• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Damages-based agreements: A positive step by the Court of Appeal

The Court of Appeal’s recent ruling in Zuberi v Lexlaw Ltd [2021] EWCA Civ 16 provides some much-needed clarity around one of the funding options available to litigants: damages-based agreements (DBAs).

DBAs, where a law firm takes a share of damages in lieu of payment of legal fees, have not to date been widely taken up by the legal community. The 2013 Regulations brought in to govern agreements of this nature were  “not the draftsman’s finest hour” in the words of the Court of Appeal. In particular, the Regulations have generated uncertainty as to whether provision for payment of a firm’s fees may be included in the event of early termination by the client.

The Court of Appeal scrutinised the Regulations and this issue in Zuberi, upholding the High Court’s ruling that early termination provisions were not caught by the Regulations (see our article here on that judgment). The court diverged on how widely or narrowly a DBA should be construed under the Regulations, leaving open a question as to what degree a “hybrid” arrangement may be permitted (whereby a DBA is combined with, for example, payment of reduced hourly rates). There is hope that proposed new Regulations will address this issue but, in the meantime, the court was at least unanimous in upholding the use of early termination provisions.

Ostensibly, this is good news for law firms, since it allows them to build in a degree of protection otherwise lacking when using a DBA. But it is also a positive development for the clients of law firms, since it should make the use of DBAs more attractive (or less risky) for solicitors, in turn offering a genuine option to consider for funding a claim. 

In the current economic climate, being able to have easy access to clear and transparent forms of alternative litigation funding is especially important. Our bespoke funding product Feesible is designed to meet this aim, and decisions such as that of the Court of Appeal in Zuberi and the prospect of future legislative reform are to be welcomed when looking to structure funding for a claim and managing risk.

Our thinking

  • Scoring Big: The dynamics of Investment in Sport

    Molly Moseley

    Quick Reads

  • Within or out of scope: third party communications and without prejudice privilege

    Simon Heatley

    Insights

  • Through the Looking-Glass: Is the Government's Vision for Farming Coming into Focus?

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • The Murdochs and the Buffetts – succession planning for billionaires

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • LCIA's 2024 Casework Report – Still Going Strong

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Serious failings by Trustee amount to a breach of trust: Charles Russell Speechlys advises the Hon. Mrs Dawson-Damer in appeal of long-running trust dispute

    Ziva Robertson

    News

  • Maddie Dunn writes for Farmers Guardian on last month’s Spending Review and the Government’s attitude to farming

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

  • ICC Arbitration Statistics 2024 – UAE Breaks into Top 5 Seats

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Why Getty Images v Stability AI Judgment Will Not Answer Our Key Questions

    Nick White

    Insights

  • How does extradition work?

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Extradition in the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

    Ghassan El Daye

    Insights

  • Food Security is National Security: can regenerative agriculture help fortify the UK?

    Maddie Dunn

    Insights

  • To share or not to share, that is the question. The Supreme Court hands down judgment in ‘big money’ divorce case Standish v Standish and clarifies the position regarding matrimonialisation and the sharing principle

    Miranda Fisher

    Insights

  • Joseph Evans, Ethan Khurwolah and Simon Heatley write for Thomson Reuters Practical Law on litigation funding and PACCAR

    Joseph Evans

    In the Press

  • CDR Magazine quotes Simon Le Wita on the Keystone XL pipeline ICSID arbitration

    Simon Le Wita

    In the Press

  • Courts are not couples’ therapists - and that’s a good thing

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • Hague Judgments Convention 2019: Easing cross-border recognition and enforcement of judgments between all UK nations, the EU & beyond from 1 July 2025

    Molly Tatchell

    Quick Reads

  • Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes highly regarded regulatory and investigations litigator Richard Burger in London

    Richard Burger

    News

  • Tuition Tussle: Unveiling the VAT Verdict in the Private School Fees Showdown in the case of "ALR and others v Chancellor of the Exchequer Case"

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

  • Litigation funding and PACCAR: reverse, regulate and reform

    Joseph Evans

    Insights

Back to top