• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Flexible working requests: 5 tips for employers

min read

In a recent case, an estate agent has demonstrated the consequences of refusing a flexible working request after being ordered to pay almost £185,000 for indirect sex discrimination to a former employee.

In Thompson v Scancrown Ltd trading as Manors, the claimant was employed as a sales manager by the Respondent, an independent estate agent. Following a period of maternity leave, the claimant made an unsuccessful application to work shorter hours to collect her daughter from nursery. When this application was refused, the claimant resigned and filed several claims, including indirect sex discrimination.

The Tribunal found that the Respondent’s failure to consider this flexible working request put the claimant at a disadvantage and upheld her claim for indirect sex discrimination, awarding £184,961.32 for loss of earnings, loss of pension contributions, injury to feelings, and interest.

This recent judgment has reaffirmed the need for employers to carefully consider all flexible working requests and ensure that rejecting the proposed change is an appropriate response given the significant potential liabilities if found to be discriminating against a claimant. For those employees protected under the Equality Act 2010 in these circumstances, there is no limit on the amount of compensation that can be awarded for such claims. Albeit each case is considered according to its own facts, this protection includes women requesting flexible working to ensure they can access childcare.

Employers are finding a sharp rise in requests from a variety of different employees relating to where, how and when they work. A recent report from McKinsey found that 52% of all workers would prefer a more flexible working model post-pandemic. However, working from home per se is unlikely to become a strict legal right for everyone after the indication by the Flexible Working Taskforce, the body advising the Government on flexible working, that they would not support such a move. Nonetheless, employees who have enjoyed the benefits of hybrid or remote ways of working are still able to turn to statutory flexible working requests if they are required to return to work this autumn and many are doing so with the added layer of protection from discrimination laws for those women seeking flexibility for childcare reasons.

5 Tips for Employers

What should employers bear in mind?

  1. Statutory flexible working requests may only be refused on eight grounds, including costs, ability to meet customer demand, and inability to reorganise work. If there is a valid business reason for refusing a request, an employer should consider suggesting an alternative working arrangement in discussion with the employee and seek agreement where possible. Due to the rise of remote working since the pandemic, many employers will now find it harder to refuse requests on the basis that certain work cannot be done from home, remotely, or during flexible hours.
  2. Always remember that this refusal of the statutory request is not the end of the story as the refusal may also have to be justified in the Tribunal if it is a policy or practice the employer follows which disproportionately affects a person with a protected characteristic, for example, mothers needing flexibility for childcare, and it cannot be fully justified. In reality, Tribunals will want to see evidence of proper training for all decision makers and a fair system in place for assessing the impact of the proposed change on the business and other workers, based on proven facts in order to allow such justification defence. Employers should therefore, where possible, consider a trial period for a reasonable length of time in order to adequately assess the impact of modified working arrangements on their workplace.
  3. Employers should remain consistent in their treatment of these requests and keep clear records of their reasoning when making decisions.
  4. Employers should consult their existing policies and practices for flexible working, which ideally will incorporate the statutory requirements and principles outlined above and from the Acas Code of Practice.
  5. Employers are required to deal with requests in a reasonable manner, which includes processing requests with no undue delay and within a three-month time limit, and offering a right to appeal wherever possible.

"Here the claimant resented that flexible working appeared not to be considered properly - as in our finding it was not - and felt that this was an injustice because of her sex, which it was."

Our thinking

  • ITV News interviews Ben Smith about a parliamentary debate around statutory menstrual leave

    Ben Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Chiara Muston comments in People Management on 'empty time' and the gig economy

    Chiara Muston

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys strengthens its position in the latest Legal 500 EMEA directory, with 22 firm rankings

    News

    min read
  • Navigating the Employment Rights Act 2025

    Ben Smith

    Events

  • UAE Guidance to Employers

    Michael Powner

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Clarity on Practice Direction No.1 of 2025 in employment law proceedings

    Nick Hurley

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Food & Beverage Lookahead 2026

    Olivia Gray

    Insights

    min read
  • The Employment (Allocation of Tips) Act 2023 – practical impact since implementation

    Chiara Muston

    Insights

    min read
  • Retail and Consumer Lookahead 2026

    Rachel Bell

    Insights

    min read
  • Day-one sick pay: costs, opportunities and practical steps for Retail and Food & Beverage businesses

    Chiara Muston

    Insights

    min read
  • What to Expect in Employment Law in 2026

    Nick Hurley

    Insights

    min read
  • The Daily Telegraph quotes Nick Hurley on Labour’s plans to ban ‘non-compete’ agreements in the UK

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

    min read
  • The Daily Telegraph quotes Nick Hurley on the impact of incoming reforms to the Employment Rights Act on businesses of all sizes

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

    min read
  • Why the new Border Act puts every workplace and beyond on the menu

    Emily McPartland

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The Times, City AM and the Daily Mail quote Dan Pollard on government plans to remove the cap on unfair dismissal claims

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

    min read
  • The Guardian and The i quote Emily Chalkley on the UK government's U-turn on day one employment rights

    Emily Chalkley

    In the Press

    min read
  • AI and Employment Law: Fairness, Transparency and Workplace Risk

    Emily Chalkley

    Insights

    min read
  • Swiss Employment Law: Your Essential Guide to Contracts, Rights, and Regulations

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • City AM quotes Dan Pollard on a number of amendments to the Employment Rights Bill being rejected by the House of Lords

    Dan Pollard

    In the Press

    min read
  • BBC News quotes Nick Hurley on the $55 billion purchase of Electronic Arts

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top