• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Damages-based agreements: A positive step by the Court of Appeal

min read

The Court of Appeal’s recent ruling in Zuberi v Lexlaw Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 16 provides some much-needed clarity around one of the funding options available to litigants: damages-based agreements (DBAs).

DBAs, where a law firm takes a share of damages in lieu of payment of legal fees, have not to date been widely taken up by the legal community. The 2013 Regulations brought in to govern agreements of this nature were  “not the draftsman’s finest hour” in the words of the Court of Appeal. In particular, the Regulations have generated uncertainty as to whether provision for payment of a firm’s fees may be included in the event of early termination by the client.

The Court of Appeal scrutinised the Regulations and this issue in Zuberi, upholding the High Court’s ruling that early termination provisions were not caught by the Regulations (see our article here on that judgment). The court diverged on how widely or narrowly a DBA should be construed under the Regulations, leaving open a question as to what degree a “hybrid” arrangement may be permitted (whereby a DBA is combined with, for example, payment of reduced hourly rates). There is hope that proposed new Regulations will address this issue but, in the meantime, the court was at least unanimous in upholding the use of early termination provisions.

Ostensibly, this is good news for law firms, since it allows them to build in a degree of protection otherwise lacking when using a DBA. But it is also a positive development for the clients of law firms, since it should make the use of DBAs more attractive (or less risky) for solicitors, in turn offering a genuine option to consider for funding a claim. 

In the current economic climate, being able to have easy access to clear and transparent forms of alternative litigation funding is especially important. Our bespoke funding product Feesible is designed to meet this aim, and decisions such as that of the Court of Appeal in Zuberi and the prospect of future legislative reform are to be welcomed when looking to structure funding for a claim and managing risk.

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • The Increased Expedited Procedure Threshold under the 2026 ICC Rules: What Does It Mean for Mid-Value Construction Disputes in the UAE?

    Glenn Bull

    Insights

    min read
  • The Next Frontier? Follow On Claims and the Future of Loss of Chance Litigation in International Sports

    Daniel McDonagh

    Events

    min read
  • Case No. 9. Can an arbitration clause be extended to a non-signatory party, and what are the relevant factors?

    Annapaola Negri-Clementi

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys LLP, as Liquidator of Awal Bank BSC(c) (In Liquidation), welcomes Bahraini Court judgment upholding liquidator’s rejection of US$2.8 billion of claims and confirming debts owing to Awal Bank of US$2.56 billion

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    News

    min read
  • SLAPPs, Scrolls & Silencing: Media Law Under the Spotlight

    Claudine Morgan

    Events

    min read
  • Bridging East and West: Resolving China Related Disputes in a Global Era

    Jue Jun Lu

    Events

    min read
  • New Corporate Liability for criminal offences committed by Senior Managers: Section 250 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026

    Rachel Warren

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Forum Wars or Forum Steering? Global licence determinations, cross border complexities, ADR and the next stage of FRAND Disputes

    Robert Lundie Smith

    Events

    min read
  • New 2026 ICC Rules of Arbitration: what’s changed and what it means

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Steering the Ship: Navigating the Seas of Trust Applications without Capsizing into Hostile Litigation

    Robert Avis

    Events

    min read
  • The Dubai Conflicts of Jurisdiction Tribunal Continues to Define the Boundaries of DIFC and Onshore Dubai Court Jurisdiction in Arbitral Award Recognition and Enforcement

    Thomas R. Snider

    Insights

    min read
  • Disputes Over Donuts: Spotlight on the ICC Arbitration Rules 2026

    Thomas R. Snider

    Podcasts

  • Charles Russell Speechlys moves offices in Milan following consistent growth of Italian practice

    Michael Lingens

    News

    min read
  • After You Leave: Navigating Non-Competes and Non-Solicitation Under Swiss Law

    Remo Wagner

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Emoji on trial: Can a thumbs-up waive a rent increase?

    Harriet Durn

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Benoît Pasquier comments in Law UK on Switzerland as a leading centre for sports disputes

    Benoît Pasquier

    In the Press

    min read
  • Rachel Warren and Charlotte Healy write for FT Adviser on how the Serious Fraud Office's latest business plan measures up against its five-year strategy

    Rachel Warren

    In the Press

    min read
  • Access to privileged company documents: shareholder rule abolished

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Limitation and unfair prejudice petitions: the legend of Zedra

    Claudine Morgan

    Insights

    min read
Back to top