• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Bupa-style divorce – a further trend arising from the pandemic

Converse to the baby boom, it has widely been reported that lockdown has sadly resulted in a record surge of divorce enquiries. This has added to the significant strain on the Family Court resulting in long delays and in many cases has led to an increase in costs.

Arbitration has always been a popular method of resolving commercial disputes (particularly international ones) where no agreement can be reached by mediation or otherwise. Whilst it has been possible to choose arbitration in family cases since 2012, the take-up has been slow and it has been said to have largely been reserved for financial disputes for the rich and famous as it guarantees a private forum and can lead to a more speedy resolution, avoiding the public nature of the Court arena. Recent case law has clarified the Family Court’s approach to arbitration and resolved the ‘procedural chaos’ which was said to have existed previously. It is therefore thought that this may encourage more parties to attempt arbitration as a viable method of dispute resolution in the family arena.

It was also recently reported in The Times that a rising number of divorcing couples are choosing “Bupa-style” private hearings to avoid the delays and the uncertainty of the Family Courts. In practice, this means that experienced lawyers and retired judges are paid to act as private judges and arbitrate disputes over money and children, outside the Court system. To be certified as an arbitrator requires at least ten years of experience as a solicitor or barrister and a two-day training course.

The timescales of family court proceedings have increased substantially since the beginning of the pandemic and many cases can take well in excess of a year to conclude through the court (an average increase of about 3 months since the start of 2020). Further frustration arises because of delays and cancellations, particularly affecting financial disputes. This is because cases involving the safety of children are prioritised, rightly so, and particularly at the start of the pandemic resulted in financial disputes being removed from the court list often at the last minute. By then however, the financial cost (and indeed the emotional cost) can be significant, as not only have barristers prepared for the hearing but solicitors costs have been incurred in correspondence and often failed attempts to try and reach a settlement. Mediation might already have taken place, adding an additional layer of costs.

These delays and uncertainty have seemingly persuaded parties who want speedy results to pay for an arbitrator and effectively bypass the Court system. The arbitral award would then need to be converted into a consent order and sent to the Family Court for approval and in addition therefore to the binding nature of the ruling, the advantages are cost, speed and the certainty that once the arbitrator is booked, the arbitration goes ahead.

It seems therefore that the instruction of an arbitrator offers a credible and cost effective solution and may just prevent the topic of the frustration of waiting for a divorce being added to the conversational irritations following the pandemic, such as the ludicrous hike in puppy prices, the baby boom, the tiresome restrictions on travel and last but not least, the Country’s endless baking of banana bread!

A rising number of divorcing couples are choosing “Bupa-style” private hearings to avoid the delays and uncertainty of the family courts.

Our thinking

  • Collateral Warranties and Third Party Rights: Everything You Need to Know

    Chris Marks

    Insights

  • Supreme Court overturns Court of Appeal decision: Statutory adjudication will not apply to a typical collateral warranty

    Kevin Forsyth

    Insights

  • IET’s new revision 7 of the Model Form of Contract (MF/1): What has changed?

    Melanie Tomlin

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys reports domestic and international growth across all practice areas

    Simon Ridpath

    News

  • The EU AI Act: A Beginner’s Guide for UK and International Businesses using AI

    Janine Regan

    Insights

  • Spear's quotes Julia Cox on the Autumn Statement providing greater clarity for HNWIs post-election result

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Rent recovery and tenant insolvency - Estates Gazette Q&A

    Harriet Durn

    Insights

  • So Keir we are - how will a Labour government affect (property) investment in healthcare

    Mark White

    Quick Reads

  • Election Countdown: What might a Labour government mean for UK business?

    Caroline Carter

    Insights

  • The Telegraph quotes Tristram van Lawick on the strength of the country estate market

    Tristram van Lawick

    In the Press

  • Delving into the detail of facade repairs - Estates Gazette Q&A

    Sylwia Jatczak

    Insights

  • Gaining insights on forfeiture - Estates Gazette Q&A

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • Property Patter: Hotels

    Naomi Nettleton

    Podcasts

  • Employment Law & Worker Rights – The Labour Manifesto

    Nick Hurley

    Insights

  • Employment Law & Worker Rights - The Conservative Party’s Manifesto

    Nick Hurley

    Insights

  • Employment Law & Worker Rights - The Liberal Democrats Manifesto

    Nick Hurley

    Insights

  • The Africa Debate: Africa’s role in a changing global order

    Matthew Hobbs

    Quick Reads

  • Re UKCloud: The importance of exercising control over a fixed charge asset

    Cara Whiffin

    Insights

  • The Lawyer covers our Training Contract support, in light of the shift to the SQE

    Karen Stages

    In the Press

  • Volunteers’ Week 2024: Celebrating Our People

    News

Back to top