• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

DBS publishes Annual Report - Barred list grows by over 4,000

The Disclosure and Barring Service have released their detailed annual report, including granular data for their services provided. Unsurprisingly, Covid-19 has had an impact. 

The report unveils some interesting information, for example that 486,802 Fast Track Enhanced DBS Certificate applications were made for roles to support the Covid-19 response, including 66,720 vaccinators. It also showed that whilst the number of barred individuals grew from 77,921 to 81,941 only 139 appeals were lodged against decisions to place individuals on the barred list, despite the severe ramifications of those decisions. It is not clear from the report how many barring decisions were avoided by the individual making representations against such a decision.

The Disclosure and Barring Service is responsible for providing disclosure and barring functions for the workplace and voluntary sector. It maintains the adults' and children's Barred Lists (of individuals posing a potential risk to children and vulnerable adults) and issues certificates with information (including criminal records) to assist in deciding whether an individual should engage in regulated activity (certain positions of trust).

The Safeguarding of Vulnerable Groups Act (2006) and Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 together created the Independent Safeguarding Authority and merged it with the Criminal Records Bureau to create the Disclosure and Barring Service. The acts also envisaged, but never implemented, a duty to check an individual's barred status and/or obtain a DBS check to ensure that they are appropriate for a certain role. 

Instead, the scheme is enforced through a series of criminal offences designed to prevent barred individuals from working in regulated activities. The following are all criminal offences under the acts; engaging or offering to engage in regulated activity whilst barred from doing so, permitting an individual to engage in regulated activity which you know or have reason to believe they are barred from, and failing to provide specified safeguarding information to the DBS. Sanctions for those offences include unlimited fines and/or up to five years in prison. Where an organisation commits either of the latter offences, both the organisation itself and the officers responsible for the relevant decision may be liable. The DBS is not prescriptive in its remit, and so the scope of those who "engage" in "regulated" activity is ambiguous as a result, as is the definition of  "reason to believe". Deciding whether an individual is engaging in regulated activity is therefore an act of discretion, where many choose to undertake appropriate DBS checks before deciding whether to place someone in any position of trust. 

The above regime, criminal offences and barring implications (as well as options to challenge and appeal) are neither well known nor communicated in clear language. Whilst the purposive approach and wide remit of the DBS assists in achieving its aims of ensuring safeguarding, the ambiguous and retrospective nature of their interventions place a significant burden on many, especially those in industries whose activities may fall either side of "regulated activity". This is complicated further by the difficulties obtaining, handling and justifying DBS checks from a regulatory and data protection perspective. It is therefore disappointing that the annual report shows no intention for major reform to front load those responsibilities by implementing the intended duty or making clear who needs to obtain a check and when. 

This year has been challenging for
the delivery of disclosure services.
The COVID-19 pandemic has
influenced the behaviour of our
customers. Compared to previous
years we have experienced a
change to both the profile and
total number of applications
received for all DBS products.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2024

    Charlotte Ford


  • Collateral Warranty and Third Party Rights: Everything You Need to Know

    Chris Marks


  • Supreme Court overturns Court of Appeal decision: Statutory adjudication will not apply to a typical collateral warranty

    Kevin Forsyth


  • IET’s new revision 7 of the Model Form of Contract (MF/1): What has changed?

    Melanie Tomlin


  • Game On for Hong Kong’s Sports Arbitration

    Patrick Chan


  • Darren Bailey and Frédéric Jeannin write for City AM on geopolitical risk and challenges posed to Paris by staging the Olympic Games

    Darren Bailey

    In the Press

  • CoStar quotes Claire Fallows and Ben Butterworth on some of the key real estate issues addressed in the King's Speech

    Claire Fallows

    In the Press

  • Company Representation in Swiss Conciliation Hearings: Who Holds the Reins?

    Remo Wagner


  • “We want prenup! We want prenup!” (Yeah!)

    Cara Fung

    Quick Reads

  • Insolvency Insights: Maximising Recovery – DIFC Courts actions in aid of foreign liquidations

    Nicola Jackson


  • Charles Russell Speechlys reports domestic and international growth across all practice areas

    Simon Ridpath


  • The EU AI Act: A Beginner’s Guide for UK and International Businesses using AI

    Janine Regan


  • ADGM Court holds that NMC can bring fraudulent and wrongful trading claims retroactively

    Nicola Jackson

    Quick Reads

  • When does new safety regime apply to commercial units?

    Emma Humphreys


  • What is the purpose? A landmark ruling in Hong Kong on Quistclose trusts and insolvency

    Stephen Chan


  • Personnel Today quotes Nick Hurley on what Labour's election win means for employment law

    Nick Hurley

    In the Press

  • So Keir we are - how will a Labour government affect (property) investment in healthcare

    Mark White

    Quick Reads

  • First QFC Court Judgment on Setting Aside Arbitral Awards

    Alim Khamis FCIArb


  • Will 2024 be a record year for the number of insolvencies in France?

    Dimitri A. Sonier

    Quick Reads

  • Election Countdown: What might a Labour government mean for UK business?

    Caroline Carter


Back to top