• Sectors we work in banner(2)

    Quick Reads

Furlough fraud and other errors in coronavirus support claims: last chance saloon

min read

In recent weeks, HMRC have made clear that they will clamp down hard on abuse of the furlough scheme and other coronavirus support measures. The passing of the Finance Act 2020 last week now gives employers a 90-day window to notify HMRC of any errors (whether deliberate or inadvertent). Businesses should therefore review their furlough claims now to mitigate the risk of an HMRC investigation in future.

Criminal investigations

The various coronavirus support measures were introduced on a "pay now, check later" basis. It has become clear that the schemes have been abused by some, and HMRC have been keen to send a clear message that fraud will not be tolerated. HMRC will open criminal investigations where they consider it appropriate and their first arrest has already been reported. There is also an online portal for people to report furlough fraud and other such abuse; it can be assumed that any such report will be important evidence in any consequent investigation.

A criminal investigation by HMRC presents serious risks for any business (including potential adverse publicity). In reality, however, it seems likely that criminal investigations will be reserved for a (perhaps significant) minority of particularly serious cases.

Civil enquiries and new HMRC powers

In addition to their criminal powers, HMRC have been given significant new powers to deal with errors in furlough claims as a civil matter. The Finance Act 2020 (which was enacted last week) contains new legislation providing that that where a business has received a furlough payment to which it was not entitled, this will be taxed at a rate of 100% (regardless of whether the original error was deliberate or accidental). This effectively allows wrongly-claimed furlough payments to be recovered as tax through the tax system, subject to HMRC's usual administration, collection and enforcement powers. HMRC will be able to use their formal information powers to compel businesses to provide information about incorrect claims. And in certain circumstances, HMRC will have the power to recover the tax from directors and other office-holders where the company is insolvent.

Importantly, the new legislation places a legal obligation on an employer to notify HMRC of any claims to which it was not entitled. There is a 90-day window for doing this (starting, broadly, from the later of 22 July and the day the furlough payment was made). There is a level of recognition by HMRC that in these extraordinary circumstances, errors may have been made. However, any failure to notify now has serious consequences, particularly where the employer knew at the time of the claim that it was not entitled to it. In such a case, the failure will be treated as "deliberate and concealed" for penalty purposes. This could give rise to a penalty of up to 100% of the amount wrongly claimed (in addition to the liability to repay the amount itself). It may also result in businesses being included on HMRC's publicly-available list of "deliberate tax defaulters".

Summary

It is of course acknowledged that businesses have a lot on their plate at present. However, this issue should not be overlooked. The 90-day window is an opportunity for employers to get on the front foot and pre-empt any future HMRC investigation. The clock is ticking however, particularly in light of the serious penalties for non-compliance. All businesses would be advised to review their furlough and other coronavirus support claims as soon as possible. If any errors are identified or suspected, appropriate advice should be taken and if necessary a disclosure should be made to HMRC. A proactive approach to this issue will be of real benefit in the long run.

If you have made an error in a claim that means you’ve received too much, you must pay this back to HMRC.

Our thinking

  • Freezing orders: how are they enforced around the world? United Arab Emirates (ADGM and DIFC) perspective

    Peter Smith

    Insights

    min read
  • Freezing Orders: how are they enforced around the world? Switzerland perspective

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

    min read
  • Freezing Orders: how are they enforced around the world? England and Wales perspective

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

    min read
  • Asset Tracing in England and Wales: Legal Tools and Public Resources

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

    min read
  • How to respond to a dawn raid: A guide to dawn raids in financial crime investigations

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • Dawn raids in Switzerland: Best practices under the revised criminal procedure code

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes two new Dispute Resolution Partners in Singapore

    Stewart Hey

    News

    min read
  • Corporate liability and penalties under The Bribery Act 2010

    Rhys Novak

    Insights

    min read
  • Swiss Anti-Corruption Laws: A Guide to Bribery Offences, Compliance, and Penalties

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

    min read
  • AML in decentralized finance and traditional finance

    Caroline Greenwell

    Insights

    min read
  • Understanding Contempt of Court in Swiss Law: Key Provisions and Penalties

    Remo Wagner

    Insights

    min read
  • Understanding Civil and Criminal Remedies in France for Financial Crimes

    Frédéric Jeannin

    Insights

    min read
  • A company can claim privilege against its own shareholder

    Emilie Brammer

    Insights

    min read
  • The United Arab Emirates – Seeking Remedies for Financial Crime

    Insights

    min read
  • Obtaining civil remedies in criminal cases: the UAE, Switzerland and France

    Frédéric Jeannin

    Insights

    min read
  • The Swiss Criminal Code on Corruption: Evolution & Developments

    Pierre Bydzovsky

    Insights

    min read
  • Peter Smith and Hannah McDonald write for Expert Witness Journal on the use of experts in international arbitration

    Peter Smith

    In the Press

    min read
  • Enforcement of Judgments

    Patrick Gearon FCIArb

    Insights

    min read
  • Karl Masi writes for The Oath on the Financial Action Task Force

    In the Press

    min read
  • Charles Russell Speechlys succeed in Greggs v Zurich Covid-19 insurance trial

    Charlotte Pender

    News

    min read
Back to top