• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The six-month countdown has begun!

min read

On 31 March 2021, the government’s recently introduced “SDLT holiday” which increased the thresholds on which stamp duty land tax (SDLT) is payable, from £125,000 to £500,000, will come to an end.

For purchasers waking up on 1 April 2021, not only will the standard rates of SDLT apply once again, but a new 2% surcharge (in addition to the current residential rates) will be imposed on non-UK resident buyers of residential property.

Until now, the buyer’s place of residence has not been relevant to the level of SDLT payable on a purchase. However, in a move to prevent UK property prices from being driven up by foreign investors, the government is set to introduce the new surcharge which could see purchasers pay up to 17% in SDLT.

For overseas investors interested in buying UK residential property, the next six months will be crucial.

Here we address a number of FAQs:

Who does the 2% surcharge apply to? 

The new rules will apply to non-UK residents. UK resident close companies that meet the proposed non-UK control test will also be caught.

What is the definition of a non-UK resident? 

For the purpose of determining if an individual purchaser is UK resident, a person who has spent fewer than 183 days in the UK during any continuous 365-day period in the period which begins 364 days before the effective date of the transaction (usually completion) and ends 365 days after that date, will be non-resident. 

The residence test for companies is the ordinary corporation tax test, subject to the point made above regarding close companies.

What if I become UK resident after completion? 

There will be a period of 2 years following the effective date of the purchase in which an individual buyer may amend their SDLT return and claim repayment of the 2% surcharge. To qualify, the purchaser must have satisfied the residence conditions mentioned above in the 12 months following the effective date of the transaction.

Does the 2% surcharge apply to all UK property?

All property in England and Northern Ireland will be affected by the new rules. Scotland and Wales have their own regimes (although a similar charge could be introduced in the future).

What if I am already liable to pay the 3% surcharge on “additional property”? 

Non-UK resident buyers who are already caught by the 3% surcharge (such as individuals who purchase a second home (and are not replacing their main residence) or a buy to let investment) will pay the 3% surcharge for additional property plus the 2% surcharge for overseas buyers, on top of the standard rates.

What if I am a company purchaser and already liable to pay the 15% flat rate of SDLT? 

For company purchasers which are subject to the 15% flat rate, the 2% surcharge (if applicable) will apply on top of the 15% rate, resulting in a potential tax liability of 17%. Those which qualify for relief from the flat rate (for example, property investment companies) will normally pay 2% on top of the higher rates of SDLT.

What if I exchange contracts before 1 April 2021 but complete after that date? 

SDLT is charged according to the position as at completion (or earlier substantial performance), therefore if you complete on or after 1 April 2021 and you are within the scope of the surcharge, you will be caught by the new rules, unless you exchanged contracts before 11 March 2020, in which case it may be possible to avoid the surcharge.

SDLT and the issue of tax residence are increasingly complex areas of law on which purchasers are advised to take legal advice. Our specialist property and tax lawyers would be pleased to assist.

Rebecca Day, Associate (Private Property)

Our thinking

  • IBA Annual Conference 2026

    Jean-Baptiste Beauvoir-Planson

    Events

  • Arbitration of Trust Disputes Webinar

    Thomas R. Snider

    Events

    min read
  • Hannah Catt writes in PrimeResi on the upcoming High-Value Council Tax Surcharge in the UK and why it needs careful design

    Hannah Catt

    In the Press

    min read
  • Costs in DIFC Employment Cases: Two New Decisions Confirm the Strength of Practice Direction 1/2025

    Peter Smith

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • The latest UK-Switzerland Services Deal: Is it a Game-Changer for Cross-Border Mobility?

    Paul McCarthy

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Diversification, safe havens and the pivot to Asia for US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • William Longrigg writes in the Law Society Gazette on the potential return of Calderbank offers in family proceedings

    William Longrigg

    In the Press

    min read
  • Bloomberg quotes Gaven Cheong on proposed Hong Kong tax exemptions on carried interest

    Gaven Cheong

    In the Press

    min read
  • Family Offices want crypto – but who's helping them get there?

    Shaanil Senarath-Dassanayake

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Succession, governance and the next generation in US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Why the UK-India Trade Deal Matters for Private Capital

    Kim Lalli

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Wei Kang comments on China’s new tax rule on offshore trusts in The Straits Times

    In the Press

    min read
  • A New Era of Wealth and Estate Planning for PRC High-Net-Worth Families

    Wei Kang

    Insights

    min read
  • Autumn Budget 2026: possible CGT changes and pre-budget planning

    Julia Cox

    Insights

    min read
  • Technology, AI and US Family Offices

    Hugh Dixon

    Quick Reads

    min read
  • Reaz Jafri quoted in CNBC on EU crackdown on Caribbean "golden passport" programmes

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys named a ‘Firm to Watch’ by India Business Law Journal

    News

    min read
  • Simon Ridpath discusses Charles Russell Speechlys' strategic US expansion with Legal Business

    In the Press

    min read
  • Corporate Deal Highlights - A spotlight on H1 2026

    Sarah Wigington

    Insights

    min read
  • Phillip Colasanto authors article in Tax Notes Federal on strengthening procedural protections for third parties in IRS collections

    In the Press

    min read
Back to top