• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Domestic Abuse Bill - strengthened protection for victims

From its publication in January 2019 it has always been clear that the Domestic Abuse Bill will be a landmark piece of legislation.  It has been a long time coming, having evolved from a consultation launched in 2018 but having been subsequently delayed by Parliament's dissolution for the last general election in late 2019. Fortunately it is now making progress and all being well it will be enacted soon.

The Bill creates, for the first time, a cross-government statutory definition of domestic abuse, which makes clear that abuse can be emotional or economic and includes coercive and controlling behaviour; it is not limited to physical violence. It will establish a new office of 'Domestic Abuse Commissioner', whose duties include providing public leadership on domestic abuse issues and will play a key role in overseeing and monitoring the provision of domestic abuse services in England and Wales.  Also important is the provision in the bill which means that victims of domestic abuse will be protected from being cross examined in court by their former partners. This has happened in the past, but is recognised as often being a form of abuse itself.  Details of the other provisions in the Bill are beyond the scope of this article, but have been widely covered elsewhere (see for example www.gov.uk/government/publications/domestic-abuse-bill-2020-factsheets/domestic-abuse-bill-2020-overarching-factsheet).  

However, the focus of this article is on the new amendments to the Bill that will be presented this week and were announced on 1 March 2021. 

First, the proposed legislation around controlling and coercive behaviour will be extended so that it will no longer be restricted to situations where the abusers and victims continue to live together. This change rightly recognises that even after a physical separation it is possible for abusive partners to sustain, or even increase, their controlling or coercive behaviour. 

Second, the law surrounding "revenge porn", first introduced in 2015, will be widened.  Instead of merely criminalising the disclosure of intimate images, the Bill provides that threats to disclose intimate images with the intention to cause distress will now become an offence punishable by up to 2 years in prison.

Finally, a new offence of non-fatal strangulation will be created. This will be punishable by up to 5 years in prison. Non-fatal strangulation is sometimes used by abusers to control or intimidate the victim, but often leave no injury.  The Bill will facilitate prosecution and will address an anomaly which often allowed perpetrators to escape prosecution in cases where they had stopped their abuse prior to a fatal outcome.

Further amendments to the Bill are expected to be announced during the course of this week, all aimed at supporting victims and offering better protection from perpetrators of domestic abuse. As the Lord Chancellor commented, "This Bill provides a once-in a generation opportunity to strengthen our response to domestic abuse and its many forms".  The Safeguarding Minister called it "...a game-changing piece of legislation."  

Its passage has been slow, but the Bill is being given the care and attention it needs to provide necessary protection and will be well worth the wait when enacted. Soon, it is hoped.

A raft of new amendments to the Domestic Abuse Bill will be presented, providing greater protections for victims and further clamping down on perpetrators.

Our thinking

  • Understanding Vacant Possession: A Key Element in Property Transactions

    Emma Preece

    Insights

  • Gaven Cheong quoted in CNBC on Hong Kong’s appeal to family offices amid geopolitical uncertainty

    Gaven Cheong

    In the Press

  • Cristiana Felisi comments in We Wealth on adoption in special cases and the change of a child’s surname

    Maria Cristiana Felisi

    In the Press

  • Family Offices Across Generations: Purpose, Trends, and Key Considerations

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

  • Martyn’s Law: What Historic Houses Need to Know

    Naomi Nettleton

    Insights

  • Child Maintenance and Sport: A Game of Two Halves

    David Carver

    Quick Reads

  • Commonhold: Best Supporting Tenure or Leading Role?

    Sarah Bradd

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys Strengthens Swiss Tax Capabilities with Appointment of Frédéric Ney in Geneva

    Frédéric Ney

    News

  • Can you divorce your parents in England and Wales?

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Entrepreneurship, Investment and Risk: Key Insights for Family Offices

    Marcus Yorke-Long

    Quick Reads

  • Michael Wells-Greco and Hannah Owen write for Today's Family Lawyer on a recent UK Supreme Court case that considers whether an adoption order can be set aside on welfare grounds

    Michael Wells-Greco

    In the Press

  • eprivateclient quotes Richard Honey and Charlotte Hill on how the Property (Digital Assets) Act in the UK is impacting private clients

    Charlotte Hill

    In the Press

  • Sally Ashford comments in Spear's, IFA Magazine, and eprivateclient on the UK Spring Statement

    Sally Ashford

    In the Press

  • Tamasin Perkins writes for IFA Magazine on risks arising from the intersection of family wealth and commercial lending

    Tamasin Perkins

    In the Press

  • China stepping up efforts to attract foreign investment — New measures and new trends

    Shirley Fu

    Insights

  • Swiss Federal Supreme Court Rules: No Transfer of Holiday Home to Trust Without Authorisation

    Alexia Egger Castillo

    Quick Reads

  • Why the UK Remains Attractive to US Wealth Owners

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

  • Matt Foster comments in the Financial Times and the Daily Mail on the importance of cryptocurrency disclosure in divorce proceedings

    Matt Foster

    In the Press

  • SFI26: What Agricultural Practitioners Need to Know

    Maddie Dunn

    Quick Reads

  • UK TAX FOR US PEOPLE

    Sangna Chauhan

    Insights

Back to top