• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Government announces further funding for building safety

The government has today announced a new fund of £3.5 billion as part of a pledge “to fully fund the cost of replacing unsafe cladding for all leaseholders in residential buildings 18 metres (6 storeys) and over in England ”.

Although further details are awaited, the £3.5 billion fund, announced today, is the latest in a number of government funds intended to finance certain costs associated with building safety on high rise buildings.

In the private sector, the first of these was the £200 million fund announced on 9 May 2019 which focused on the replacement of unsafe ACM cladding from privately owned buildings over 18 metres high.  Please click here for our insight.  The government had already established a £400 million fund in May 2018 for the replacement of unsafe ACM cladding in the social housing sector. Next came the £1 billion Building Safety Fund announcement on 11 March 2020 for the removal and replacement of unsafe non-ACM cladding systems from high-rise residential buildings in both the private and social housing sectors.

Registration for applications for both the ACM cladding and non-ACM cladding funds have closed.  However, the government previously announced that the deadline for building owners to complete their applications for the Building Safety Fund has been extended from December 2020 to 30 June 2021.  It is not clear from today’s announcement what the application process for the new £3.5 billion fund will be.

Most recently, December 2020 saw the announcement of a £30 million Waking Watch Relief Fund for the installation of fire alarm systems in private sector high-rise buildings with unsafe cladding after 17 December 2020. The application process for this opened on 31 January 2021 in relation to private sector buildings in England (except in Greater London) and all eligible social sector buildings.  In Greater London, applications will open on a date to be fixed before 22 March 2021 with the Greater London Authority administering the fund.

In its press release today, the government has also indicated that arrangements for buildings between 11 and 18 metres will involve a scheme for replacement of cladding through long-term, low interest and government-backed loans.  Further details are awaited of this scheme.

In addition to the increase in funding announced today, the government confirmed its intention to introduce a new levy on developers when seeking permission to develop certain high-rise buildings in England as well as a new residential developer tax. My colleague Helen Coward has commented on the proposed residential developer tax here.

Our thinking

  • Updates from the Building Safety Regulator - Unblocking the Gateways for Higher Risk Buildings

    Tegan Johnson

    Quick Reads

  • What legal developments can the Living Sector expect as we approach the end of 2025 and look ahead to 2026?

    Mark White

    Insights

  • Understanding the Fire Safety (Residential Evacuation Plans) (England) Regulations 2025: The Living Sector

    David Savage

    Insights

  • Michael O'Connor and Richard Flenley write for Construction Law on lessons from two Building Safety Act (BSA) cases in the Court of Appeal

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Building and Housing Today quote Francis Ho on whether the shadow of Grenfell could trigger more Ardmore-style collapses

    Francis Ho

    In the Press

  • Higher Risk Buildings - How to make sure you get your building control application right

    Marie Randall

    Insights

  • Court of Appeal backs FTT on Fire-Safety Defects Remediation

    Michael O'Connor

    Insights

  • Court of Appeal confirms limits to retrospective effect of Building Safety Act 2022

    Oliver Park

    Insights

  • Oliver Park writes for Estates Gazette on a recent rebuke to the FTT over its management of a remediation order case

    Oliver Park

    In the Press

  • Unblocking Delays in High-Rise Home Construction: A New Era for Building Safety Regulation

    Tegan Johnson

    Quick Reads

  • Property Week quotes Michael O'Connor on the Court of Appeal rejecting Get Living's appeal against Triathlon over fire safety defects

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Levy the Playing Field – The challenges of the Building Safety Levy for the Living Sector

    Ashley Williams

    Insights

  • Beyond Gateway 2

    Mark Barley

    Insights

  • Michael O'Connor and Lauren Fraser write for Property Week on the impact of the Building Safety Act on residential property management

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Developers Granted (Temporary) Reprieve: Building Safety Levy Postponed To Autumn 2026

    Ashley Williams

    Insights

  • Building Safety and the challenges for UK construction - where are we now?

    David Savage

    Events

  • Michael O'Connor writes for Construction News on the potential impact of Building Liability Orders (BLOs) on the construction sector

    Michael O'Connor

    In the Press

  • Adjudicators can hear legacy building safety defect claims: BDW Trading Limited v Ardmore Construction Limited [2024] EWHC 3235

    Melanie Tomlin

    Insights

  • The first case on Information Orders in connection with Building Liability Orders: BDW Trading Limited v. Ardmore Construction Limited & Ors

    Insights

  • Carris Peacey and Sylwia Jatczak write for R3 RECOVERY Magazine on the Building Safety Act 2022 and the obligations on IPs

    Carris Peacey

    In the Press

Back to top