• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Don't Spin the Greenwashing

Brands are increasingly putting sustainability and environmentalism at the core of their identities. With environmentally conscious consumers demanding greener products, brands have been under more pressure than ever before to publicise their environmental credentials. This pressure looks set to increase further as research suggests sustainability has been a bigger concern for consumers since the Covid-19 pandemic began.

Perhaps it’s inevitable therefore that some companies have been tempted to exaggerate their green credentials. But to what extent is this a problem for consumers and brands alike?

The rise of greenwashing has put a sharp focus on the claims various companies and brands use as part of their marketing. “Greenwashing” is a term used to describe companies which give a false or misleading impression about their impact on the environment. It was first coined in 1986 by environmentalist Jay Westerveld to describe a hotel that claimed to reuse towels to help the planet when actually it was just trying to save money.

Soft drinks giant Coca-Cola recently faced legal action by US environmental group The Earth Island Institute for greenwashing. They argued that Coca-Cola couldn’t label itself as sustainable or environmentally friendly while continuing to generate millions of tonnes of plastic waste every year. Coca-Cola are not alone; plant-based business Oatly has also been accused of misleading consumers, an allegation Oatly has denied.

Marketing has always involved an element of spin. How many people actually thought Red Bull could give you wings? However, this is different, particularly as the claims cannot be easily fact-checked by the consumer and so have to be accepted on face value.

This is where regulators are increasingly stepping in. In November 2020, the CMA launched an investigation into misleading environmental claims and ASA are also considering how effective current rules are in governing environmental claims. Draft guidance released by the CMA in May 2021 proposed all environment claims should follow six key principles, including that “businesses should be able to back up their claims with robust, credible and up-to-date evidence.”

Greenwashing does provide some good news. It shows the efforts brands are willing to make to respond to the environmental concerns of its consumers. Whilst litigation and regulatory pressure may not have a huge impact at present, the real issue is likely to be reputational damage. Bad publicity may lead to consumers switching their allegiance to brands which are perceived as greener and more environmentally sustainable.

Brands have always competed on price, but increasingly they will compete on sustainability. The question is whether brands can really afford to simply provide lip service to consumer expectations? The cost of greenwashing may prove more expensive than the environmental initiatives themselves.

How to spot greenwashing and why brands were caught out

Our thinking

  • An introduction to the new Procurement Act 2023

    Jamie Cartwright

    Quick Reads

  • Mind the Gap Trade Mark

    Charlotte Duly

    Insights

  • A Closer Look at the Meaning of ‘Investor’ in Investment Treaty Arbitration

    Stephen Chan

    Insights

  • Shareholder Strategies: A practical guide to unfair prejudice petitions

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

  • New food and drink ads regulation & impact on live sports broadcasts

    Sarah Johnson

    Insights

  • AML in decentralized finance and traditional finance

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

  • International Arbitration: 2024 in Review

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

  • Has the UAE recognised the principle of Without Prejudice Privilege?

    Maher Al Nashar

    Quick Reads

  • Appointment of company directors – who can do it and how?

    Stephen Burns

    Insights

  • Further protection may mean further complications for development in Protected Landscapes

    Sophie Willis

    Quick Reads

  • The UK’s Clean Power 2030 Action Plan

    Rachael Davidson

    Insights

  • Great British Energy: Planning for a Greener Britain

    Charlotte Inglis

    Insights

  • Insights from FRC’s review of Climate-related Financial Disclosures (“CFD”) by AIM and large private companies

    Megan Gray

    Quick Reads

  • Understanding Contempt of Court in Swiss Law: Key Provisions and Penalties

    Remo Wagner

    Insights

  • Howells v Newport City Council: beware not to lose the private key to your cryptocurrency wallet

    Sonia Kenawy

    Insights

  • Combatting Lookalikes Revisited - clouds lift for brand owners as Thatchers wins its appeal over Aldi copycat cider

    Mary Bagnall

    Insights

  • Legal developments set to shape the UK’s Real Estate sector in 2025

    Sarah Morley

    Insights

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Mary Bagnall on Aldi’s infringement of Thatchers’ trademark

    Mary Bagnall

    In the Press

  • Justice for the Victims of Britain's Largest Ponzi Scheme?

    Caroline Greenwell

    Quick Reads

  • Understanding Civil and Criminal Remedies in France for Financial Crimes

    Frédéric Jeannin

    Insights

Back to top