• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

VAT Reverse Charge for Construction: Now, never, later?

With only 10 days left of February, and the VAT reverse charge for construction due to come into force on Monday 1st March, it looks increasingly likely that the UK government is not going to postpone this significant tax change in the construction sector.

This is notwithstanding a very considerable snowballing recently of industry opposition to - at the very least - the timing of this significant change. Some may wish this change was "never", but "later" is clearly the preferred view of the sector to "now".

Build UK

has been leading the construction industry-wide campaign to raise awareness of the impact of the construction sector reverse charge, but all the major trade bodies wrote to the Chancellor back in early December 2020. An early day motion was tabled in Parliament on 8th February expressing concern at the decision of the government to go ahead with the introduction of the reverse charge for construction services at this time.

The Treasury estimate that the new reverse charge will generate additional revenue of circa £100m through better compliance and the avoidance of fraud, which is clearly an important aim. However, the risks of making this change to the industry as a whole (which has an annual GDP output of over £115bn) do need to be balanced against that aim, and in particular the impact the change may have on small and medium sized businesses (SMEs).

Whilst it is true that the introduction of the reverse charge for the construction sector has already been postponed previously, the timing now is seen as particularly challenging to the construction sector still grappling with the impact of a prolonged pandemic and Brexit. The changes mean that the construction supplier will no longer charge VAT on its specified supplies. The subcontractor receiving the supplies will be responsible for accounting for and paying any VAT due to HMRC. The change will have a particular impact on SMEs. It is estimated that the requirements for additional cash flow to meet the charge will equate to approximately 5% of annual sales for those companies that submit quarterly VAT returns and 3% for those that submit monthly returns, and many commentators have highlighted the cash flow risks to businesses otherwise just about trading their way through these challenging times.

One less commented on aspect of the challenge for SMEs in the construction sector arising from the reverse charge is that this is not the only significant tax change about to impact the industry. At the start of the new tax year on the 6th April, construction will also be impacted by material changes to both the Construction Industry Scheme and the IR35 off payroll changes. All of these changes will give rise to compliance headaches for businesses and lead to increased administrative costs in the short term, particularly for SMEs.

As a firm we are well placed to assist clients struggling with these issues. Hugh Gunson, a Legal Director in our Tax Disputes practice, has written about the IR35 changes here, and Helen Coward, a partner in our Corporate Tax team, has written about the Construction Industry Scheme rules changes here. Helen's article reviewing the application of the reverse charge in construction can be found here.

The introduction of the VAT reverse charge in March will have a huge impact on the financial stability of companies across the construction supply chain that comply with all their legal obligations.

The risk to companies, jobs and projects in both the public and private sectors is significant which is why build UK and its members are calling for the Chancellor to withdraw the legislation.

Suzannah Nichol MBE, Chief Executive Build UK

Our thinking

  • Spotlight on small businesses and high net worth individuals as HMRC mind the gap

    Cora Hardy

    Quick Reads

  • The Impact of PISCES Stamp Duty Exemption

    Robert Birchall

    Quick Reads

  • Navigating Team Moves and Business Protection in the DIFC and ADGM: A Legal Perspective

    Nick Hurley

    Quick Reads

  • Timely Filing US Federal Estate Tax Returns: Navigating Trump's Post-Liberation Day Market Crash from an Estate Tax Perspective

    Ivan Lu

    Quick Reads

  • Corporate Transparency Act: I’m still alive but I’m barely breathin’

    Timmoney Ng

    Quick Reads

  • When is 20% not 20%? The real impact of the proposed changes to business property relief on trading companies

    Sarah Wray

    Quick Reads

  • Yacine Diallo and Pierre-Philip Leroux-Moga write for Agefi Luxembourg on the migration of high-net-worth individuals

    Yacine Diallo

    In the Press

  • Updated HMRC guidance following Vermilion Holdings: when is a securities option “employment-related”?

    Tessa Newman

    Insights

  • Autumn Budget 2024: Share incentives

    Tessa Newman

    Quick Reads

  • Autumn budget - Capital Gains Tax increase and divorce settlements

    Sarah Higgins

    Quick Reads

  • Capital gains tax rises - our view

    Robert Birchall

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes new Partner specialising in Corporate Tax

    James Stewart

    News

  • The Luxembourg government proposes tax amendments providing clarity and legal certainty

    Yacine Diallo

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Vitro on a major international restructuring project

    David Córdova Flores

    News

  • Property Patter: Spring Budget 2024

    Emma Humphreys

    Podcasts

  • How the abolition of Multiple Dwellings Relief affects Build to Rent

    William Marriott

    Quick Reads

  • Guide to EMI Share Options

    Robert Birchall

    Insights

  • A guide to Company Share Option Plans

    Robert Birchall

    Insights

  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Development Partners International and Verod Capital Management on investment into Pan African Towers

    Adrian Mayer

    News

  • Property118 schemes for landlords – a mistake worth fixing?

    Hugh Gunson

    Insights

Back to top