• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Possible reform for couples choosing not to "tie the knot"....

According to the Office for National Statistics there was estimated to be 3.5m cohabiting couple families in 2020. It is generally accepted that cohabitation is on the rise and the fastest growing type of family in the UK. In 2000 there was estimated to be only 1.2m cohabitating couple families in the UK and in 2010 this jumped to 2.8m.

People choose to cohabit, rather than marry, for all sorts of reasons – to test their relationship before marriage, because they do not want to get married (perhaps they have been married before and do not wish to do so again), for convenience, etc. Attitudes towards cohabitation have also changed over the years and it is now much more accepted and part of the norm.  

It is a commonly held misconception that cohabitating couples have financial claims against the other upon the breakdown of their relationship and it can come as quite a shock to learn that this is not in fact the case. Worryingly, the National Centre for Social Research published an article in 2019 reporting that 46% of people in England and Wales thought that there was a concept in law in England and Wales of a ‘common law spouse’. For the avoidance of doubt, this is not the case.

Married couples/couples in a civil partnership are much better protected financially than cohabiting couples on separation. So what can cohabiting partners do to protect themselves under the current law? One way is to enter into a Cohabitation Agreement which sets out what the parties would like to happen in the event of separation and also in the event of illness or death of one party. Couples can enter into a Cohabitation Agreement at any stage, although it is better if it is entered into before the cohabitation begins. Cohabitation Agreements are bespoke and can be adapted to suit the couples specific needs. They can include agreements on how the rent, mortgage and utilities are paid, arrangements for any children, arrangements for any pets and how properties or other assets (such as any savings in joint accounts) are to be split in the event of separation. In order to be valid a Cohabitation Agreement will need to be:

  • Entered into freely and voluntarily;
  • In the form of a deed;
  • Validly signed by both parties; and
  • Kept up to date in the event of changes, such as buying a property, having children, etc.

The Women and Equalities Committee are underway with an inquiry to examine what legislation to protect cohabiting couples upon separation could look like and how this may be introduced. The Committee are currently in the process of gathering evidence and the key questions they intend to consider are:

  • Should there be a legal definition of cohabitation and, if so, what should it be?
  • What legislative changes, if any, are needed to better protect the rights of cohabiting partners in the event of death or separation?
  • What equalities issues are raised by the lack of legal protection for those in cohabiting relationships?
  • Should legal changes be made to better provide for the children of cohabiting partners?
  • Should cohabiting partners have the same rights as those who are married or in a civil partnership?
  • Are there examples of good practice in relation to the rights of cohabiting partners in the UK or internationally that the Government should seek to emulate in England and Wales?

This is not the first time this issue has been considered and the Law Commission prepared a report back in July 2007 setting out some proposed recommendations, which were ultimately not taken forward by the Government. These recommendations included:

  • Enabling eligible cohabiting partners to apply for financial relief on separation in accordance with a statutory scheme;
  • Defining eligible cohabiting partners as a couple who (1) have lived together as a joint household for a period of between 2-5 years; or (2) have a child together either before, during or after a period of cohabitation. Including cohabiting partners who are married to, or civil partners of, or cohabiting with another party and excluding cohabiting partners where sexual activity between them would constitute a criminal offence.
  • Enabling eligible cohabiting partners to “opt-out” of the statute, rather than having an "opt-in" scheme.

If you have any evidence for the current inquiry you can submit this until Sunday 4 July. It will be interesting to see what the result of the inquiry will be.

The Committee will examine what legal protection for cohabiting couples could look like and how this might be introduced.

Our thinking

  • Sun, Sea and Suspicious Parties - Children Holiday Disputes

    Joshua Green

    Quick Reads

  • James Elliott-Hughes writes for Wealth Briefing on Post-Separation Accrual

    James Elliott-Hughes

    In the Press

  • The Murdochs and the Buffetts – succession planning for billionaires

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • LCIA's 2024 Casework Report – Still Going Strong

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Jurisdictions: choosing the right base for your family office

    Insights

  • The Financial Times quotes Catrin Harrison on wealthy individuals increasingly using life insurance to manage inheritance tax bills

    Catrin Harrison

    In the Press

  • Serious failings by Trustee amount to a breach of trust: Charles Russell Speechlys advises the Hon. Mrs Dawson-Damer in appeal of long-running trust dispute

    Ziva Robertson

    News

  • Professional Adviser quotes Julia Cox on the potential for a future UK 'wealth tax'

    Julia Cox

    In the Press

  • Major Italian National newspaper La Repubblica quotes Marcus Yorke-Long on succession in family businesses

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    In the Press

  • Maddie Dunn writes for Farmers Guardian on last month’s Spending Review and the Government’s attitude to farming

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

  • Thomas Moran and Ruth Morris write for Prime Resi on the Prime London market and the wider impact of rental reform

    Thomas Moran

    In the Press

  • UK tax considerations for US persons relocating to the UK

    Matthew Radcliffe

    Insights

  • Offshore trusts: Have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Keeping compliant: Navigating SFO regulations globally

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

  • Q&As: The Evolution of Family Offices

    Amira Shaker-Bortman

    Insights

  • Next Gen: Upholding family values

    Elinor Boote

    Insights

  • Relocation: Important factors to consider before moving

    Insights

  • The Two Most Feared Foreign Tax Provisions in the One Big, Beautiful Bill: Now Eliminated or Defanged

    Ivan Lu

    Quick Reads

  • The decision in Standish Stands Up for Prenups – Huge boost for prenups as Supreme Court decision underscores asset protection

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Courts are not couples’ therapists - and that’s a good thing

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

Back to top