• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Protecting contested cultural objects from seizure in the UK

 A Private Members’ Bill to extend the protection of cultural objects from seizure or forfeiture had its first reading in the House of Commons earlier this month. 

The UK government enacted the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act in 2007. It provides that cultural objects and artworks from overseas are protected from seizure by the UK courts while in the UK as long as they are only on temporary loan to an approved museum or gallery. The current regime is designed to ensure UK institutions can borrow important items for display in the UK even if their ownership is contested, as long as certain criteria are met.

To become an approved institution under the regime, a museum or gallery must demonstrate that it has followed due diligence guidelines on borrowing cultural objects and artworks and has published information on the item’s provenance. While an institution need only apply for approval once, every new loan must meet certain requirements, including that the object is usually kept outside the UK and owned by a non-UK resident and that the import of the object into the UK does not in itself contravene any laws. 

It remains to be seen what extensions to the current regime might be proposed in the new Bill, the text of which has not yet been published. The introduction of the current legislation in 2007 was expedited to ensure that the Royal Academy could secure loans of Impressionist and Modernist works from Russian public collections where claims in the UK courts by descendants of the original owners were considered to be likely. 

It remains to be seen whether the Bill's proposed extension of protections for cultural objects is related to a specific item or exhibition, or if there is another motivation. The second reading of the Bill is scheduled for 10 September this year.

A Bill to extend the protection from seizure or forfeiture given to cultural objects.

Our thinking

  • Sun, Sea and Suspicious Parties - Children Holiday Disputes

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

  • James Elliott-Hughes writes for Wealth Briefing on Post-Separation Accrual

    James Elliott-Hughes

    In the Press

  • The Murdochs and the Buffetts – succession planning for billionaires

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • LCIA's 2024 Casework Report – Still Going Strong

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Jurisdictions: choosing the right base for your family office

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Catrin Harrison on wealthy individuals increasingly using life insurance to manage inheritance tax bills

    Catrin Harrison

    In the Press

  • Serious failings by Trustee amount to a breach of trust: Charles Russell Speechlys advises the Hon. Mrs Dawson-Damer in appeal of long-running trust dispute

    Ziva Robertson

    News

  • Professional Adviser quotes Julia Cox on the potential for a future UK 'wealth tax'

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Major Italian National newspaper La Repubblica quotes Marcus Yorke-Long on succession in family businesses

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    In the Press

  • Maddie Dunn writes for Farmers Guardian on last month’s Spending Review and the Government’s attitude to farming

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

  • Thomas Moran and Ruth Morris write for Prime Resi on the Prime London market and the wider impact of rental reform

    Thomas Moran

    In the Press

  • UK tax considerations for US persons relocating to the UK

    Matthew Radcliffe

    Insights

  • Offshore trusts: Have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Keeping compliant: Navigating SFO regulations globally

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

  • Q&As: The Evolution of Family Offices

    Amira Shaker-Bortman

    Insights

  • Next Gen: Upholding family values

    Elinor Boote

    Insights

  • Relocation: Important factors to consider before moving

    Insights

  • The Two Most Feared Foreign Tax Provisions in the One Big, Beautiful Bill: Now Eliminated or Defanged

    Ivan Lu

    Quick Reads

  • The decision in Standish Stands Up for Prenups – Huge boost for prenups as Supreme Court decision underscores asset protection

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Courts are not couples’ therapists - and that’s a good thing

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

Back to top