• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Supply chain going flat

Within the space of a just under a week, the UK Government has taken two material interventionist positions in the market. Firstly, to reach terms with the US carbon dioxide plant, CF Industries, to provide short term funding towards its production cost.  Then secondly, to suspend competition law as between fuel companies to allow them to cooperate in sharing information to optimise supply in the light of significant issues in fuel supplies to forecourts.

UK Government support for businesses and/or industry sectors is not unique or unprecedented – see previous support for, amongst others, parts of the steel industry.  The suspension of competition law is rarer and has been seen before in the context of fuel supply in 2012. More recently, competition law was suspended in the early stages of the Pandemic in respect of supermarket supplies to allow supermarkets to consult in respect of stock levels, which is otherwise prohibited under competition law.

The arrangements with CF Industries are of particular interest over the coming weeks as that agreement plays out.  Against a background of dire warnings of potential food shortages, in view of the role that CO2 plays in carbonating drinks and providing shelf life to meat products amongst other uses, the UK Government appeared to consider that it had little alternative but to intervene and to provide financial support. 

Whilst the full details of the arrangements with CF Industries have not been made public, there have been reports that a term of the agreement with CF Industries prevents the UK Government from providing similar such support to other such businesses.  This is notable.  If correct (and that remains a big ‘if’ where the detailed terms are confidential), it appears to reflect the strength of CF’s negotiating position and represents a gamble by the UK Government.

George Eustace, the UK Secretary for the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs has stated that the deal is about “buying the industry time”.  It raises the question as to what happens and what options exist if the market does not ‘right itself’ during the time that has been ‘bought’.  There is, of course, an imperative for the wider industry to begin to move again.  However, the crisis has shown already that if circumstances move against commercial entities with the effect that it is impossible or uneconomical for them to trade, they will cease to do (see also the collapse of a number of businesses in the gas industry).  The underlying need for what they produce remains, with all the ramifications of the potential crisis that prompted the financial support in the first place.  In those circumstances, and if it is correct that the UK Government has committed not to providing support other than to CF Industries, the further options available to the UK Government will be seriously curtailed.  If the issues play out as the UK Government hopes and intends, it has supported an industry and averted a crisis.  If it does not, the UK Government may have backed itself into a corner.

Gas price crisis: Food firms face huge price rise for carbon dioxide - BBC News

Our thinking

  • Habits to Prevent Burnout in Law

    Rebecca Piper

    Events

  • Agricultural law review 2025/2026: Key cases and legislation in 2025 and what’s ahead in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Key Developments in International Arbitration for 2026

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Agricultural policy review 2025: Key changes and what to expect in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • Infosecurity Magazine quotes Mark Bailey on the Cyber Security and Resilience Bill

    Mark Bailey

    In the Press

  • Drip Pricing and Enforcement: How the DMCC Act is Changing the Rules

    Mark Dewar

    Insights

  • Compliance Week quotes Abigail Rushton on the UK’s anti-corruption strategy and compliance lessons for companies and advisors

    Abigail Rushton

    In the Press

  • When Saying “No” to Mediation Is Reasonable: Guidance from Grijns v Grijns

    Bella Preece

    Quick Reads

  • A farm legal resilience checklist: 10-Minute audit to protect your business in 2026

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • Internet Retailing quotes Jamie Cartwright on the HFSS advertising ban

    Jamie Cartwright

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Harriet Betteridge, Hannah Catt, Gregoire Uldry and Alex Reid on 2026 predictions in the private wealth space

    Harriet Betteridge

    In the Press

  • Law 360 quotes Caroline Greenwell and Bella Henry on the Santander APP fraud case

    Caroline Greenwell

    In the Press

  • Fake Reviews Under Fire: How the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC Act) Targets Misleading Practices

    Dillon Ravikumar

    Insights

  • Non-EU Courts on the Enforcement of Spain’s Intra-EU Arbitration Awards: Sovereign Immunity and EU Law Objections

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • New Cryptoasset Reporting Framework (CARF) implemented - how might it affect you?

    Vadim Romanoff

    Quick Reads

  • Cobden v Cobden: the Court of Appeal revisits exceptional circumstances and “proprietary estoppel-ish” equity on dissolution of a farming partnership

    Cora Hardy

    Insights

  • Defamation Defences in Practice: Key Takeaways from the case of Noel Clarke v The Guardian

    Ellen Roberts

    Insights

  • Are Dasher, Dancer and Prancer and friends livestock? Can Father Christmas and his reindeer clear UK animal movement rules in a single night?

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • From tweet to trial: Blake v Fox

    Hannah Gornall

    Insights

  • Merry Christmas to farmers and business owners - a surprise (and very welcome) increase to the 100% APR/BPR allowance

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

Back to top