• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

WHAT NEXT FOR NIGHTCLUBS?

min read

Following 19 July 2021 (so called, “Freedom Day”), nightclubs and late-night venues re-opened. However, measures have remained in place that can impact a venue’s ability to open and it seems that further measures may be introduced in the winter that will impact venues.

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) (No.3) Regulations 2020 (No. 3 Regulations) (‘the Regulations”) gives local authorities the power to make directions which respond to a serious or imminent threat to public health. A direction can include (amongst other things) the power to restrict access to, or close, individual premises.

In practice, this has meant that, since Freedom Day, venues (and with particular emphasis on nightclubs and late-night venues) have still had to respond to and implement recommendations made by local authorities in order to avoid the risk of closure. Many venues will have co-operated fully with the local authority. However, this can present practical and legal issues for venues in what is achievable. There is, at least, anecdotal evidence of voluntary closures in consultation with the local authority to avoid imposed closures and the potential stigma from that.

Under the Regulations, any direction must be necessary and proportionate in order to maintain the transmission of coronavirus in the local authority’s area. Before making such direction the local authority must gather evidence to support its decision. This, for example, could include (but, is not limited to) information from NHS Track and Trace, Public Health England, COVID-19 transmission rates in the area and, information about whether business owners are following the working safely guidelines, or any other relevant guidance applicable to the business. This means that local authorities can base their decisions on a wide-range of factors and can give rise to different local authorities applying different criteria and subjective decision making. Practically, that can be difficult for venues to manage.

Once a direction is issued, a local authority must review the direction at least once every 7 days. In terms of legal recourse, a local authority’s decision can be appealed via the Magistrates Court or to the Secretary of State for Health. But, in many cases, that will simply not be practical or economically viable for venues. The alternative is therefore for venues to work with local authorities to avoid closure.

The Regulations will continue to apply until the end of 27 September 2021 (albeit the Regulations have been extended before) but are then set to fall away as matters stand, removing a significant power available to local authorities to manage the pandemic. However, it seems that further measures may be introduced in the winter which may impact venues. Notably, the government recently scrapped plans for “covid passports” for nightclubs and late-night venues from 1 October 2021. But, this week the government has announced the Covid-19 Response: Autumn and Winter Plan (the “Winter Plan”), which sets out the government’s proposed response to COVID-19 over the coming months. The Winter Plan (under Plan B) includes the government’s right to reintroduce such measures at short notice if coronavirus cases rise. Therefore, in practical terms, for venues, maintaining many existing Covid measures despite the removal of local authority powers may make sense or at least retaining the ability to re-introduce speedily and at limited cost. As we have seen throughout this pandemic, decisions have been subject to u-turns in the past and it is not inconceivable that they will be again.

Plans to introduce vaccine passports for access into nightclubs and large events in England will not go ahead, the health secretary has said.

Our thinking

  • Virtual Currency Regulation: United Arab Emirates

    Sara Sheffield

    Insights

    min read
  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • France Modernises Its Arbitration Law: What Does Decree No. 2026-741 Change?

    Simon Le Wita

    Insights

    min read
  • Disclosing Settlement Agreements in Due Diligence: Navigating Confidentiality and Risk

    Hannah Gornall

    Insights

    min read
  • Cryptocurrency crime in Switzerland

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

    min read
  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to just and equitable winding up

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Norwich Pharmacal Orders and Bankers Trust Orders: A Practical Guide to Obtaining Information and Tracing Assets

    Martha Lazanakis

    Insights

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write in the Law Society Gazette about the new corporate liability for criminal offences committed by senior managers

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
  • Arbitration of Trust Disputes Webinar

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

    min read
  • Caveat Venditor?: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Sale and Purchase Agreements

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Restraint and Confiscation Orders in England and Wales

    Jana Billington

    Insights

    min read
  • Henry Winter and Jeffrey Lee write in Hubbis about arbitration and cross-border family wealth in Asia

    Henry Winter

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge and Lyla Gilbert write in Sustainable Views about how sustainable packaging is becoming a condition of EU market access

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Fowl Play: Lessons from Lux Films Ltd v Fowler & Anor [2026] EWHC 963 (KB)

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Genuine Belief Is Not Enough: Supreme Court Confirms Section 172 Demands Good Faith in Conduct, Not Just Thought

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Can you terminate an “indefinite” trade mark licence even if there’s no express right to do so?

    Isabella Ross-Skinner

    Insights

    min read
  • Kerry Stares, Rory Partridge, and Lyla Gilbert write in Packaging Europe about landmark reforms on packaging sustainability regulations in the UK and Europe

    Kerry Stares

    In the Press

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath discusses Charles Russell Speechlys' strategic US expansion with Legal Business

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top