• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Building anxieties: The impact of a possible CGT rate rise on housebuilders

min read

On 3 March 2021 the Chancellor is due to deliver his next Budget. One widely feared change on the horizon is an increase in the rate of capital gains tax (CGT) – particularly following the Office of Tax Simplification (OTS) report published in November 2020. Among other suggestions, the OTS report suggested that the rates of CGT should be aligned with those of income tax which would generally mean a significant increase in the amount of tax payable; the top rate of income tax in the UK being 45% compared to the usual top rate of CGT of 20% (or 28% for gains on the disposal of residential property and carried interest).

Time of disposal?

 For any ongoing transactions, landowners are likely to be putting pressure on housebuilders to pick up the pace so that they can dispose of their asset before 3 March and bank gains prior to a rate rise. Of course, no one yet knows whether the change will come to pass and both parties should think carefully before rushing into a transaction based only on speculation about changes of law.

But when does a disposal take place for CGT purposes? Where the asset is being disposed of under a contract (as will usually be the case for land), not the date of completion as some might expect. Where an asset is sold under an unconditional contract, the date of disposal is the date on which that contract is executed.

If there is to be a condition under the contract (the most usual being the housebuilder securing detailed planning permission for its development) then care needs to be taken to determine whether this does make the contract conditional or whether it is simply a condition to completion. In some circumstances a contract might be unconditional for this purpose even if there is a condition to be satisfied before completion can take place. Specialist advice should be sought as this is a complex question.

Where an asset is sold under a conditional contract then the disposal occurs only when the condition is satisfied.

A chilling effect

 Assuming for a moment that the rates do rise as anticipated, this could have unexpected consequences for the housing market. Landowners disposing of investment property could in the future be subject to much higher amounts of CGT on their chargeable gains than currently, thereby significantly reducing their returns. This may mean that some landowners may become more reluctant to dispose of their property interests, or will demand far higher consideration for doing so, with knock-on consequences for market activity.

A further key point for housebuilders to note relates to the impact on existing option and promotion agreements with landowners, particularly those containing “freezer” clauses and those where the purchase price is calculated by reference to the market value of the land. Freezer clauses generally allow a landowner (or a promoter or developer, depending on the agreement in question) to delay the sale of the land where the purchase price for the land falls below a minimum price due to a fall in the market. The clause has the effect of “freezing” the option period in which the housebuilder company can purchase the land until the purchase price or potential development value exceeds the minimum set out in the agreement.

If prices fall (or the clause is drafted by reference to the net amount retained by the landowner), then the buyer’s option to purchase may be frozen and this could be relevant to a number of transactions. Housebuilders may find that option periods are similarly frozen in relation to more than one agreement at the same time, which could have significant ramifications for housebuilders’ pipeline and in due course new housing supply.

In short, housebuilders should be aware of the potential challenges that a rate rise may bring (both before and after the change). Any changes could have a significant impact on future property developments, and businesses should consider how they can protect themselves moving forward, while keeping up to date with any announcements made in March.

Our thinking

  • Swiss executors dealing with UK assets – what do I do? Part one

    Sophie Hart

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys Opens New York Office and Connecticut Practice

    Simon Ridpath

    News

    min read
  • Nicola Saccardo speaks to TopLegal on the growth of Charles Russell Speechlys’ Italian practice

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Yacine Diallo discusses Luxembourg holding structures on Le Family Office podcast

    Yacine Diallo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises Lauralu's management on its sale to Eurazeo

    Stéphane de Lassus

    News

    min read
  • Why families use Family Investment Companies (FICs)?

    Edward Robinson

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Nicola Saccardo speaks to Spear's on cross-border divorce and succession in Italy

    Nicola Saccardo

    In the Press

    min read
  • Lauren Fraser comments in Property Week on potential challenges in implementing the UK Government's draft Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Bill

    Lauren Fraser

    In the Press

    min read
  • Jonathan Burt comments in Bloomberg Tax about HMRC’s consultation on the Uncertain Tax Treatment regime

    Jonathan Burt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises long standing client SPS on its acquisition of Cleardata

    Hamish Perry

    News

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 4: Inheritance tax and estate planning

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The clock is ticking for COVID-era IRS penalty refunds

    Kurt Rademacher

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Alix Taquet and Sarah Bergougnoux write for Décideurs Patrimoine on the taxation of wealth transfers in France

    Alix Taquet

    In the Press

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 3: Navigating trusts, businesses and investment pitfalls

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Alice Martin, Elena Dunn and Carolyn Steppler write for Tax Journal on the UK tax implications of loans from non-UK resident trusts

    Alice Martin

    In the Press

    min read
  • Erell Bauduin and Julia Landru publish in STEP Journal on family business succession planning in France

    Erell Bauduin

    In the Press

    min read
  • US citizens moving to the UK part 2: Understanding the UK tax system

    Sangna Chauhan

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys advises RYDGE Conseil on its acquisition of Fiduciaire Cabexco and Cabexco Proactive

    Yacine Diallo

    News

    min read
  • The implications of the High Value Council Tax Surcharge

    Charis Thornton

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys bolsters Private Client practice in Asia with five‑strong team, appointing Kevin Lee as regional head

    Simon Green

    News

    min read
Back to top