• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

The "someone else" in relationship breakdown - the Tax Man

If the pandemic were not bad enough in itself, it is thought that divorce and dissolution rates will increase as strained personal and financial circumstances bring couples to tipping point.  However, let us not forget the “someone else” involved in nearly all separations – the Tax Man.  

The strange circumstances brought about by Covid-19 together with certain tax changes means separating couples should think more carefully than ever to ensure the Tax Man does not make a difficult time in their lives, even worse. Below are just a few of the common issues.  

Year of separation

Transfers of assets between couples who are married or in civil partnerships before the end of the tax year of permanent separation take place on a “no gain, no loss” basis for capital gains tax (CGT). It has long been known that this causes unfairness for couples who separate in, say, February, and so can only benefit from this for a month or two, compared to couples who separate in, say, June, who have the best part of a year.  

What is lesser known, however, is that it is possible to be “separated” for these purposes whilst still living together.  For example, in Holmes v Mitchell (1991), it was found that the couple were living as separate households despite being under the same roof.  This phenomenon may be more common today where practical and financial complications mean separating couples may be forced to remain cohabiting.

Final period exemption

Before 6 April 2014, you could sell or transfer your main home up to three years after you had moved out and (subject to certain conditions) not face a CGT bill. From that date, this “final period exemption” was reduced to 18 months and, with Finance Act 2020 now in force, this has been further reduced to nine months with effect for sales and transfers from 6 April 2020.  

Although there is a specific CGT exemption in relation to transfers of the family home between separating spouses/civil partners (subject to certain conditions), this is of no assistance where the family home has to be sold on the open market.  

Whilst the three year final period exemption remains for individuals who are disabled or in a care home, there is little sympathy for those considered “fortunate enough to have two homes”.  This puts separating couples in a difficult position as often, in the realities of a relationship breakdown, they are not able to sell their main home within nine months of (usually) one of them moving out.  To top it off, under the new rules introduced this year, the CGT bill would need to be paid within 30 days of the sale. 

Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) “holiday”

Where a separating couple owns their home jointly, the purchase of a new property by the spouse/civil partner leaving the family home attracts the 3% SDLT surcharge if they are still married/in a civil partnership at the time.  To have the prospect of this surcharge being refunded, the “leaver” of the couple would have to sell or transfer his/her interest in the family home within three years, which does little for immediate cashflow.

However, the recently announced “SDLT holiday” offers a silver lining.  Whilst it does not provide a holiday from the surcharge, it does reduce the baseline SDLT rates on which the surcharge is applied, lowering the up-front SDLT bill. Separating couples may wish to agree the purchase of the “leaver’s” new home sooner rather than later though, since the “SDLT holiday” ends on 31 March 2021. 

It is understandable that in the midst of relationship breakdown, a pandemic and economic uncertainty, tax is the last thing on anyone’s mind. However, if there is only one thing a separating couple can agree on, it will probably be to both walk away with more in their pockets. 

To achieve this, well-rounded advice is vital, and we are proud as a full-service law firm that collaboration between our family, property and tax specialists comes second nature.

Our thinking

  • The Murdochs and the Buffetts – succession planning for billionaires

    Tamasin Perkins

    Insights

  • LCIA's 2024 Casework Report – Still Going Strong

    Dalal Alhouti

    Quick Reads

  • Jurisdictions: choosing the right base for your family office

    Insights

  • Serious failings by Trustee amount to a breach of trust: Charles Russell Speechlys advises the Hon. Mrs Dawson-Damer in appeal of long-running trust dispute

    Ziva Robertson

    News

  • Maddie Dunn writes for Farmers Guardian on last month’s Spending Review and the Government’s attitude to farming

    Maddie Dunn

    In the Press

  • Thomas Moran and Ruth Morris write for Prime Resi on the Prime London market and the wider impact of rental reform

    Thomas Moran

    In the Press

  • UK tax considerations for US persons relocating to the UK

    Matthew Radcliffe

    Insights

  • Offshore trusts: Have reports of their demise been greatly exaggerated?

    Dominic Lawrance

    Insights

  • Keeping compliant: Navigating SFO regulations globally

    Christopher Gothard

    Insights

  • Q&As: The Evolution of Family Offices

    Amira Shaker-Bortman

    Insights

  • Next Gen: Upholding family values

    Elinor Boote

    Insights

  • Relocation: Important factors to consider before moving

    Insights

  • The Two Most Feared Foreign Tax Provisions in the One Big, Beautiful Bill: Now Eliminated or Defanged

    Ivan Lu

    Quick Reads

  • The decision in Standish Stands Up for Prenups – Huge boost for prenups as Supreme Court decision underscores asset protection

    Miranda Fisher

    Quick Reads

  • Courts are not couples’ therapists - and that’s a good thing

    Neeva Desai

    Quick Reads

  • City AM quotes Dominic Lawrance on the suitability of a non-dom tiered tax regime (TTR)

    Dominic Lawrance

    In the Press

  • Bill Gates' Philanthropic Urgency: a catalyst for ESG

    Tabitha Collett

    Quick Reads

  • The Law Society Gazette quotes Miranda Fisher on the upcoming Supreme Court Standish v Standish judgment

    Miranda Fisher

    In the Press

  • Liz Gifford, Janine Regan and Courtney Benard write for New Law Journal on an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill which will allow UK charities to send direct marketing emails to supporters without prior opt-in consent

    Liz Gifford

    In the Press

  • Tuition Tussle: Unveiling the VAT Verdict in the Private School Fees Showdown in the case of "ALR and others v Chancellor of the Exchequer Case"

    Jamie Cartwright

    Insights

Back to top