harriet Betteridge

    In the Press

  • Law 360 quotes Caroline Greenwell and Bella Henry on the Santander APP fraud case

    Caroline Greenwell

    In the Press

  • What does 2026 offer for the delivery of energy projects?

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

  • Fake Reviews Under Fire: How the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC Act) Targets Misleading Practices

    Dillon Ravikumar

    Insights

  • Non-EU Courts on the Enforcement of Spain’s Intra-EU Arbitration Awards: Sovereign Immunity and EU Law Objections

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • New Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF) implemented - how might it affect you?

    Vadim Romanoff

    Quick Reads

  • Can a late Payment Notice be treated as a Pay Less Notice: Vision Construct v Gypcraft?

    Henry Dalton

    Insights

  • Cobden v Cobden: the Court of Appeal revisits exceptional circumstances and “proprietary estoppel-ish” equity on dissolution of a farming partnership

    Cora Hardy

    Insights

  • Onshore Wind Community Benefits Roundtable report

    Kevin Gibbs

    Insights

  • Defamation Defences in Practice: Key Takeaways from the case of Noel Clarke v The Guardian

    Ellen Roberts

    Insights

  • Are Dasher, Dancer and Prancer and friends livestock? Can Father Christmas and his reindeer clear UK animal movement rules in a single night?

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • From tweet to trial: Blake v Fox

    Hannah Gornall

    Insights

  • Merry Christmas to farmers and business owners - a surprise (and very welcome) increase to the 100% APR/BPR allowance

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

Back to top